L39 forced lands near Duxford – ‘pilot uninjured’

Didn’t some deranged fan of hers break into her house, tie her to a chair and beat the living ****out of her?
The geese are probably more worried when they see the coach of the fanclub than when there’s aircraft passing by.
🙂

http://www.pudkin.co.uk/Germaine%20greer.htm

eh? What?

“publicity seeking australian jade goody”

hahaha

These people like her.

http://www.dogbomb.co.uk/board/showthread.php?threadid=3929

‘Arse-faced weasel’ is pretty good…..

Originally posted by Snapper
She’s on Clive James as well.

Poor old boy, that can’t be very pleasant for him.

She’s on Clive James as well.

Quote:-
“The deaths weren’t even mentioned in the national news. I for one am not grateful that no shadow was cast across that loveliest of days. Such callousness appals me.”

I don’t know about anyone else but the spell-checker on my computer rang up ‘appals’ immediately… Spelling mistakes in one apparently so educated and well-spoken!!! 😀

But on a more serious note I would be very worried about some one who seems to trade on her criticism of the media for her job (don’t know what else she does other than newspaper columns and that thing on Newsnight on Friday evenings) who did not see – no matter what you might think of it – the film of the accident which was on several channels that day. I suppose she’ll wait for the review of the year progs to enlighten her… :rolleyes:

Flood

stupid woman and stupid telegraph for publishing such drivel,

i sent them an email telling them what i thought……wonder if they’ll reply 🙂

If it’s any consolation, the Telegraph published a response from Ted Inman to her first outburst, on 30 July.

He said, in summary, that the decision to continue flying after the crash was not taken lightly or callously, and was taken after consulting all the display pilots.

If you want to read his letter you’ll need to log in to the DT’s site, after searching for ‘Ted Inman’.

“Snapper – you have a fantastic way with words!!”

Indeed I have. I can use my mouth in a myriad of ways that would leave Ms Subsider incredulous.

Pity someone cannot arrange for a 617 sqn Gr4 to show her what a real high speed, low level pass sounds like. That would put PA 474’s flypast into perspective.

This drivel in the Torygraph as well? thought she was more of a Guardian type…

Snapper – you have a fantastic way with words!! 😀

I think if she doesn’t wear pants, and she was wearing girl-clothing on her big old hips, the propwash from 4 Merlins at tree-top height would have given her severe undercarriage problems, perhaps even damaging her flaps when they flew up and smacked into the spinners.

Anyway, she wouldn’t have been troubled if she was inside baking a cake, would she? I’ll tell you what she needs. A bit of hunility and a husband. She is quite clearly frustrated.

I think that the duty officer should be applauded for his/her quick perception on realising that he/she was dealing with a self opinionated aroggant old Dyke who somehow deludes herself into thinking that the RAF and the BBMF set out to simulate a dambuster style bombing run on her in particular I can’t believe the heroism of the pilot!!! to turn back under heavy flak or fist waving at the risk of her recommending him for castration well he deserves a medal :p 🙂

PS I hope her knees get better:rolleyes:

I believe Prof. Greer professes not to wear pants, saggy or otherwise 😀

We should write old droopyteated saggyflaps a letter telling her that, um, we, er don’t share her views.

And that she is talking out of her saggy old pants. If she complains about wartime bombers again, she should think first about the fact that some bombers were freeing birds way before she discovered she was a rug-munching horse-lookalike.

I mean of course the B24 Liberate ‘er.

Skanky old bitch.

Professor Greer should realise she has had her day. Only a handful of academics give a monkeys what she thinks about Lancasters or anything else 😀

Do you think Germaine Greer would be able to tell a Lancaster from a 747 or a c130 I think not!

I think it should be made law that all estate agents list any airfields within say ten miles of a property when selling it. Then when we get some miserable b****** complaining about their peace being disturbed we can point out that the airfield has been there considerably longer than them. They were made aware of it and should have bought some where else if they weren’t prepared to accept the aircraft.

So there ……aarrgghhh…I’m annoyed now.

I suppose this could result in the natural selection of aviation biased people within the immediate area . Cool

Just did a quick bit of looking, and yes, droopytiits did make all those comments here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/gardening/main.jhtml?xml=/gardening/2003/08/02/ggerm02.xml&sSheet=/gardening/2003/08/02/ixgmain.html

with a bit more here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/gardening/main.jhtml?xml=/gardening/2003/07/19/ggerm19.xml

Silly old cow.

Tomorrow Never Dies