dark light

Liberation.

Sixty eight years ago today, the Red Army liberated Auschwitz.
What they found there (and of course in other places too) changed the way we view the World.
Don’t ever let anyone try and convince you that Nazism had any good points–it didn’t..!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,212

Send private message

By: paul178 - 1st February 2013 at 19:01

While I will never willingly step foot in Japan out of personal ground due to their continued merciless slaughter of whales and dolphins (the latter being utterly needless and completely barbaric), I do not hold them accountable for the atrocities visiting upon the victims in the 40s.

Life is too short. Life must go on.

Agree entirely!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 1st February 2013 at 12:56

That concerns me far less than countries guilty of human rights violations. But if we baulked at visiting or having dealings with nations whose human and/or animal practices we disagreed with there would certainly be huge saving in air miles!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 1st February 2013 at 12:43

While I will never willingly step foot in Japan out of personal ground due to their continued merciless slaughter of whales and dolphins (the latter being utterly needless and completely barbaric), I do not hold them accountable for the atrocities visiting upon the victims in the 40s.

Whilst I agree wholeheartedly with you regarding the whales and dolphins issue, it’s not something that stops me from going to Japan. Talking to ordinary Japanese people, you will very often find them to be against it. If you come across somebody who isn’t, you can help – even if it just a little bit – by registering your disapproval. Open minds take notice.

I’m wondering whether you would refuse to go Norway, Iceland, Greenland, South Korea, Russia, Canada and the United States – amongst others – for the same reason?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 1st February 2013 at 12:31

Believe me, I’m not at all under any misapprehension. I have very thoroughly re-read Oppama’s comments: 27, 34, 40, 53, 57,67, 79. Why am I left with a clear impression that he is on one side of this debate and I am on another?

You appear to be both sides of the debate at various times in the thread, and sometimes even in the same post. You have convinced yourself that I’m some sort of revisionist and apologist, and I’m on the side of the particular “Japs” ( as you insist – quite archly – in calling them ) who committed atrocities. I’m not. It’s in your head….

I note that he does not deal with my specific points about recorded instances of Japanese atrocities including 731.

Exactly how am I not ‘dealing’ with them? They are a matter of record, and cannot be denied. I abhor them. What do you expect me to do, play ‘Atrocity Top Trumps’ with you?

So, ‘Totally insane’ ? That satisfactorily explains the murderous medical experimentation of Unit 731 – does it? I think ‘totally inadequate’ is my riposte.

Frankly, any words a man can write will not be adequate. I don’t know where you want to go with all of this, but I rather suspect that it’ll be a case of me going to Tenerife and you going to Elevenarife.

Your “vermin” and “can a leopard change its spots?” comments would appear to be suggesting that the propensity for the commission of such crimes against humanity is directly linked to race, or more specifically a certain nationality. You infer that the Japanese ( your “Japs” ) have it in their DNA to do such things. Any well rounded human being – let alone an anthropologist – would tell you that such potential is in any Homo Sapiens, as has been proved time and time again – and probably will continue to be proved over and over again. And as I’ve said before on this thread, if you are ready to believe that one nationality, one race, one creed or whatever are “untermenschen” or “vermin” ( or “Sino Chankoro” as the Imperialist Japanese were taught to think of the Chinese ) then you are tilling the soil for the seeding of the next crop of atrocities.

Please do not trouble yourself with a reply.

Too late. I’m going to ask you once again to clarify and/or withdraw your “vermin that live in the Far East” comment. You’ve had some of your previous xenophobic and racist posts on this forum removed by Moderators in the past, and I think that one is something they should look at also.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 1st February 2013 at 07:48

I’d like to throw my two pence into the pot.

I don’t think we can hold present day Germany and Japan for the atrocities of their past. A whole generation has grown up after and started the next generation since then.
This new generation have nothing to do with what their grand parents did.
Both countries have become major contributors to the world in technology, education, commerce, etc.

While I will never willingly step foot in Japan out of personal ground due to their continued merciless slaughter of whales and dolphins (the latter being utterly needless and completely barbaric), I do not hold them accountable for the atrocities visiting upon the victims in the 40s.

