June 18, 2004 at 12:08 am
Taken from The Scotsman on 17 June 2004:
The Kelvingrove art gallery, in Glasgow, … “in a GBP 28 million refurbishment” … there will be “a Spitfire fighter plane suspended from the ceiling” … but “it will be February 2006 before the installation of exhibits is complete and the gallery reopened”
Daz: Put it in your diary and get a photo for us! Do you know anything about this?
By: RadarArchive - 18th June 2004 at 19:15
I think NMS paid the salaries of the restoration team, but all other costs were funded by Glasgow. I may be wrong in this – I wasn’t in on all the details – but I think the money was split something like along these lines.
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 19:05
Thanks for the clarification Ian. As you say, you out to know! I did meet the team who were working on the Spitfire, and without going into details, I was very aware that there were problems in relationships and how things were being managed. I can’t comment, I wasn’t involved, but at the end of the day, it’s great that a top quality restoration was achieved. My confusion arose over the different groups involved; NMS as funder I understood to be owner, and the I was very aware that it wasn’t part of the collection as it was at E Fortune, due as you say, to the seperate team, and I knew it was destined, rightly for Glasgow to be (wrongly – gah) hung.
Mine’s two pints of Lancman Bitter and a packet of budgie scratichings, Mr steward!
Cheers 😉
By: RadarArchive - 18th June 2004 at 18:18
I’m prepared to be corrected as to the ownership, but my understanding (from talking to the restoration team leader a couple of years ago) was that it was not owned by Kelvingrove, nor East Fortune, but was a NMoS airframe. Sorry Ian, while your facts are streight, that’s not a closed case! Based at a, restored by b (who does not own it) doesn’t mean c doesn’t own it either.
Doldrums – can you ask the MoF?
Cheers
Just to help you sort things out, the National Museums of Scotland (abbreviated as NMS, never NMoS) is a group of several museums which are Scottish Executive funded. These are: the Museum of Scotland, the Royal Museum, the National War Museum of Scotland, the Museum of Scottish Country Life, the Museum of Costume and the Museum of Flight. Since the latter is the museum at East Fortune, it couldn’t be possible to be NMS but not East Fortune, since the aviation collections ARE East Fortune. The reason I know all this is because I work for NMS! Although I don’t work at the Museum of Flight, I do know how the organisation is organised.
One other interesting piece. Professionals were hired for the LA198 restoration, because big funding was provided as has already been mentioned. However, this caused discontent at East Fortune since the Aviation Preservation Society of Scotland, who do all the restoration work at the MoF, weren’t allowed to touch LA198. They still do a huge amount of work for the MoF and still don’t get the appreciation by the organisation for all they do. But I’m sure you can appreciate how they felt being told they weren’t allowed to be involved in working on a Spit! 😮
By: Mark12 - 18th June 2004 at 14:44
The real world.
Quote.
A joint venture between Glasgow City Council, National Museums of Scotland and the Scottish Executive, the restoration cost a total of £433,000.
Ah! Sombody has posted the cost of the restoration while I was looking for it.
£433k – The real world of even static restoration at commercial rates. 😉
Mark
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 13:59
You heard about the masochist who liked cold showers so he took a hot one?
By: dodrums - 18th June 2004 at 13:49
no need for suicide old chap, 10 minutes of self flagellation will do 🙂
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 13:45
Thanks! I stand corrected (a not infrequent occourance!) I will now go and commit suicide. 😉
Sorry about the spelling dodrums! Can’t spell, as any fule kno.
By: dodrums - 18th June 2004 at 13:35
JDK
it belongs to the City of Glasgow. http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/nwh_gfx_en/ART17729.html
In 1996, the aircraft was retrieved from the RAF Museum store at Cardington and with Parliamentary permission, since all military equipment is the property of the MoD, was gifted to the City of Glasgow. Two years later the restoration project began at the Museum of Flight in East Fortune.
A joint venture between Glasgow City Council, National Museums of Scotland and the Scottish Executive, the restoration cost a total of £433,000.
ps no l in the name, dodrums = half daft notions! 🙂
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 13:29
I’m prepared to be corrected as to the ownership, but my understanding (from talking to the restoration team leader a couple of years ago) was that it was not owned by Kelvingrove, nor East Fortune, but was a NMoS airframe. Sorry Ian, while your facts are streight, that’s not a closed case! Based at a, restored by b (who does not own it) doesn’t mean c doesn’t own it either.
Doldrums – can you ask the MoF?
Cheers
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 13:26
One of the shouting ‘I want to see the Spitfire’ while running around arms outspread.
That’s the way to do it!
By: Dave Homewood - 18th June 2004 at 12:11
Mmmm, that Spit looks lovely.
Why did the RAF go to three letters for the Squadron codes, like this one RAI and 501 Sqn was RAB (see TE456 here http://www.kiwiaircraftimages.com/pages/98spit1.html )
Did they run out of two-letter combinations? I doubt this could have occurred. Did perhaps the three letter codes signify something different from an average squadron? Auxiliary sqns perhaps?
By: RadarArchive - 18th June 2004 at 11:34
This is the info I have…
1997 – Gifted to the City of Glasgow by the then Minister of Defence Michael Portillo
04/03/1998 – Delivered to the Museum of Flight, East Fortune, Lothian for static restoration, funded by the Scottish Office
I can confirm that LA198 definitely does NOT belong to the National Museums of Scotland. The aircraft was restored at the Museum of Flight but does not belong to the collections at East Fortune.
Kelvingrove is run by Glasgow City and its funded by them, not by the Scottish Executive who fund NMS.
By: dodrums - 18th June 2004 at 11:30
heavy showers.
While waiting to get in, the museum doesn’t open until 11:00 on Fri and Sat (11:05 this morning) a bunch of 3 & 4 yr old nursery kids turned up. One of the shouting ‘I want to see the Spitfire’ while running around arms outspread. 🙂
By: dodrums - 18th June 2004 at 11:25
and this is how she looked 15 minutes ago
By: jbs - 18th June 2004 at 11:10
This is the info I have…
1997 – Gifted to the City of Glasgow by the then Minister of Defence Michael Portillo
04/03/1998 – Delivered to the Museum of Flight, East Fortune, Lothian for static restoration, funded by the Scottish Office
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 11:05
I don’t have my refs to hand, but I believe that the Spit is NMoS, loaned to Glasgow. Someone else may know better.
By: dodrums - 18th June 2004 at 10:36
Not sure of it’s really NMoS, Glasgow’s Museum and Art Gallery doesn’t fall under the National Museums. It was however, donated to the people of Scotland to commemorate those who flew with both 602 (City of Glasgow) and 603 (City of Edinburgh) Auxiliary Air Force squadrons. LA198 served with 602 at Abbotsinch, and we rightly call it “Glasgow’s Spitfire”.
Apparently 2 other Spitfires that served with 602 survive, R6915 and TB382.
(Still shouldn’t string her up like an airfix kit)
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 10:21
Yes, but as it’s a NMoS airframe, it was not going to be rebuilt to fly even if fuel was the only need. Sorry.
There would have been a need for a) an engine (the engine was only partly there – enough to hold exhaust stubs and prop to engine bearers b) a very sound airframe to be ripped apart and put back together if it was to be signed off as a flyer!
By: DazDaMan - 18th June 2004 at 10:08
Bugger, you lot beat me to it! :p
Pity all that hard work is going on the ceiling, though. I can’t recall who, but someone told me (possibly from here?) that if there had been a little more money, she could have been made to fly by one of those nice concerns at Duxford! 🙁
By: JDK - 18th June 2004 at 09:29
Lovely. Quick; string it up!