September 10, 2006 at 3:55 pm
enjoy also quick thing to say pakistan was on way for take off and 2 flights had 2 abort beacause he had problems and retired to the terminal.
im sorry the stupid fences are in the way on some and sun light













By: lukeylad - 11th September 2006 at 18:19
Thing with european tristars is that they aint that nice inside very dated very 80s looking when the tristar was in its hayday, Then again all they do now is charters so comfort aint bigger an issue now Thai for example have tristars with refitted insides which are loverly.
Just done some research theres been quite a bit of tristar action at MAN this last month.
By: A330-200 - 11th September 2006 at 18:15
ok
why wasnt the pax hapy?
yes it was 767.
By: lukeylad - 11th September 2006 at 17:28
Looks like a 767 to me.
Wait a minute sorry mate getting my dates mixed up a Luz air tristar was in on the 9th covering a varna flight.
Apologies.
By: philgatwick05 - 11th September 2006 at 17:20
The Euro atlantic tristar was covering a thomsons flight from varna and from what i hear it was a very unpleasant flight for the passengers!!
Looks like a 767 to me.
By: lukeylad - 11th September 2006 at 17:15
The Euro atlantic tristar was covering a thomsons flight from varna and from what i hear it was a very unpleasant flight for the passengers!!
By: A330-200 - 11th September 2006 at 15:46
thanks leeman and philgatwick
i ment to say
what was euroatlantic doing and operating on what route?
By: PMN - 10th September 2006 at 22:53
Maybe I am a tad patronising at times however I don’t see anything inside my above post as patronising, but hell we’re not all perfect are we.
I don’t really understand your point much because you are presuming that I have not done anything you have suggested and you are suggesting I do so, when infact I have done copious amount of times, but I don’t see why I should explain myself in the public domain on moderator issues.
What I suggest is that this thread get’s back on topic and any further correspondence about this should be made via PMDean
PM on its way.
By: Deano - 10th September 2006 at 22:51
Maybe I am a tad patronising at times however I don’t see anything inside my above post as patronising, but hell we’re not all perfect are we.
I don’t really understand your point much because you are presuming that I have not done anything you have suggested and you are suggesting I do so, when infact I have done copious amount of times, but I don’t see why I should explain myself in the public domain on moderator issues.
What I suggest is that this thread get’s back on topic and any further correspondence about this should be made via PM
Dean
By: PMN - 10th September 2006 at 22:43
And also rather presumptuous, Paul, whilst you have the best interests at heart do you think we just sit here for the sake of it? as Lance has said of course I have done these things, but we’re hardly going to release things like that into the public domain are we, 🙂 you can draw a horse to it’s water, but you can’t make him drink it
No of course I don’t. Not for a moment, and please don’t think I’m not aware of how much time you Mods put into keeping this site on track. Believe me, I appreciate that effort, but I do find your tone at times somewhat patronising, and your reply quoted above is a perfect example of this.
I fully understand and accept your point. All I ask is that you understand mine.
Paul
By: Deano - 10th September 2006 at 22:25
Please don’t think for a second I’m in anything but total agreement, but surely as a moderator you should be addressing the issue by sending a PM to A330-200 outlining the problems with his posting instead of making comments such as these? Just an observation.
Paul
And also rather presumptuous, Paul, whilst you have the best interests at heart do you think we just sit here for the sake of it? as Lance has said of course I have done these things, but we’re hardly going to release things like that into the public domain are we, 🙂 you can draw a horse to it’s water, but you can’t make him drink it
By: LeeMan8 - 10th September 2006 at 22:24
EuroAtlantic CS-TLQ was operating for Flyjet AFAIK
By: philgatwick05 - 10th September 2006 at 22:12
A330-200.
I’m no expert on photos in anyway – but with past experience from myself and others I personally think you’d be better just showing us the ones that came out well, and some did, like the Emirates, China AIrlines Cargo and the PIA.
It’s just that they’re a bit let down by the other out of focus/noisy ones.
Just my 2 cents…is this a fair comment?
By: PMN - 10th September 2006 at 22:11
Paul, please don’t think we mods haven’t tried your suggestion.
God knows, we’ve tried and tried and tried and tried………….. :rolleyes:
OK Lance… Fair enough! 🙂
Paul
By: Grey Area - 10th September 2006 at 22:04
Paul, please don’t think we mods haven’t tried your suggestion.
God knows, we’ve tried and tried and tried and tried………….. :rolleyes:
By: PMN - 10th September 2006 at 22:01
Pardon? nobody understands a word you are saying :rolleyes:
Please don’t think for a second I’m in anything but total agreement, but surely as a moderator you should be addressing the issue by sending a PM to A330-200 outlining the problems with his posting instead of making comments such as these? Just an observation.
Paul
By: Deano - 10th September 2006 at 21:55
also wat what euro atlantic doing there
Pardon? nobody understands a word you are saying :rolleyes:
By: A330-200 - 10th September 2006 at 19:18
also wat what euro atlantic doing there