Life is too short. Life must go on.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,560

Send private message

By: Al - 1st February 2013 at 00:29

We all know wars start over territory, minerals, oil, water, etc, and these commodities will dwindle in different parts of the world at different times in the coming decades.
The human population is exploding exponentially, and just isn’t sustainable. For example, there are more people alive in India today than there was in the entire world around 1850. A world population of 7 billion is already three times the sustainable level.
I suspect ethnic cleansing won’t go away, rather the opposite. Forget aircraft, missiles, atomic weapons – you can bet your boots that genetics will become the weapon of the future.
The superpower scientists will design weapons which only target the foe they are fighting, leaving their own side unaffected. No buildings or infrastructure damage, just millions of dead enemy cadavers to dispose of.
Find a disease that mainly affects certain races, like sickle cell anaemia as a crude example, modify it, introduce it, and then simply walk into their empty territory and begin using their mineral deposits, space, etc.
Do you really think nations like the US, China and Russia (or whatever large nations exist in the future) will be beyond using ethnic cleansing on a huge scale once the chips are really down?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 31st January 2013 at 23:53

I’m not asking for anyone or anything to ‘change its spots’. Please re-read the comment…

Then I’ve misunderstood you; I thought you were suggesting that any nation that had been responsible for an atrocity should always be viewed as a nation that was accountable for an atrocity.

The only problem with not forgetting is that it is too easy to confuse with not forgiving. But we must not forget.

I do not really know why but I’ve never had the same view of the atrocities committed by Japan (or other nations) as of the Holocaust. It isn’t because of any personal or religious reasons. Maybe it is that culturally Britain was much closer to Germany than to Japan or maybe it was because Britain was (or had been) empire building in the Far East when it came into conflict with the Empire of Japan. I don’t know really, maybe it is because I know less about it (but I also have less interest).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 31st January 2013 at 19:32

Re 76

Kev 35

Believe me, I’m not at all under any misapprehension. I have very thoroughly re-read Oppama’s comments: 27, 34, 40, 53, 57,67, 79. Why am I left with a clear impression that he is on one side of this debate and I am on another?

I note that he does not deal with my specific points about recorded instances of Japanese atrocities including 731.

Whether or not one agrees with the separation of the modern German or Jap from the events in question one is left with the following:

It is my sincere belief – nothing to do with religion – that these two nations, due to the unparalled, unrestricted savagery of their national behaviour
during WW2, now trail an invisible cloud of guilt and shame across the firmament of their nation’s progress thru’ not only the past, but also the present and the future.

Such was the degree of their almost unimaginable barbarism, that invisible tainted cloud is with these two countries for all time. That is not to write – echoing your point that others have made also – that the passage of time won’t gradually diminish the impact of these horrors – it will, that is why our schools teach the story of the Nazi Holocaust and why they must continue so to do. Quite why they fail to mention the Japanese Holocaust is something I can’t explain.

Re 77
Creaking Door

I’m not asking for anyone or anything to ‘change its spots’. Please re-read the comment. It was made in response to a statement by Kev 35.

Yes, we must offer forgiveness. If we don’t offer it we can’t expect it. What we must not do at any time is to forget. And that is one of the purposes of this debate. It brings to the fore that which either natural forebearance or indolence gradually consigns to the past.

Britain’s role in ‘not very nice events?’ Of course. We have much in our huistory which makes me hang my head in shame. Amritsar and our treatment of Boer War civilians comes to mind, none of which involved me personally. It is as an Englishman that more than one hundred years after these events I feel guilt and shame. It isn’t something I want to discuss. I cannot believe that my civilised England was involved in these calamities.

And yet, it was as nothing compared with what we are writing about. Reprehensible yes, but a pinprick.

Re 79
Oppama

So, ‘Totally insane’ ? That satisfactorily explains the murderous medical experimentation of Unit 731 – does it? I think ‘totally inadequate’ is my riposte.

Believe me, they weren’t insane at Unit 731. They weren’t even slightly mad. They were engage in medical experimentation under the guise of scientific research on prisoners they referred to as ‘logs’. All experiments were carried out without anaesthetic so they could more accurately record the victims re-action.

Anyway I do not want to go on about it – it makes me feel sick. Please do not trouble yourself with a reply.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 31st January 2013 at 19:13

Any of the Scandinavian nations, Canada, New Zealand for starters…..?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,212

Send private message

By: paul178 - 31st January 2013 at 18:42

No race can be written off as vermin its just some seem to have more than others.No I do not mean the Jews in WW11
So which Country in the world is the most peace loving and tolerant today and mind their own business and getting on with improving the lot of its citizens?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 31st January 2013 at 16:41

Your last paragraph. Ask the opinion of any former captive of the Japanese during WW2 especially those who survived the tender ministrations of the Japanese medical teams working in Unit 731.

