September 3, 2007 at 9:59 pm

http://www.flickr.com/photos/61214504@N00/1219487947/in/set-72157600859401635/
I think it is…tailplane says no, but rest of it looks like a spit. A Stuka it definately isn’t.
Looks like a “CR” code?
By: adrian_gray - 4th September 2007 at 14:39
I couldn’t help wondering who the humorist was who hung the spinner on the prop blade…
Adrian
By: CSheppardholedi - 4th September 2007 at 14:13
Flipped through the collection on Flickr, that of an American 90mm artillary man it seems. The pics with the A/C are North Africa. One of the A/C wreckage does seem to start with QP(perhaps QF?-the second letter is patially missing.)
Captioning a bit on the wild side. They also show a PzKw MkIV (long 75mm) and call it a “German tank 88” Well it was a big gun that outshot the Sherman by a long ways….had to be an “88”!
Interesting colection.
By: Moggy C - 4th September 2007 at 11:09
The personnel do seem to be wearing baseball-type caps. Hardly common amongst British servicemen of the period, but very typical of US enlisted men.
Moggy
By: VoyTech - 4th September 2007 at 10:55
If the code is CP its 367FS, 9AF
if the code is CG its 38FS, 55FG, 8AF
The code might be QP (check the next photo on the site) which fits nicely with both the Americans and Spitfires.
By: Slummer - 3rd September 2007 at 22:25
Thanks all
Lindy’s lad: American unit would fit as photos are North Africa/Italy.
By: Lindy's Lad - 3rd September 2007 at 22:19
If the code is CP its 367FS, 9AF
if the code is CG its 38FS, 55FG, 8AF
according to http://www.btinternet.com/~lee_mail/rafcodes.html
American units?
definitely spitfire though
By: Matty - 3rd September 2007 at 22:15
Ahhh the Spitfire, known primarily for it’s lack of similarity to the Stuka.
Seriously, a Stuka?!!?
By: steve_p - 3rd September 2007 at 22:12
The only thing that it can be if it aint a Spit is a Seafire.
Best wishes
Steve P
By: contrailjj - 3rd September 2007 at 22:11
the simple answer
Yes… it is a Spit