dark light

  • SADSACK

Hurricane and Tempest questions

Is the prop on an early hurricane a DH or a Rotol?

do sea hurricanes have Dh Props and spinners?

Is the Yugoslav Hurricane IV an ex Flying can opener?

How does a Hurricane IV differ from a IID?

Are we any closer to seeing a Tempest fly?

Is there any progress on Kermit Weeks Tempest V?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,995

Send private message

By: SADSACK - 4th February 2011 at 09:54

re;

does anyone have any good resoration pictures of the RAFM example? Especially an interior shot?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

649

Send private message

By: antoni - 3rd February 2011 at 18:35

Apart from the Watts prop.

Hurricane Mk I early production Rotol 3 blade prop with short blunt spinner as found on Spitfire Mk II and early CBAF built Spitfire Mk V, or d.H three blade prop with short pointed spinner.

Hurricane Mk I late production – 3 blade prop with long chord spinner specifically designed for the Hurricane – long and pointed, same as fitted to later Mks of the Hurricane.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,995

Send private message

By: SADSACK - 3rd February 2011 at 09:58

re;

with regards to the MKIV, could it be fitted with a combination of weapons or one at a time, ie a 40MM gun under one wing and a bomb under the other, or just 40mm cannons or 20mm cannons at a time?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,800

Send private message

By: Oxcart - 1st February 2011 at 11:45

wondering which Hurricane will be next to fly, and if anyone has pictures?

G-ROBT looks quite close to flying if you look at Hawker Restorations website (to my untrained eye, anyway!)

And there is an article about Personal Plane Services (Where Mr Weeks’ Tempest V is) in the current issue of ‘Aircraft’. Tony Biachi, who runs it, says they’ve had to rebuild most of the front fuselage and modify/rebuild the wings from mark II to mark V standard.
They have not thought about where the Sabre will be rebuilt yet, but it will most likely be sent to one of the American ‘shops, and they are hoping to find some specific tools to enable them to do it. Hope this helps

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,995

Send private message

By: SADSACK - 31st January 2011 at 11:58

re;

wondering which Hurricane will be next to fly, and if anyone has pictures?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,995

Send private message

By: SADSACK - 9th January 2011 at 18:28

re;

thanks thats fantastic. Now I can get on with building a squadron of them!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

347

Send private message

By: Tony C - 9th January 2011 at 13:00

Regarding 5 & 6 see…

http://blog.kermitweeks.com/?cat=33

Hope this helps.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,108

Send private message

By: Tin Triangle - 9th January 2011 at 12:55

1. The earliest Hurricane Is had the 2-blade Watts wooden prop. They were then generally re-equipped with the DH 2-pitch three-blade metal one, then the Rotol variable-pitch one from 1940. During the Battle of Britain, if I remember, there was a long period where both types could be seen on serving Hurricanes, as the Rotol units were in rather short supply. As far as I know all Hurricanes from Mk II onward had the Rotol prop.

2.I believe that they carried both depending on the individual aircraft; I have certainly seen pictures of early Sea Hurricane Is with the DH units, even as late as 1942. However I believe as with the land Hurris, the Sea Hurricanes from the Mk II onwards had the Rotol prop.

3. Can’t help you on that one I’m afraid! If it’s anything like their Spit Vc I imagine it’s history and identity are a little murky.

4. The Hurricane IV had a “Universal” wing as with the Spitfire VC, which could theoretically be fitted with any of the types of armament available to the Mk.II. That is, bombs, 4x 20mm cannons, 12 machine guns, or 2x 40mm cannons (like the IID). I believe that it was also the only version stressed to carry rocket projectiles. I suppose, then, that all the difference is in the wing structure and alyout.

5/6. In short, I doubt it, but that’s just what I can tell from the following thread that seems to be the most recent one on the subject of Weeks’s
EJ693:
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=105307&highlight=Tempest+Weeks
From what I have heard the Sabre engine provides an almost insurmountable problem to restore to running condition due to acute lack of parts and its enormous complexity.

There is also this, which is relatively up-to date with its reports.
http://www.hawkertempest.se/EJ693.htm

As for the other Tempests: this one (Mk. II MW810) appears to be making progress Stateside:
http://www.ezellaviation.com/tempest.html

Noit so sure about this one (Mk.II MW763):
http://www.hawkertempest.se/MW763.htm

Sign in to post a reply