New logo New Vision…….The new scheme for Jat Airways successor to the venerable Jugoslovenski Aerotransport JAT. According to thr latest issue of the Jat Airways in flight mag this new ID coincides with the formation of the new Union of Serbia and Montenegro. I’m not sure if it will suit the DC10! Over to you guys.
By: tenthije - 29th July 2003 at 18:23
Is that the link? Could be, I have heard 3 or 4 stories and the story of AL changing to Hola came up most… therefore I figured that was the best answer. 😀
I stand corrected!
By: A330Crazy - 29th July 2003 at 18:17
Originally posted by tenthije
before you start, Air Littoral is the original name for Hola Airlines. The just haven’t bothered repainting it yet)
I thought this partucular 737 was leased by Air Littoral from Hola Airlines?
By: tenthije - 29th July 2003 at 18:13
You mean this one?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=114719
Who need a.net anyway? 😀
(before you start, Air Littoral is the original name for Hola Airlines. The just haven’t bothered repainting it yet)
By: LBARULES - 29th July 2003 at 18:03
My god that liveries awful.
But if you want to see really bad search for Hola Airlines on Airliners.net
By: mongu - 29th July 2003 at 00:45
Don’t be so pessimistic. A lot of the “budget” airlines have colourful schemes. You only have to look at Buzz or Easyjet.
By: Ren Frew - 28th July 2003 at 23:21
Originally posted by wysiwyg
I wonder if it’s got something to do with the fact that predominantly white aircraft are cheaper to return back to all white when you need to return the aircraft back to the leasing agents?
I think that says it all, in a few years time I reckon 99% of airlines will be flying white planes.
By: mongu - 28th July 2003 at 22:56
Yeah, but the tail is the advert. There’s no harm having a plain fuselage if the tail says something. But….dots?!!?
By: wysiwyg - 28th July 2003 at 22:08
I wonder if it’s got something to do with the fact that predominantly white aircraft are cheaper to return back to all white when you need to return the aircraft back to the leasing agents?
By: MapleLeaf_330 - 28th July 2003 at 16:45
I don’t understand the point of this new scheme. Hmmm.
By: A330Crazy - 28th July 2003 at 09:52
Nice rendition Matt.
By: Saab 2000 - 28th July 2003 at 09:11
The designs that they had as other options seemed much better, what ever happened to them?
By: KabirT - 28th July 2003 at 07:08
pathetic
By: mongu - 27th July 2003 at 23:42
Rubbish.
By: MINIDOH - 27th July 2003 at 23:03
terrible! bloody spot on the tail. id be ashamed to even consider it! (British Airways, please bring back youre Landor colours!)
By: steve rowell - 27th July 2003 at 22:10
Not very inspiring.
By: A330Crazy - 27th July 2003 at 20:09
Out of all the possible c/s that you could vote for on the JAT website… This one clinched it! Pah! What a load of rubbish!
By: MSR777 - 27th July 2003 at 19:55
I agree, the old “Red Ellipse” livery was vastly superior. Apparently the little red dot symbolises the line that, quote “I want to fly Jat Airways period” unquote. Still at least they are having a go-I guess.
By: tenthije - 27th July 2003 at 19:52
Will they really be adopting these colours? Air France is more colourfull! Surely this is the name “colour scheme” not worthy? My little brother could have thought of something like this. Just keep the old livery!
By: Saab 2000 - 27th July 2003 at 19:45
Yet another livery update fails miserably. You would of thought that the changes the country is going through both in terms of identity and politically would possibly help materialise a more significant and inspirational livery to reflect a new era. But no, it is literally just total rubbish. Some trivial circles that don’t even come close to reflecting anything to do with the airline and a simple font that is so customary these days. The livery is meaningless and inferior to other Eastern European carriers. What a huge disappointment!
Sign In
July 27, 2003 at 7:28 pm