August 12, 2013 at 10:50 am
Not sure how this sits with the rules on posting – Mods, I’ll understand if you remove this..
The Whirlwind Fighter Project, now satisfied that we have access to sufficient information to build our accurate replica / reproduction (latest CAD below), are firmly into the fund-raising leg of the project.
One method, apart from a simple paypal contribution via the site (as per my signature), would be to pledge your contribution. You agree to donate £100 to the project IF and only if the pledge total reaches £20,000. This is the estimated material/manufacturing cost of a complete primary structure (but not the total cost of the project, £35 – 40,000). So promise now, and only pay if the sum needed to actually build an aeroplane is raised in pledges.
In return you get your name, or name of your choice, on a plaque attached to the aircraft in a place visible to inspection but not affecting the exterior appearance. You can pledge less, of course – but without the name on the airframe.
Flyer with contact details also via the site – or PM me.
Thanks,
Matt Bearman
By: Beermat - 18th August 2013 at 13:22
Dave Gibbins, Archivist at AgustaWestland, is your man. He’s ‘Judwin’ on here – but he’s also easy enough to find elswhwere – if you call AW on the Yeovil number in the phone book they’ll put you right through – sorry, I don’t have it in front of me here.
By: sopwith.7f1 - 17th August 2013 at 16:10
Thanks Beermat
Do you know who I can contact to find out more info on the drawings ?.
Bob T.
By: Beermat - 17th August 2013 at 12:36
Tell them it’s a rare twin engined Spitfire, that might get them interested :rolleyes:
Bob T.
Easy mistake to make, after all..
[ATTACH=CONFIG]219894[/ATTACH]
By the way, as a late answer to your question, Bob – Both wood and metal types in the Wapiti drawings at Westland..
By: sopwith.7f1 - 15th August 2013 at 16:34
They did indeed, they also built Hectors “far more interesting than Spitfires lol”.
Bob T.
By: merlinai159 - 15th August 2013 at 16:16
Well Westlands built the odd Spit did they not>>>
By: sopwith.7f1 - 15th August 2013 at 15:51
Tell them it’s a rare twin engined Spitfire, that might get them interested :rolleyes:
Bob T.
By: merlinai159 - 15th August 2013 at 14:54
Very true, come one Flypast you know where we are.
By: CeBro - 15th August 2013 at 09:02
How about the other way round? Why hasn’t FlyPast contacted them yet seing the great progress the project
is making.
Cees
By: merlinai159 - 15th August 2013 at 08:17
Just a thought has anyone on the team contacted Flypast Magazine regards an article?
By: merlinai159 - 14th August 2013 at 14:29
Hi Chris
I’ve had the conversation.. and identified some key players in making something happen. Tell you the details when we next catch up via Skype messenger..
Looking forward to it Matt
By: Beermat - 14th August 2013 at 13:47
Hi Chris
I’ve had the conversation.. and identified some key players in making something happen. Tell you the details when we next catch up via Skype messenger..
By: merlinai159 - 14th August 2013 at 12:15
A good few ideas there matt
if so, there is a fair chance that a sizeable sum could be acquired by the museum for your project from external funding bodies especially if said museum has younger volunteers who could make parts whilst learning their skills from older tradesmen, or the museum has a Whirlwind link or some such.
Yeovil perhaps?
By: Beermat - 13th August 2013 at 09:05
Thanks Rich – I will be picking the bones out of those later – very useful!
Also, thank you for all that food for thought, Johnny. That has already sparked off as couple of ideas for collaborators.. more to follow.
..and yes please on Whirlwind parts from Dumfries! It sounds like you might know exactly where the scrapping happened?
By: Johnny Kavanagh - 12th August 2013 at 20:13
Beermat, I suspect you are quite right in your funding plan and that personal donation is the easiest way to start out. However, it may be that it should only form part of your funding ‘cocktail’…
I assume you have thought of the fate of the end product? If you have earmarked a museum which will house and display the finished aircraft, you need to sit and talk to them before any metal is cut. The reasoning behind this is that virtually every museum is already a charity, will by definition have a heritage aspect to their operation, and most will have an educational aspect. If so, there is a fair chance that a sizeable sum could be acquired by the museum for your project from external funding bodies especially if said museum has younger volunteers who could make parts whilst learning their skills from older tradesmen, or the museum has a Whirlwind link or some such.
The point is that externnal funding IS out there – it may be hiding, but it does exist. A bit of collaborative thinking and forward planning might see things better funded than you think. Downside is that no funder I have come across will fund retrospectively – ie if the construction phase has started, you can’t apply. If you can continue to busy yourselves with cad work and research for another few months and attach a start and finish date (these could be far apart) to the project, you will have a nice, neat, educational project to sell. Also worth remembering that to work with young people brings it’s own workload – disclosure etc.
That lot said, good luck, and if we find any Whirlwind parts here at Dumfries (where most were scrapped) they’re yours!
By: richw_82 - 12th August 2013 at 18:20
I’m a frayed knot, Jon
We are looking at this. The definitions of the aims of a group that the Charities Commission require are the tricky bit. We need to use the ‘Heritage’ and ‘Educational’ aspects (listed as qualifiers for charitable status), but I for one don’t know how to phrase it. Does anyone have a copy of the wording of a successful bid to the commission for a similar project?
I don’t know if it helps, but this is the charities commission entry for the Shackleton Preservation Trust.
…and here’s the one for the Vulcan to the Sky Trust.
I imagine the wording of the aims and framework of either could be adapted, and are equally applicable to the Whirlwind.
Regards
Rich
By: Beermat - 12th August 2013 at 12:12
Yes, there are websites – I have had a look around, they appear geared to other things – for example Kickstarter is for ‘Creatives’ – film-makers, authors, sculptors. There is a long pre-qualification process to go through to get your project on these sites. Also, they collect a 5% fee. And, if we do get charitable status, then we can’t use Kickstarter – they specifically rule this out, as do other sites.
So I thought about it, and it’s really much simpler to ask for an email promise on the same principle (in fact it wasn’t my idea – thanks Jim).
Having said that, if there is an appropriate ‘building/restoring heritage items’ pledge site that was free or close to it then I’d look at it.
By: scrooge - 12th August 2013 at 11:55
Is there not already a website available for this type of funding in the UK? Kickstarter being the biggest I know of in the US and PledgeMe a New Zealand version- http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/capital-life/7593086/Kiwi-crowd-funding-takes-off
And some very quick research returns many options on google and answers my own question.
By: Beermat - 12th August 2013 at 11:53
I’m a frayed knot, Jon
We are looking at this. The definitions of the aims of a group that the Charities Commission require are the tricky bit. We need to use the ‘Heritage’ and ‘Educational’ aspects (listed as qualifiers for charitable status), but I for one don’t know how to phrase it. Does anyone have a copy of the wording of a successful bid to the commission for a similar project?
By: Jon H - 12th August 2013 at 11:39
Does this now signal that the group has gained charitable status?
Jon