dark light

JU.87, err 88… to be salvaged.

Navy tug serving as salvage platform for Junkers aircraft
The “Spiekeroog” will serve as a dive base during the salvage of a German Junkers JU 87 aircraft off Rügen, starting on June 5, 2012. About 50 persons will be involved in the operation. The aircraft is then to be restored and later displayed at the Museum of Military History on the air base Berlin-Gatow. The wreck was traced off Sassnitz and will be lifted within ten days.

Couldn’t find any previous references to this find in ‘search’.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,360

Send private message

By: Bager1968 - 19th June 2012 at 00:21

Ju88…..The water around there must have poor visibility:diablo:

Possibly, but the report is that only one engine and part of one wing were above the mud… with the fuselage, other wing, and other engine buried.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

202

Send private message

By: fighterace - 17th June 2012 at 22:31

Ju88…..The water around there must have poor visibility:diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 16th June 2012 at 20:05

Of course, one does not know the circumstances of the dive and discovery, but it seems quite surprising that the wreck was not identified as an 88 much earlier on. Even if the wreckage was broken up there would be ample and sufficient material (I’d have thought) to get a type i/d quite early on. Very thoughtfully the Germans marked cast components with embossed 87, 88, 118…or whatever. And there is usually a profusion of such material on a site like this.

Not a criticism. Just a surprised observation.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,685

Send private message

By: hampden98 - 16th June 2012 at 17:56

On the subject of Stukas does anyone have a Stuka Siren?
Would make a great airshow exhibit and attraction.
Bit like the static Merlin and Griffon engine exhibits.
Would love to hear one wound up!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 16th June 2012 at 17:27

Salvage work has now stopped pending a re-assessment of the logistics.

Aircraft wreck not Ju 87 – salvage work suspended
The “Spiekeroog” suspended its salvage work on a WW II bomber off Ruegen on June 15 after it was found out that the wreckage belongs to a Junkers Ju 88 and not Ju 87. This was found out on June 14 during investigations of the wreckage which was recovered so far. The Ju 88 is much larger, and so it is thought that large remains are still stuck in the mud. The salvage of such a large plane is not possible for the Navy tug. The debris field in a water depth of 18 metres is much larger than presumed. The hull and the complete left part with one motor was not yet found. There was no decision yet whether these will also be salvaged. Divers concentrated on tracing remains of the bodies until the evening.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

76

Send private message

By: Kiteflyer - 15th June 2012 at 21:17

Looks like they are thinking that it may be an 88 rather than 87 now;

http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/technik/ostsee-stuka-wrack-entpuppt-sich-als-junkers-ju-88-a-839175.html

Jeff

Just realised Jeepman had already posted to this effect…………

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 15th June 2012 at 19:50

Photo here of the recovered engine;
http://www.mz-web.de/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=ksta/page&atype=ksArtikel&aid=1339311279631&openMenu=1013083806405&calledPageId=1013083806405&listid=1018881578737

Further down the page is a link to more pictures ~ mostly of divers though.
I have seen a picture of a gravity knife brought up but can’t find the link now.

Geoff

Here:

http://www.mz-web.de/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=ksta/page&atype=ksArtikel&aid=1339413093203

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,647

Send private message

By: jeepman - 15th June 2012 at 19:40

Apparently the Stuka is actually a Ju88……

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501714_162-57453860/wwii-plane-wreck-not-stuka-but-larger-ju88/

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,142

Send private message

By: paulmcmillan - 12th June 2012 at 17:20

They have raised radiator now which they say indicates a Ju-87G rather than a Dora anyway only fuselage and right wing and part of left to go

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

76

Send private message

By: Kiteflyer - 12th June 2012 at 07:44

Photo here of the recovered engine;
http://www.mz-web.de/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=ksta/page&atype=ksArtikel&aid=1339311279631&openMenu=1013083806405&calledPageId=1013083806405&listid=1018881578737

Further down the page is a link to more pictures ~ mostly of divers though.
I have seen a picture of a gravity knife brought up but can’t find the link now.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 11th June 2012 at 19:48

Update.

Engine of Stuka bomber recovered

On June 9, the engine of a German Junkers Ju 87 ‘Stuka’ dive bomber was unloaded from the “Spiekeroog” in Sassnitz. German military divers are working to hoist the wreck of the bomber from the floor of the Baltic Sea. The Stuka wreck, first discovered in the 1990s when a fisherman’s nets snagged on it, lies about 10 kilometers off the coast of Ruegen, in about 18 meters of water. The divers have been working over the past week to prepare the bomber to be hoisted to the surface, using fire hoses to carefully free it from the sand. They have already brought up smaller pieces and also hauled up its motor over the weekend. They are now working to free the main 9-meter fuselage piece and expect to bring it up on Tuesday, depending on the weather. The operation is run by the German Military Historical Museum in Dresden. Initial reports were that the wreck was in good condition despite having spent the last seven decades at the bottom of the sea. The restoration crew said it was in really good condition for being restored. So far, little is known about this particular plane – when it crashed, who its pilot and gunner were and whether they survived the crash. Once the plane is brought to the surface, researchers will use the serial number to track down all of the information.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

337

Send private message

By: Supermarine305 - 3rd June 2012 at 17:25

Taken from Paul’s link:

“Then the men want to flush the machine free to hold small parts and then cut off the wings,” says an army spokesman.

I wonder whether that is an entirely good idea……….

Quite barbaric actually. The Norwegians managed to lift a sunken plane without lopping the wings off. And it was a much larger type too.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,647

Send private message

By: jeepman - 3rd June 2012 at 17:21

Taken from Paul’s link:

“Then the men want to flush the machine free to hold small parts and then cut off the wings,” says an army spokesman.

I wonder whether that is an entirely good idea……….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,142

Send private message

By: paulmcmillan - 3rd June 2012 at 17:11

Picture of wreckage in situ here

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.welt.de/…

you may need to click through the photos

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 2nd June 2012 at 07:15

Well, glad you understood that, I didn’t! 😮 My information came from a shipping forum.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

679

Send private message

By: DaveM2 - 1st June 2012 at 23:58

Thanks!

Dave

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

679

Send private message

By: DaveM2 - 1st June 2012 at 23:43

Navy tug serving as salvage platform for Junkers aircraft
The “Spiekeroog” will serve as a dive base during the salvage of a German Junkers JU 87 aircraft off Rügen, starting on June 5, 2012. About 50 persons will be involved in the operation. The aircraft is then to be restored and later displayed at the Museum of Military History on the air base Berlin-Gatow. The wreck was traced off Sassnitz and will be lifted within ten days.

Couldn’t find any previous references to this find in ‘search’.

Hi NF

What is the source of this info?

regards
Dave

Sign in to post a reply