My uncle was one of them, and – even when I discussed the matter with him – never used that word. And certainly never in reference to modern Japan and the Japanese. But if he had, we could possibly have overlooked and excused it.

But I’m not asking them. I’m asking you, because you wrote it on this thread and on this forum.

Many who are tuned to this subject, would like to read your views, justifications, excuses etc. on the matter of Unit 731.

Justifications and excuses? What in God’s name are you on about?

If anyone still doubts my convictions ( thanks for your words, Kev ) then here they are again on the matter of Unit 731 as requested; I think the whole thing was totally insane. How could any sane person think otherwise?

Perhaps somebody who thinks that a whole nation or race of people can be “vermin”?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 31st January 2013 at 14:30

What has always impressed me is the ability of some of those that actually suffered some of these atrocities first-hand to reconcile, or even forgive, those that perpetrated the atrocity on them or their comrades, friends or family. If they can do this what right have I not to follow their example?

I agree with much of what you say as evidenced by my own posts but this comment, in particular, and I don’t think anyone else has reminded us of this fact.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 31st January 2013 at 14:06

“Can a leopard change its spots?” I think that most would agree not.

But who or what are you asking to ‘change its spots’; those individually responsible for carrying out an atrocity, those who ordered them to do so, those that were not born when the atrocities were carried out, ‘the Japanese’ back then or ‘the Japanese’ now?

Soon, so very soon, there will be nobody alive who actually lived through World War Two; there will be nobody left to remember first-hand, nobody to blame, nobody to apologise and so (in truth) nothing to apologise for.

I absolutely am not an ‘apologist’ for any atrocity but time must be allowed to heal these wounds, however deep they are, or how can we ever expect peace on the Earth? What has always impressed me is the ability of some of those that actually suffered some of these atrocities first-hand to reconcile, or even forgive, those that perpetrated the atrocity on them or their comrades, friends or family. If they can do this what right have I not to follow their example?

And if we are not to forgive, do we have some apologising of our own to do? What nation has Britain, or the British Empire, not fought? America, Russia, China, India, France, Holland, Spain, Ireland (Scotland and Wales), practically every country in Africa and the Middle East and has the British Empire never ‘meddled’ with Japan (pre-World War Two) against the wishes of its people? Although I like to think that Britain has a better record than many other nations I’m sure there are many things that we would not be proud of by today’s standards.

Has Britain ‘changed its spots’ since it acted as a colonial power and empire builder; or do we not need to?

(Edit: As usual, as I was taking ages to draft my post, Kev35 has posted something far more eloquent, in far fewer words! :o)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,395

Send private message

By: kev35 - 31st January 2013 at 13:34

John.

Oppama doesn’t need me to defend him and it’s plainly obvious that as he has said our views are more or less diametrically opposed. however, you appear to be labouring under a misapprehension regarding his views. I clearly understand that Oppama in no way denies the atrocities committed in the name of the Empire of Japan and he certainly does not excuse them. I think he is concerned more with our perception of the way things unfolded during the period of 1931 to 1945 and even later. He expresses concern about what he refers to as context.

To an extent, I agree with him. If we can absolve modern Germany of the crimes of the Nazi era, why then do we find it so hard to do the same with Japan? And that’s where we need to find the understanding. The Japanese people of today are not Japs any more than Germans are not Nazi’s, Huns or Boche. We cannot visit the sins of the Father upon the children. If we were to do so then certain periods of our history would come back to remind us of shameful periods in our past.

I want nothing more than to understand why and how the Japan and Japanese of the late 19th Century became the Japanese of the early and middle 20th Century. It’s a struggle.

Regards,

kev35

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 31st January 2013 at 13:27

John

In reality you are right, which is why I believe the adage to be misconceived.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 31st January 2013 at 13:21

Charlie,

I can’t imagine that it is possible. Put it another way. Can a leopard become a lamb? The answer to that has to be no. The intrinsic nature of a leopard is to be a leopard and to do what leopard’s do. Similarly a lamb.

If, somehow, a leopard could become a lamb then it ceases to be a leopard. Difficult for me to think that one thru’. Part of its reason to be is to eat lamb ! Chalk/Cheese.

Shades of Nietzche.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 31st January 2013 at 12:48

John

I have often wondered about that because in my relatively limited experience but over many years I have known quite a few “leopards” who have without question “changed their spots”. I don’t think I go along with the adage.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 31st January 2013 at 12:34

Kev 35

Your last but one paragraph. Can a “leopard change its spots?” I think that most would agree not.

