dark light

  • brokkie

Landing Gear Identification needed

Recently a friend of mine bought three similar landing gear items at a farm auction near Moreton-in-Marsh, Glos. and we are having trouble identifying them so can anyone help us please.

The tyres although badly perished have the AERO marking and a PA47 stamp, the size looks to be 8.00 x 7.25. The wheel hub has a serial no. of HF46727 and is stamped with DRG No.10223/2. The aluminium cast bracket halfway down the olio is stamped with the number 28526 and it looks as though it is stamped with WH No DG 22261.

Any info regarding aircraft type, possible manufacturer and approx. date would be a great help, I look forward to hearing from anyone who can help.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

199

Send private message

By: wcfcfan - 24th October 2008 at 13:08

Brokkie,

PM sent

Steve

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 24th October 2008 at 12:54

Simple.

Start a restoration to flight – he’s well along the way already 😀

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3

Send private message

By: brokkie - 24th October 2008 at 12:50

Thanks to everyone who replied and helped us to identify the landing gear, my friend now has the problem of what he is going to do with them.

Thanks once again.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

469

Send private message

By: Joglo - 21st October 2008 at 09:40

Brilliant film Wellington and a very interesting website!

Whilst watching it, I began thinking of the other man/woman hours that went into making all the parts that they assembled, even the fabric.

Not a good thing for me to be doing at this time of day.:eek:

NB: Bullet proof fuel tanks, something that Concorde could have done with having.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

400

Send private message

By: Wellington285 - 21st October 2008 at 01:25

They do look like Wellington tailwheels. Ian’s picture convinces me that they are, and that the Serial No. 28526 mentiond by Brokkie is a Wellington Serial No.

The link below if it works, shows a video of the Wellington being built in record time, 8 minutes in it shows the tailwheel.
G.

http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/focuson/film/film-archive/player.asp?catID=2&subCatID=7&filmID=8

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,731

Send private message

By: ian_ - 20th October 2008 at 22:53

Here’s a cheeky scan that lovely 4+ book. Looks pretty convincingly wellington.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 20th October 2008 at 21:37

Seeing as the units came from Moreton, why not talk to the Wellington Aviation museum down the road? They might be able to shed some light.

http://www.wellingtonaviation.org

I’d venture they’re off a Wimpey although I know there were a few Hamilcar’s being used as shed’s/chicken coops in the area post-war.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,313

Send private message

By: John Aeroclub - 20th October 2008 at 19:12

I have just looked at close up photos of the Wellington tail wheels in the 4+ book, and they are identical to the later type in all respects. The horseshoe shackle at the top is the retract fitting.

John

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 20th October 2008 at 18:14

Oh dear, I really should not be so quick to hit the “submit” button.

Now the day’s work is finished and I have had a chance to review things, I realise that the Wellington and Hamilcar shared the same pattern of tail wheel, AH10223, so we’re back to square one!

I must admit, the model version that Joglo pointed us to is quite similar to the ones in the photo…so maybe it is Wellington after all? 😮

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 20th October 2008 at 15:49

The wheel hub has a serial no. of HF46727 and is stamped with DRG No.10223/2.

Actually, brokkie, I replied very quickly to your post as I was doing some work outside and didn’t want to lose the weather.

Now I’ve re-read it, I can confirm that the Hamilcar tail wheel is Dunlop drawing AH10223.

I claim the prize! 😎

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 20th October 2008 at 15:18

Too small for Wimpey IMHO, I had a Wimpey T/W for a while and it was bigger than that!

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,395

Send private message

By: Cees Broere - 20th October 2008 at 15:11

I believe that they are Wellington too but for later versions, the early one was much fatter. The mounting of the tailwheellegs are similar to the Wellington as well.

cheers

Cees

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

469

Send private message

By: Joglo - 20th October 2008 at 12:23

I know this is only a kit part of a scale model Wimpey, but the part does look similar.
Click on u/c legs pic to enlarge:
http://www.armorama.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Reviews&file=index&req=showcontent&id=1982

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 20th October 2008 at 11:45

They don’t look chunky, or sophisticated enough to be Wellington units (and weren’t they all retractable anyway?)

I think your pal might have Hamilcar tail wheel units.

The tyre size and code PA47 is correct, as per the relevant bit of A.P.1086.

The Museum of Army Flying at Middle Wallop, or the Assault Glider Trust may be able to confirm my guess. They may also be interested in acquiring them!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

66

Send private message

By: Ballykellybrat - 20th October 2008 at 10:49

Look like Wellington tail wheels to me. Moreton was a Wellington OTU for most of the war.
Bill

Sign in to post a reply