September 7, 2004 at 7:12 am
I was reading an interesting article in Jane’s FR that talked about a rumored Israeli superweapon, capable of destroying Egyptian and Syrian armed assets in a matter of minutes. Thwe weapon is under construction or about to be completed, and is known only as ‘the Project’ Whether it actually exists is another question, but it first came to light over the entrapment and torture of one reserve artillery officer, Tannenbaum.
thoughts, anyone?
By: Erez - 20th September 2004 at 10:46
Who needs nukes, we got God at our side 😉
Really, I think it’s safe to assume that we do have nuclear weapons. The French people that worked here probably leaked information about it too.
By: ohadbx - 17th September 2004 at 15:24
Erez- well, I dont.
If you want to compare believing in Israel having nukes to believing in god you are just prooving my point. Maybe Israel has a “Holy Nuke”? 🙂
By: Karna - 17th September 2004 at 08:42
Theological discussions are not within the charter of the fiorum.:p
By: Erez - 16th September 2004 at 22:55
Do you believe in god?, if you do, show me a proof that he exists 😉
By: ohadbx - 16th September 2004 at 22:54
Erez- if all those sources had ANY type of access to this kind of information I would have considered listening to them. But they dont…. so why bother?
Israel did not denay nor confirmed this information and no hard facts has been published by anyone- so how can you (or me) as a mere simple man can say true or false?
By: Erez - 13th September 2004 at 22:07
Erez- Israel having nukes is currently only a rumor- with no hard facts to support it. There is no point of discussing it, as you might as well be discussing about Sumalia having a Klingon spaceship. (Actually Im really surprized that someone like you is making such a statement so blindly).
Well Ohad, Israel having nukes is more of an open secret. We don’t say we have it, but you better know we do 😀
By: google - 13th September 2004 at 15:29
my impression is that it’s prob. not nuclear.
By: Arabella-Cox - 13th September 2004 at 15:24
luke skywalker and his light sabre…
By: F5M - 12th September 2004 at 00:08
Erez- Israel having nukes is currently only a rumor- with no hard facts to support it. There is no point of discussing it, as you might as well be discussing about Sumalia having a Klingon spaceship. (Actually Im really surprized that someone like you is making such a statement so blindly).
As for the weapons- the information given is wayyy too general to make any assumptions. It could also be the guided MLRS or other stuff like that.
Rumor supported by many nuclear , military strategistis around the world inlcuinf the International Nuclear Agency Control which doesnt have total freedon inside Israel as well as that israeli arrested at Israel for revealing Israel has a nuclear program . And Israel itself never assumed or denyed it .
By: ohadbx - 11th September 2004 at 12:12
Erez- Israel having nukes is currently only a rumor- with no hard facts to support it. There is no point of discussing it, as you might as well be discussing about Sumalia having a Klingon spaceship. (Actually Im really surprized that someone like you is making such a statement so blindly).
As for the weapons- the information given is wayyy too general to make any assumptions. It could also be the guided MLRS or other stuff like that.
By: Erez - 9th September 2004 at 22:07
Reactors, or warheads?
Reactors – two known ones:
Dimona – large reactor.
Nahal Sorek – research reactor.
Warheads – between 150-300.
By: over G - 8th September 2004 at 22:57
nuke?
About that how many nuclear reactors have israel???, i have read that they have 100 nukes???, i doubth even 10, but that depends of their nuclear infrastructure, so how many recators have???
By: F-18 Hamburger - 8th September 2004 at 18:47
Hamburger, I know you aren’t an antisemite, but it seems like this picture has antisemitism in it. It’s not just Sharon that fires, but the star of david that sybolizes the Jewish nation and make it look like a symbol of the devil.
That’s pretty insulting.
sorry my Erect friend, did not mean to promote anti sentimesim
By: Hyperwarp - 8th September 2004 at 17:15
Hamburger, I know you aren’t an antisemite, but it seems like this picture has antisemitism in it. It’s not just Sharon that fires, but the star of david that sybolizes the Jewish nation and make it look like a symbol of the devil.
That’s pretty insulting.
Yeah, I have to agree with Erez there. It would be appropriate if the “star of david” is removed from that pic.
By: Erez - 8th September 2004 at 13:17
Hamburger, I know you aren’t an antisemite, but it seems like this picture has antisemitism in it. It’s not just Sharon that fires, but the star of david that sybolizes the Jewish nation and make it look like a symbol of the devil.
That’s pretty insulting.
By: alexz33 - 8th September 2004 at 05:18
Well that explain why Israel is importing all natural gas all of a sudden.
By: F-18 Hamburger - 7th September 2004 at 20:51
nuke?
very close, but actually it’s a giant Ariel Sharon that breathes nuclear fire
:diablo:
By: google - 7th September 2004 at 17:27
maybe the Tannenbaum guy made it up in the heat of torture.
True, that could also very well be.
By: wd1 - 7th September 2004 at 16:45
maybe the Tannenbaum guy made it up in the heat of torture.
By: phrozenflame - 7th September 2004 at 15:39
http://www.defencetalk.com/news/publish/article_001800.shtml ? :dev2: