January 4, 2014 at 4:17 pm
Iskander-E/M/K (300-2500km, CEP 3m) could become an anti-ship version?
Look here, we can clearly see Iskander better guidance system DF-21D
Система наведения смешанная: инерциальная на начальном и среднем участках полёта и оптическая (с использованием ГСН разработки ЦНИИАГ ) на конечном участке полёта, чем достигается высокая точность попадания 5—7 м. Возможно использование GPS / GLONASS в дополнение к инерциальной системе наведения .
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/iscander/iscander.shtml
С 2013 года в ВС России планируется поставить ракеты оснащённые системой РЭБ, обеспечивающей прикрытие ракеты на конечном участке полёта. Эта система включает в себя средства постановки пассивных и активных помех обзорным и стрельбовым РЛС противовоздушной и противоракетной обороны противника, посредством шумов и выброса ложных целей
Since 2013, in the Russian Armed Forces plan to put missiles equipped with electronic warfare system, providing cover missiles in the terminal phase of flight. This system includes means setting passive and active noise-firing and Surveillance radar and missile defense opponents by noise and emission decoys
translate: Mixed guidance system: inertial primary and secondary phases of flight and optical (using GOS development TSNIIAG) on the final leg of the flight, thus achieving the high accuracy rate of 5-7 m, the maximum use of GPS / GLONASS in addition to the inertial guidance system.
DF-21D (1400km): 惯性陀螺 + 弹载电脑 (Inertial + terminal radar guidance)
http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/东风-21中程弹道导弹
The integration of the Iskander with the R-500 subsonic cruise missile
system (known as the Iskander-K) wrapped up testing in 2009. It has a
range of approximately 2500 km and it is highly precise
By: El_Indigo - 25th January 2014 at 17:14
Again i’m not following you.
What does npomash have to do with context of what i’ve said.
Novator denied anything to do with Iskandar-K. And the fact that Iskandar is KB mashinostroyeniya product.
Are you confusing npomash with KB mashinostroyeniya or what ?
By: Jinan - 25th January 2014 at 12:25
What does npomash have to do with anything here ?
gyroscopic devices for missile complex «Iskander»
By: El_Indigo - 24th January 2014 at 14:40
What does npomash have to do with anything here ?
By: Jinan - 23rd January 2014 at 23:25
Novator denied anything to do with Iskandar-K. And the fact that Iskandar is KB mashinostroyeniya product.
http://www.npomash.ru/npom/en/default.htm
Not on this site as product
Just
Main products: gyroscopic attitude controllers and rate gyro package for launch vehicle «Souz-2», anti-ship missiles «Yakhont», «BrahMos», gyroscopic devices for missile complex «Iskander».
By: TR1 - 22nd January 2014 at 19:56
Exactly.
Though it is very humorous how even after spending its payload, the Tochka manages to further do damage to Georgian government property 😀 .
By: Mercurius - 22nd January 2014 at 18:51
I would phrase that as “the tail section of a spent Iskander landed on a Georgian military police Lada Niva after dispensing its submunition payload”.
By: medo - 22nd January 2014 at 17:15
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224836[/ATTACH]
Don’t underesimate your missiles. Here Tochka-U achieve direct hit on Georgian military police Lada Niva.
By: TR1 - 21st January 2014 at 21:54
Iskander was used in Georgia-Russia conflict 2008, combat: destroying 28 tanks
Ships like the DDG-51 or Nimitz, speed 56km / h, quite slower than T-72 tanks of Georgian speed of 60km / h, I think the Iskander-K / M completely against to warships
Complete baloney.
First of all, Iskander/Tochka were used to hit targets like military installations (naval facilities in one strike) and troop gathering points (for example a reserve gathering point was hit, and they promptly all ran away).
Even if they hit any tanks, they sure as hell were not moving, let alone @ 60km, which the T-72 :
1.) Can’t even do with any serious operational load
2.) No tank moves that fast in combat scenarios, even if technically it is possible. You think Georgian columns were racing at max speed through Tskinval? This is not the German Autobahn.
Georgian tank losses are pretty well documented, there is no way 28 of them were destroyed or even damaged by Iskander strikes.
By: El_Indigo - 21st January 2014 at 19:07
Novator denied anything to do with Iskandar-K. And the fact that Iskandar is KB mashinostroyeniya product.
By: Jinan - 20th January 2014 at 19:45
No, Novator has nothing whatsoever to to do with Iskandar-K cruise missile.
Well, enlighten us as to the cruise missile then: you know this how?
