dark light

How annoying was the Red Bull commentator at Kemble today?

Marks out of 10 for annoyance factor? I’ll give him 11!!!

Good on Red Bull for sponsoring the Sea Vixen though!!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 22nd June 2004 at 21:50

Sorry Crazy Mainer, you misunderstand me.

My point is only that having worked with the great Ed of Warbirds Worldwide (Any warbird you like, as long it’s a NAA product) I acquired an aversion to P51Ds. P-51A, B, C and Apatchies are OK, P51K and P82, CAC Mustangs, lovely!

However, what most people forget is that in real terms, the hard work was done by other types; the ‘D’ model is over preserved and over represented in proportion to its effect in W.W.II. The P-47 and P-38 as well as P-51 B and C were much more important and achieved more; let alone types such as the P-40, P-39, P-400 etc and even the Buffalo in the right hands.

I’m not saying that they shouldn’t preserve ‘D’s – not at all – helps the Merlin scene; but it’s simply overrated as an influential model of a type in W.W.II. (Add up ALL the other W.W.II US fighters flying and it doesn’t total 1/2 the flying ‘D’s – that’s unballanced – not wrong, just misleading.)

Post ’45? Different story. Give me a Sea Fury any day. Bearcat’s quite nice too. But best of all is the Buchon. Why? Because. Okay?

PS I’m not a Pom; so I won’t defend the Spitfire (does’nt need it either!) so the CAC Boomerang (Boomer to it’s friends) is my indiginous fighter of choice with the most unique record of any Operational W.W.II front line fighter – NO air to air kills AT ALL. Cool, eh?

Cheers

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,023

Send private message

By: Yak 11 Fan - 22nd June 2004 at 13:47

Cheers Olly,

Those pics look great. I’ll have to try to catch up with White 36 this year at some point.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 22nd June 2004 at 13:32

I do like the name Glory Hound though. When my numbers come up and I’m able to have a Spit V, it will carry Glory Hound as nose art.

It’s my aeroplane, I can paint it however I want. 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

28

Send private message

By: OLLY - 22nd June 2004 at 13:30

As the thread seems to be covering several topics, a couple of ‘White 36’ departing Wolverhampton recently.
http://img78.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Perspective-i/Yak11p6003.jpg
http://img78.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Perspective-i/Yak11p600.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 22nd June 2004 at 13:14

‘In Service’

Mark 12

You guys start this by beating on the pore little Mustang but as I shown it out lasted the Spit in service. :rolleyes:

Besides the Stang I play with has a Packer in it.

So their :p

Crazymainer,

Depends what you mean by ‘in service’ – operational, training, 2nd line support unit, ceremonial etc. Several Air Forces, including the RAF, still today have airworthy Spitfires ‘on charge’ operating under full military administration and not civil registered.

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,023

Send private message

By: crazymainer - 22nd June 2004 at 12:58

Mark 12

You guys start this by beating on the pore little Mustang but as I shown it out lasted the Spit in service. :rolleyes:

Besides the Stang I play with has a Packer in it.

So their :p

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 22nd June 2004 at 12:13

No, this room is ‘hitting on the head’ lessons, now say after me AAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHH!

Melv

Melv

I knew an ‘head hitter’ once – he used to run a magazine. 😉

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,233

Send private message

By: Andy in Beds - 22nd June 2004 at 12:08

No it wasn’t!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,074

Send private message

By: Arm Waver - 22nd June 2004 at 11:51

Oh yes it was!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,639

Send private message

By: Melvyn Hiscock - 22nd June 2004 at 11:02

but to be an arguement I must take a contrary position….

DING!

That was never five minutes!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,074

Send private message

By: Arm Waver - 22nd June 2004 at 10:25

but to be an arguement I must take a contrary position….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,233

Send private message

By: Andy in Beds - 22nd June 2004 at 10:03

This is just contradiction.
No it isn’t!
Yes it is!!
No it isn’t

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,639

Send private message

By: Melvyn Hiscock - 22nd June 2004 at 09:47

Melv,

Do you want the five minute argument or the full half hour?

Mark

No, this room is ‘hitting on the head’ lessons, now say after me AAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHH!

Melv

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 22nd June 2004 at 09:40

Melv,

Do you want the five minute argument or the full half hour?

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,639

Send private message

By: Melvyn Hiscock - 22nd June 2004 at 09:33

..but only with a British engine I note! 🙂

Mark

Well, the Glory Hound was specified (by us) as a short range interceptor. The horse was specified (by us as I remember) to have longer range!

They both did what they were designed to do. They were products of slightly different generations. Please let’s not get into this one again!

MH

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 22nd June 2004 at 09:21

…and that Stangs had the Legs to go to Big B and back while the Glory Hounds could only make it to the border. 😀

..but only with a British engine I note! 🙂

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,023

Send private message

By: crazymainer - 22nd June 2004 at 04:07

Hey JDK,

Heres one for you when was the Last P=51 retired? Next one when was the last glory hound Spit retired.

Answer

Mustang 1989 Domicain Republic 😮

Glory Hound Spit IAF 1968 :p

But we all know that it was the Hurri that did all the work in the BoB and that Stangs had the Legs to go to Big B and back while the Glory Hounds could only make it to the border. 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,454

Send private message

By: Chipmunk Carol - 21st June 2004 at 13:29

Have more video of JJ & Peter.

Noted. I’ll let him know.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,023

Send private message

By: Yak 11 Fan - 21st June 2004 at 13:02

Oh well, each to their own 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 21st June 2004 at 12:59

Hey, Yak!
What’s your obsession with Sea World? Answer’s probably because they find P-51D Mustangs common.

I was referring to RJ Mitchell’s finest, the only a/c he designed which served throughout W.W.II in the same mark. Oh, and was more significant in the history of W.W.II that the P-51D and Yak 11 I’m afraid, old bean. (The Walrus changed history. The P-51D turned up late)

However, if you wish to hold fantasies about dodgy smelly quadrapeds from the US and Russia, rather than the a/c named after them, I think you are on the wrong forum. 😉

Cheers

1 2 3 4
Sign in to post a reply