dark light

Hurricane with skis

Finns tried everything, I mean everything! HC-454 late 1940 or early 1941.

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/149/59965519ea9.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

309

Send private message

By: bms44 - 29th June 2008 at 07:25

Having looked more closely at the Finnish Hurricane, it is apparent that the wheels are no longer fitted, just skis : the leg length appears correct without said wheels. So the question would now be what would be the speed performance if flown as is with u/c legs down all the time? It must be significant when such things as non-flush rivetting can have such a detrimental effect on high performance (of their time) fighter aircraft?
Kinda answers part of my former post question, I suppose… should have gone to Sp@csavers!

Brian

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

309

Send private message

By: bms44 - 29th June 2008 at 07:16

The Canadian modification is obviously a permanent arrangement – see the undercarriage legs, but does the Finnish mod have skis fitted on the wheels? They’re obviously unretractable as they are, and the handling performance and speed must have been drastically reduced if left down, besides if they were only temporary and abandoned on take-off, leaving the wheels as normal, how would it then land if unable to find an area without snow? I imagine we’re talking really hard winter situation in Finland, and they would have been called upon to fight, unlike the Canadian mod. which seems like more of a luxury than necessity. Over to you forum pundits now for an answer or two please!

Brian:confused:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

134

Send private message

By: dogsbody - 29th June 2008 at 05:12

Canada tried that, too. The image is from here:rcaf.com

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,945

Send private message

By: Peter - 17th June 2008 at 18:16

Slow to load but it works..!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

170

Send private message

By: Martti Kujansuu - 17th June 2008 at 18:12

I cant see it now tho, i have the little box with an X

How about now?

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/149/59965519ea9.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,023

Send private message

By: XH668 - 17th June 2008 at 16:39

I cant see it now tho, i have the little box with an X

668
________
No2 vaporizer reviews

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

170

Send private message

By: Martti Kujansuu - 17th June 2008 at 16:27

Can’t see the picture, but I’m almost sure you mean with SKIS, not skies, which is a plural form of word sky…

Just started to celebrate the midnight sun! 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,023

Send private message

By: XH668 - 17th June 2008 at 15:16

I corrected that for him, the picture was visible a few minutes ago…?

Still is for me
________
Pornstar Webcams

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,945

Send private message

By: Peter - 17th June 2008 at 14:56

I corrected that for him, the picture was visible a few minutes ago…?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

140

Send private message

By: Finny - 17th June 2008 at 14:53

Can’t see the picture, but I’m almost sure you mean with SKIS, not skies, which is a plural form of word sky…

Sign in to post a reply