August 2, 2007 at 4:27 pm
I came across a website that states it’s trying to buy a Mil 12 helicopter – check out: http://www.russiantruck.co.uk/air.html. My understanding is that this is the world’s largest helicopter. Just emailed The Helicopter Museum with details.
By: Flanker_man - 11th October 2007 at 20:32
This is a pic of the monster at Le Bourget 71, I wonder if it servived.
Two V-12’s were built – the first prototype is the one in your photo taken at Le Bourget.
It is the one now at Panki – and probably the one up for sale.
The second prototype is the one at Monino.
In summary, two built – two survive.
Ken
By: Bruggen 130 - 11th October 2007 at 19:43
As an air traffic controller at Schiphol Airport Amsterdam, I handled the second prototype of the Mi-12 (CCCP-21142) in May 1971 on arrival for a fuelstop on its way to Le Bourget. It was a truely awesome sight!
It had also made a fuelstop at Groningen Airport Eelde that day; see this link http://www.crosswinds.net/~wolbrink for a picture and select Eelde 1970-1975 photo history.
This is a pic of the monster at Le Bourget 71, I wonder if it survived.

By: WJ244 - 11th October 2007 at 14:16
The Ilyushin Il -18 shown on the website was listed on Ebay a while ago !
By: Jur - 11th October 2007 at 11:38
As an air traffic controller at Schiphol Airport Amsterdam, I handled the second prototype of the Mi-12 (CCCP-21142) in May 1971 on arrival for a fuelstop on its way to Le Bourget. It was a truely awesome sight!
It had also made a fuelstop at Groningen Airport Eelde that day; see this link http://www.crosswinds.net/~wolbrink for a picture and select Eelde 1970-1975 photo history.
By: Flanker_man - 10th October 2007 at 23:05
I think you are getting your Mi’s mixed up, sold is a Mi-24 not a Mi-12!:)
Yes – but ‘For Sale’ is a Mil Mi-12 – which is the subject of this thread.
See :- http://www.russiantruck.co.uk/air.html
Actually, to strictly correct, it isn’t a Mi-12 – but a Mil V-12.
But that is what the web site says is being negotiated…. 😮
Ken
By: Newforest - 10th October 2007 at 20:22
It MUST be the one at the Mil plant at Panki…..:eek:
I can’t see the museum at Monino selling theirs ??:confused:
Ken
I think you are getting your Mi’s mixed up, sold is a Mi-24 not a Mi-12!:)
By: Flanker_man - 10th October 2007 at 20:08
According to LOOP, the Mi-24 advertised on this site has been sold to a collector in Arizona. It is supposed to be restored to ‘running’ condition. Presumably this would not be the same as ‘flying’ condition?:confused:
It MUST be the one at the Mil plant at Panki…..:eek:
I can’t see the museum at Monino selling theirs ??:confused:
Ken
By: Newforest - 10th October 2007 at 16:45
According to LOOP, the Mi-24 advertised on this site has been sold to a collector in Arizona. It is supposed to be restored to ‘running’ condition. Presumably this would not be the same as ‘flying’ condition?:confused:
By: Flanker_man - 1st September 2007 at 12:32
Just watched that video clip – and the pilot cheerfully waves at his audience from the lower glazed cockpit (blue sliding window gives it away when you review the footage) – mystery why they fitted that upper glazing then. Does the Engineer really need that good a view?
Still a fantastic piece of engineering – I love it, and it just goes to show that not all Russian kit was a copy of our Western stuff……..:)
The upper ‘penthouse’ on the V-12 was the navigator’s station.
The pilot & co-pilot sat in the lower Mi-8 style glazing.
Ken
By: hunterxf382 - 1st September 2007 at 09:14
Just watched that video clip – and the pilot cheerfully waves at his audience from the lower glazed cockpit (blue sliding window gives it away when you review the footage) – mystery why they fitted that upper glazing then. Does the Engineer really need that good a view?
Still a fantastic piece of engineering – I love it, and it just goes to show that not all Russian kit was a copy of our Western stuff……..:)
By: OHOPE - 1st September 2007 at 03:09
One for the pilot , one for the navigator and engineer I think .
By: stangman - 31st August 2007 at 20:24
What was the purpose of the two cockpits? I assume the small one on top is the cockpit but what of the nose glazing it looks like a cockpit, i can’t see the russians putting in sightseeing windows.
By: bexWH773 - 31st August 2007 at 17:54
And if you want to see it flying………WOW
http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/birotor+/video/x21rf7_helicoptere-mil-mi12-russe_tech
Impressive beastie isnt it 😀 Bex
By: Newforest - 31st August 2007 at 16:57
And if you want to see it flying………WOW
http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/birotor+/video/x21rf7_helicoptere-mil-mi12-russe_tech
By: hunterxf382 - 5th August 2007 at 22:28
I see he used half his caravan as a cockpit!:D
Actually I was thinking it looks like a split screen VW camper van in my eyes….lol 😀 😀
Still – nice to know this beast is still around, as I remember being fascinated by it as a kid – had a poster of it somewhere too 😮
By: Flanker_man - 5th August 2007 at 17:00
Amazing piece of machinery. However I wonder why the designer(s) went for all that heavy structure to mount the rotors out on the wing tips rather than fore and aft of the fuselage a la Chinook?
Roger Smith.
They did – one of the early project configurations for the V-12 was for a tandem rotor layout – but it was abandoned in favour of a side-by-side layout.
It’s all explained in Yefim Gordon’s ‘Mils Heavy Lift Helicopters’ – Vol 22 in the ‘Red Star’ series.
The tandem-rotor layout gave problems of rotor overlap, the fuselage had to be longer, the aft air intakes were in the wake of the front ones, less rate of climb, less ceiling etc etc – it’s all in the book.
Don’t forget, this machine was designed to lift 25 tonnes and have a cargo hold with the same dimensions as the Antonov An-22 😮
As built, the V-12 had the engines and rotors of TWO Mi-6’s – itself the biggest helicopter in the world at the time.
Ken
By: Newforest - 5th August 2007 at 15:24
Amazing piece of machinery. However I wonder why the designer(s) went for all that heavy structure to mount the rotors out on the wing tips rather than fore and aft of the fuselage a la Chinook?
Roger Smith.
Because he’s Russian and they like to over engineer? Because he was a bridge builder in a previous life? I see he used half his caravan as a cockpit!:D
By: RPSmith - 5th August 2007 at 14:16
Amazing piece of machinery. However I wonder why the designer(s) went for all that heavy structure to mount the rotors out on the wing tips rather than fore and aft of the fuselage a la Chinook?
Roger Smith.
By: Tillerman - 4th August 2007 at 22:12
…and the second one was stored but was reportedly in a bad condition?
In an earlier post I placed a KMZ file (Google Earth) which shows the other remaninig Mi-12 stored at the factory:
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=1025253#post1025253
Tillerman.