February 5, 2004 at 8:38 am
The aircraft [PP-VPK], on its second landing attempt in heavy rain and high winds, overran the runway and stopped around 160m from the runway threshold while landing at Natal.
By: greekdude1 - 8th February 2004 at 09:31
If you don’t have anit-lock brakes, you pump the brake petal. That’s how we are taught in the states.
By: andrewm - 7th February 2004 at 13:04
Originally posted by Bmused55
That exactly what you SHOULDN’T do. You just lift of the excelerator and make gentle steering commands with the wheel.As for an Aircraft I’d imagine its not that easy.
I didnt mean brake i meant foot off the brake.
By: Moondance - 7th February 2004 at 12:46
Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
Nooo!! I hope Varig wants to repair it with their little money.
These accidents mean that the pilot made a mistake.
-Failure to get all wheels down before the end of the touchdown stripes
-Too low Autobrake setting
Can we blame the pilots?
So much speculation, so few facts.
By: Bmused55 - 7th February 2004 at 09:49
Originally posted by andrewm
In a car it is easy to stop aquaplaning as you take ur foot off the gas and brake but how do you stop the accelation EASILY like a car in a MD11 jet? Reverse thrust yes but wont reduce speed as quickly as a car.Was it a visual landing as then he might not have touched down on the threshold at the other end due to weather like full ILS CATIII would then he has less space before end of runway as well.
That exactly what you SHOULDN’T do. You just lift of the excelerator and make gentle steering commands with the wheel.
As for an Aircraft I’d imagine its not that easy.
By: atc pal - 7th February 2004 at 06:19
We can always blame the pilot(s). 😉
After all it wouldn’t have happened if he (they) had stayed in bed.
“Human factors”? A little early to pin that.
Best regards
atc pal
By: andrewm - 6th February 2004 at 22:39
In a car it is easy to stop aquaplaning as you take ur foot off the gas and brake but how do you stop the accelation EASILY like a car in a MD11 jet? Reverse thrust yes but wont reduce speed as quickly as a car.
Was it a visual landing as then he might not have touched down on the threshold at the other end due to weather like full ILS CATIII would then he has less space before end of runway as well.
By: paul the wall - 6th February 2004 at 21:49
That was a bit of a close one, does anybody know does ( The no blame policy) come in here to protect the pilot.
By: Bmused55 - 6th February 2004 at 21:49
Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
Nooo!! I hope Varig wants to repair it with their little money.
These accidents mean that the pilot made a mistake.
-Failure to get all wheels down before the end of the touchdown stripes
-Too low Autobrake setting
Can we blame the pilots?
Lets not get too hasty now. It had just rained. Aquaplaning may be at fault here
By: Jeanske_SN - 6th February 2004 at 19:47
Nooo!! I hope Varig wants to repair it with their little money.
These accidents mean that the pilot made a mistake.
-Failure to get all wheels down before the end of the touchdown stripes
-Too low Autobrake setting
Can we blame the pilots?
By: brenmcc1 - 6th February 2004 at 09:40
lol
By: Britannia - 5th February 2004 at 18:24
I get it now, thanks:rolleyes:
By: brenmcc1 - 5th February 2004 at 18:17
104 onboard and none died
By: Britannia - 5th February 2004 at 17:27
silly question but how can you have 0:104 Fatalities
By: greekdude1 - 5th February 2004 at 17:11
Looks like it undershot the runway. Is that dirt or concrete in front of the aircraft?
By: Bmused55 - 5th February 2004 at 09:40
Well its still standing, that would indicate damage was minimal.
Prolly spend a week in a hangar getting the gear checked then off it goes again
By: steve rowell - 5th February 2004 at 08:49
***
By: steve rowell - 5th February 2004 at 08:48
Date: 28 January 2004
Airline: Varig
Flight No.: 7
Aircraft: McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Location: Natal, Brazil
Fatalities: 0:104