By: El_Indigo - 16th January 2014 at 16:35
most likely a variant of the Novator 3M-14 missile
No, Novator has nothing whatsoever to to do with Iskandar-K cruise missile.
By: Mercurius - 16th January 2014 at 13:06
Iskander was used in Georgia-Russia conflict 2008, combat: destroying 28 tanks
Ships like the DDG-51 or Nimitz, speed 56km / h, quite slower than T-72 tanks of Georgian speed of 60km / h, I think the Iskander-K / M completely against to warships
To the best of my knowledge, the tanks in question were not moving, but were parked in a battalion-level facility. They were probably destroyed by a submunition payload.
By: blackadam - 14th January 2014 at 01:51
Iskander is a history of repeated Pershing II?
Pershing II as I know, it is a medium-range ballistic missile system radar and inertial navigation. Radar navigation system it is unique to the present. But E/O & INS + Glonass as Iskander is great in the right weather and daylight conditions, a radar seeker as in Pershing II could be jammed
By: Jinan - 6th January 2014 at 19:40
M is equipped with inertial and optical guidance systems for improved firing accuracy and electro-optical seeker for self-homing capability. Accuracy of M is 5-7 meters with optical homing head….
The Iskander-M is equipped with a self-contained inertial navigation system (INS) and an optically guided warhead. The optical homing head can also be controlled from an airborne warning and control system (AWACS) or an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). This feature provides a self-homing capability to the missile. Targets can be identified by satellite, aircraft, conventional intelligence centre or a soldier. After receiving the images of the target, the onboard computer of the missile locks onto the target with its sight and directs the warhead towards the target at supersonic speed.
http://www.armyrecognition.com/russia_russian_missile_system_vehicle_uk/ss-26_iskander_iskander-m_9k720_9p78e_9t250e_stone_tactical_ballistic_missile_russian_army_russia_te.html
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/iksander-system/
By: blackadam - 6th January 2014 at 14:43
Iskander K probably could, it’s really just a cruise missile at the end of the day, and if you really want you can give it mid course correction and terminal guidance to strike at ships. It’ll basically be a Tomahawk Anti Ship Missile, but not offer any drastically new capability.
Iskander M, the ballistic missile variant, probably could be modified to be an AShBM like DF-21D, as long as you give it midcoruse correction and MaRV. But its range is far shorter than DF-21D, whose range has actually be estimated to be anywhere from 1,400km to 2,700 km, so the Iskander M’s 400km range is not very impressive as an anti ship weapon.
as i know Tomahawk can use to anti ship role, with variant TASM ! Russia is possible if you want to increase the range. Iskander M is used for export and limited scope for this
By: Blitzo - 6th January 2014 at 03:00
ok, but it can use to anti ship role ?
Iskander K probably could, it’s really just a cruise missile at the end of the day, and if you really want you can give it mid course correction and terminal guidance to strike at ships. It’ll basically be a Tomahawk Anti Ship Missile, but not offer any drastically new capability.
Iskander M, the ballistic missile variant, probably could be modified to be an AShBM like DF-21D, as long as you give it midcoruse correction and MaRV. But its range is far shorter than DF-21D, whose range has actually be estimated to be anywhere from 1,400km to 2,700 km, so the Iskander M’s 400km range is not very impressive as an anti ship weapon.
By: blackadam - 6th January 2014 at 02:52
Iskander K is a cruise missile variant (R-500 cruise missile – most likely a variant of the Novator 3M-14 missile – rather than the 9M723K1 ballistic missile), featuring an extended range of up to 2,000 kilometers. It is not a ballistic missile (K stands for krylataya or “winged”). 4 rather than 2 are carried on the vehicle.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224272[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224273[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224274[/ATTACH]
ok, but it can use to anti ship role ?
By: Jinan - 5th January 2014 at 20:16
Iskander K is a cruise missile variant (R-500 cruise missile – most likely a variant of the Novator 3M-14 missile – rather than the 9M723K1 ballistic missile), featuring an extended range of up to 2,000 kilometers. It is not a ballistic missile (K stands for krylataya or “winged”). 4 rather than 2 are carried on the vehicle.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224272[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224273[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224274[/ATTACH]
By: blackadam - 4th January 2014 at 16:51
Iskander was used in Georgia-Russia conflict 2008, combat: destroying 28 tanks
Ships like the DDG-51 or Nimitz, speed 56km / h, quite slower than T-72 tanks of Georgian speed of 60km / h, I think the Iskander-K / M completely against to warships