By: airband1 - 17th April 2005 at 23:56
The EZY photo is wicked it almost looks like the 737-36Q is going to just lay itself on the Cessna
By: airband1 - 17th April 2005 at 23:56
The EZY photo is wicked it almost looks like the 737-36Q is going to just lay itself on the Cessna
By: Lamps - 17th April 2005 at 21:58
Great Shots guys!!
By: Lamps - 17th April 2005 at 21:58
Great Shots guys!!
By: LBARULES - 17th April 2005 at 21:55
It was a 772 🙂
Still a beast 😉
By: LBARULES - 17th April 2005 at 21:55
It was a 772 🙂
Still a beast 😉
By: Ren Frew - 17th April 2005 at 20:30
Sorry couldn’t make it guys.
Perhaps a small meet tomorrow, or Tuesday?
I might pop down for more photos of the 777 tomorrow before work.
By: Ren Frew - 17th April 2005 at 20:30
Sorry couldn’t make it guys.
Perhaps a small meet tomorrow, or Tuesday?
I might pop down for more photos of the 777 tomorrow before work.
By: kevinwm - 17th April 2005 at 20:19
Hi All
Was grate to finally put a faces to a names and meet DME and Ren frew,so heres what i got
Kevin
By: kevinwm - 17th April 2005 at 20:19
Hi All
Was grate to finally put a faces to a names and meet DME and Ren frew,so heres what i got
Kevin
By: Ren Frew - 17th April 2005 at 19:44
The 773 was scheduled up until last week. I was told on Monday that it had changed. Today’s 772 was in a high density config and tomorrow’s is in a low density config. I have quite a few good shots of the landing, hopefully on A.net soon but as you say the weather for the take-off was typical 😉
Maybe some sunshine will lend a hand tomorrow? Doubt it somehow… :confused:
By: Ren Frew - 17th April 2005 at 19:44
The 773 was scheduled up until last week. I was told on Monday that it had changed. Today’s 772 was in a high density config and tomorrow’s is in a low density config. I have quite a few good shots of the landing, hopefully on A.net soon but as you say the weather for the take-off was typical 😉
Maybe some sunshine will lend a hand tomorrow? Doubt it somehow… :confused:
By: GAZGLA - 17th April 2005 at 19:40
Indeed it was, although it was allegedly going to be a 773 ? 😉
The 773 was scheduled up until last week. I was told on Monday that it had changed. Today’s 772 was in a high density config and tomorrow’s is in a low density config. I have quite a few good shots of the landing, hopefully on A.net soon but as you say the weather for the take-off was typical 😉
By: GAZGLA - 17th April 2005 at 19:40
Indeed it was, although it was allegedly going to be a 773 ? 😉
The 773 was scheduled up until last week. I was told on Monday that it had changed. Today’s 772 was in a high density config and tomorrow’s is in a low density config. I have quite a few good shots of the landing, hopefully on A.net soon but as you say the weather for the take-off was typical 😉
By: Ren Frew - 17th April 2005 at 19:37
It was a 772 🙂
Indeed it was, although it was allegedly going to be a 773 ? 😉
By: Ren Frew - 17th April 2005 at 19:37
It was a 772 🙂
Indeed it was, although it was allegedly going to be a 773 ? 😉
By: GAZGLA - 17th April 2005 at 19:36
Great shots both of you, especially yours Allen, the 773 is such a beast!
P.S – Love your new sig – The company isnt from Slovakia is it ? 😉
It was a 772 🙂
By: GAZGLA - 17th April 2005 at 19:36
Great shots both of you, especially yours Allen, the 773 is such a beast!
P.S – Love your new sig – The company isnt from Slovakia is it ? 😉
It was a 772 🙂
By: Grey Area - 17th April 2005 at 19:30
Huh!!!
I didn’t see anything wrong with it…… :diablo:
By: Grey Area - 17th April 2005 at 19:30
Huh!!!
I didn’t see anything wrong with it…… :diablo:
Sign In
April 17, 2005 at 5:14 pm