dark light

  • Doug97

Ground-to-air missiles 'may protect' London 2012 games

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15724639

Anyone know what they might be? Rapier?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,473

Send private message

By: quadbike - 19th November 2011 at 21:33

Nothings going to happen 😛

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,258

Send private message

By: mrmalaya - 19th November 2011 at 19:49

well if anyone watched the last episode of Spooks, you might be forgiven for thinking that the Typhoon needs to be in visual contact with an aircraft before it achieves “missile lock”.

Under those operating procedures, things could get messy very very quickly:rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

199

Send private message

By: observe - 18th November 2011 at 18:24

And in any case, bringing down a large aircraft over London would be insanity – surely this isn’t being seriously considered?

It’s an interesting question. The new Wembley stadium can hold 90k people, right?. If a Cessna is on a collision path to the stadium, would you choose to bring it down over one of the surrounding residential areas, if you could?
(Assuming the offending aircraft can’t be brought down/isn’t detected until it reaches Greater London.)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,556

Send private message

By: AlanR - 18th November 2011 at 17:28

Perhaps they’ll have an Apache or two, parked at Stapleford ?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,693

Send private message

By: jbritchford - 18th November 2011 at 15:59

Wouldn’t the large numbers of tall buildings in London severely limit the effectiveness of any warship moored in the thames?

And in any case, bringing down a large aircraft over London would be insanity – surely this isn’t being seriously considered?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,473

Send private message

By: quadbike - 18th November 2011 at 15:41

‘Ground to Air’ sounds odd.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

267

Send private message

By: Prom - 18th November 2011 at 14:42

I understood from the coverage on the Today programme that it was done to demonstrate the level of planning in place for the games after the US voiced its disquiet….?

I didn’t hear that.

Q How will you defend against aircraft at the Olympics
A Stick a warship in the Thames
Q Gosh, what advanced and sophisticated planning

Doesn’t quite cut it for me but its believable for politicians

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,258

Send private message

By: mrmalaya - 18th November 2011 at 14:12

I understood from the coverage on the Today programme that it was done to demonstrate the level of planning in place for the games after the US voiced its disquiet….?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

267

Send private message

By: Prom - 18th November 2011 at 13:24

It was certainly the intention a while back that a T45 would be moored in the Thames. Fox announced it IIRC. So it is odd now for Fox to ask his successor about it. No-one seems quite clear why he did

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

54

Send private message

By: MancFrank - 14th November 2011 at 23:20

Type 45 moored either on the Thames itself or in the estuary I’d think.

Regards,
Frank

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,823

Send private message

By: djcross - 14th November 2011 at 21:10

Starstreak?

Anything that would help prevent a repeat of Munich 1972.

Sign in to post a reply