January 20, 2010 at 11:59 am
Thank God for the voters of Massachusetts.
The President’s domestic agenda is dead.
Hope for freedom still exists.
By: J Boyle - 20th January 2010 at 14:45
Stop wasting your keystrokes…on this topic…and many others…Grey Area knows what’s best for all. 😀
Let’s get him going on his athiest rant…that’s always fun. 😀
Fact: 85% of Americans have health care coverage of some kind…usually through work.
The trick here is to cover the rest WITHOUT messing it up for the other 85% (or bankrupting the country).
National health care works great in small and healthy countries like Sweden. But in the US, where there a lot of problems…and millions of illegals (and more coming in every day…they just announced a plan to let thousands of Hatian illegals stay inthe country for 18 months…do you really think they’ll go back when their time is up?)…it may not work as well.
Again, most conservatives aren’t against health coverage, but would like to see a better plan that the one being crafted by the liberals behind closed doors.
By: Sky High - 20th January 2010 at 14:39
I saw this elsewhere posted by a US citizen, Republican obviously, but nevertherless that point of view is fairly clear.
“His health care plan has been a disaster. The majority of Americans are against it. The buy offs to states like Nebraska and unions is a disgrace. Our health care cost will go up, not down or even stay the same and not to mention bankrupt the nation. Our quality will go down as well. The way the Democrats have handled this issue is a disgrace.”
By: Sky High - 20th January 2010 at 13:46
Grey Area
By the way, people from the USA are often surprised to learn that there is also a thriving private sector in UK health care.
Indeed and where, I wonder, would the NHS be without the thriving private sector. At the last count 7 million people had health insurance and just to make sure our Amercian friends do not misunderstand, these 7 million pay twice, once through their taxes for the NHS and again for their health insurance. If the insurance is paid for by their employer then they are taxed on the benefit, anyway.
By: Grey Area - 20th January 2010 at 13:38
Every American has health care….and all the illegals too. It is against the law for an emergency room to turn someone away who needs medical care.
It’s just not free, ie., it has a cost and the person receiving the care is supposed to pay for it.
Healthcare in the UK isn’t free either.
The NHS is paid for through direct taxation. We seldom think of it as compulsory medical insurance, for some reason.
By the way, people from the USA are often surprised to learn that there is also a thriving private sector in UK health care.
By: Moggy C - 20th January 2010 at 13:27
I think I understand
You are happy that everybody now has the freedom not to be able to afford health care.
Excellent.
A bright shining new dawn indeed.
Moggy
By: Ship 741 - 20th January 2010 at 13:13
Oh Moggy.
Of course it’s a good thing. By denying free health care to all, people like Ship 741 can, as one who has, look down on those who have not, with a feeling of superiority.
“one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
Indivisible except by the dollar and with liberty and justice for those who can afford a good lawyer.
Regards,
kev35
Thank you for at least saying “free,” most people say, “denying health care” which is not the same.
FYI, most of the amublance chasing lawyers work on commission…ie., you don’t need any money to hire them. After they get their huge court settlement, the costs are passed on to everyone else.
By: Ship 741 - 20th January 2010 at 13:11
Every American has health care….and all the illegals too. It is against the law for an emergency room to turn someone away who needs medical care.
It’s just not free, ie., it has a cost and the person receiving the care is supposed to pay for it.
In other words, everyone who lives a decent lifestyle doesn’t have to subsidize the lifestyles of those who endanger themselves through drugs, unsafe sex, etc.
By: Grey Area - 20th January 2010 at 13:07
“one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
What are you? Some kind of communist? :diablo:
By: Sky High - 20th January 2010 at 13:03
Frankvw
“While a socialised healthcare works and is necessary here.”
Mmm – up to a point, but it doesn’t half need a make-over! But your comments about the differences in culture are well made. Most Brits are seeing the problem through their eyes and whereas there would always be a majority vote here for a form of NHS, the split is close to 50/50 in the USA.
By: frankvw - 20th January 2010 at 12:56
It is freedom indeed, freedom to choose if you want a healthcare plan, or not.
Guys, the USA isn’t Europe. things work otherwise, mentalities are different. While a socialised healthcare works and is necessary here, it will not necessarily work there. It would rather bankrupt the country totally.
It is good news in the way that democracy works, and that the same party will not control the oval office and both houses on Capitol Hill.
By: kev35 - 20th January 2010 at 12:36
Oh Moggy.
Of course it’s a good thing. By denying free health care to all, people like Ship 741 can, as one who has, look down on those who have not, with a feeling of superiority.
“one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
Indivisible except by the dollar and with liberty and justice for those who can afford a good lawyer.
Regards,
kev35
By: Sky High - 20th January 2010 at 12:32
Thank God for the voters of Massachusetts.
The President’s domestic agenda is dead.
Hope for freedom still exists.
Well it will certainly have brought a sense of reality into the lives of those who still felt the sun shone out of Obama’s ****. He hadn’t a chance to live up to the embarrassing hype of a year ago and he has, so far, said a lot but done little and is looking at a popularity rating below 50%. His inexperience has told so now perhaps a period of reflection will steady him for his next two years, because hat’s the most he has if he wants to be ready for a second term.
By: Moggy C - 20th January 2010 at 12:13
As I understand it, poor Brit that I am, the ‘domestic agenda’ talked of was some kind of health cover for everybody?
So not having health cover and ‘freedom’ are one and the same?
Ok, great. I am sure we are all very pleased. :confused:
Moggy