Please pass to your father my wishes and hope for a full recovery.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 31st January 2013 at 12:07

Re 67

Oppama

Your last paragraph. Ask the opinion of any former captive of the Japanese during WW2 especially those who survived the tender ministrations of the Japanese medical teams working in Unit 731.

Many who are tuned to this subject, would like to read your views, justifications, excuses etc. on the matter of Unit 731.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,395

Send private message

By: kev35 - 31st January 2013 at 00:00

Sorry to hear about your Dad, and I hope he makes a swift and full recovery.

However, we went through all this before didn’t we? You only seem to have remembered me as some kind of apologist with views diametrically-opposed to your own. And, as I tried to point out before, it’s not as simple as that….

You repeat this ( translated? ) quote that many of those imprisoned were subsequently released “without stain…”, when in fact almost all the released were released on parole. How can somebody be released on parole and – at the same time – be “without stain on their character”? Doesn’t quite add up does it? Look into it a little more closely and you see that things are not quite as clear as they are painted. Do you know why they were paroled?

So many of the things that were done in post-war Japan were done because they were seen as the best way to start clearing up a huge mess, because they were seen as being expedient at the time, because they were economically, politically and strategically useful to one prosecuting side or another. Isolating certain situations ( as you did with Yasukuni before ) and trying to tackle them out of context is not really going to get anywhere. There’s no end to it.

But what’s perhaps more disturbing is the occasional glimpse on this forum, and from some of the people involved in this thread, of the kind of thinking that leads to the very same things happening all over again. If people are actually willing to believe that there’s such a thing as ‘Untermensch’ ( some of the Japanese imperialists called them ‘Chankoro’ – look it up ) then they are tilling the soil for the seeds of another bout of genocide to be sown. I’ve seen long-term forum members with many hundreds of posts to their name call the Japanese “filth”, and one within the last week write about “slitty eyed people” without a word of admonishment from other members, until a moderator deleted the whole post ( thank you ).

So the seeds are out there alright. Truth be told, they are living in all of us…

Firstly, let me apologise for quoting the whole of Oppama’s post but after a hard few days at the hospital and a really hard day coming up tomorrow, it’s the only way I’m going to be able to produce anything like a coherent response.

Oppama, I do fully realise that things are not as simple as you think I think they are and I have you to thank, at least in part, for the simple fact that I have come to this realisation. I’ve read the best part of 100 books on this subject, from both sides, and I’ve read the judgement of the IMTFE and the papers from the three Webb inquiries. So at least credit me with trying to come to some level of understanding.

I haven’t the time to find the source of my ‘without stain….’ comment but I am positive it is something I have read and, yes, I guess it has to be a translation from the Japanese language.

I know why the Emperor and the Imperial family were exonerated and I know why some of those convicted of war crimes were paroled. I also understand why, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, some of those accused never even faced a trial. And yes, I lay much of the blame for this at the door of Macarthur and America’s desire to reintegrate Japan into a society which was an ally of the West.

I do not have the ability to look in depth at ‘both sides’ as you have, I do not have the facility but I do try. Whilst bitterness and hatred may well be negative and even destructive emotions, I can understand why such bitterness exists. It is still, just, within living memory. Personally I can never forget the atrocities committed in the name of the Empire of Japan, neither can I forgive those responsible, at the time, for those atrocities. More specifically I can never forgive those who made one of the kindest and gentlest of men recoil in horror when he was approached by a well dressed, respectful and polite Japanese car salesman at the Motor Show and this was fifty years after my Uncle had spent nine months trekking through the jungles of Burma.

I’m too tired to write more tonight and I’m sorry that my comments have, in part, derailed this thread. For me, it’s taken a detour down an interesting avenue and again I’d like to thank Oppama for making me re-examine my views and for encouraging me to develop a deeper understanding of this subject.

To John, I understand the reasons for your hatred of the Japanese of that period and to an extent I share that. But the Japanese of today are a very different people.

I’ll try, Oppama (what is your name?), when I have the time, to find the sources for the comments I have made, I know I got them from somewhere but for mow I’m sure you understand that Dad has to be my priority. Speaking of Dad, he has shown some slight improvement but it is very early days, he is very old and he is not yet out out of the woods.

Kind regards,

kev35

1 4 5
Sign in to post a reply