dark light

MIG 17 any news

Hi

Has anyone got any idea how things are going with the MIG 17 rebuild to fly t Bournemouth ?

Will it be ready for 2004 and are the Caa ok with it all ?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

676

Send private message

By: mjr - 11th October 2005 at 17:35

I think having an afterburner fitted moves the aircraft into the ‘complex’ type category, and therefore needs manufacturers type back-up and support.

Kind of, but not quite as simple as that unfortunately. The Bucc and the Vixen both come under the complex classification, the bucc being especially complex, yet both are able to fly (or will be) .

Unfortunately the word Re-heat or after burn seem to be surrounded in a silly veil of fear and miss information within CAA corridors, not always justified, the Lightning being a case in point. UK attrition rates were high, however foreign rates were excellent, due to different operational circumstances and economics, yet its UK attrition record, played a big part in it not flying in the UK. Only part of the picture taken into account.

MJR

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 9th October 2005 at 13:18

Is it that or more to do with the CAA not being very fussy about sonic booms over the countryside?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

550

Send private message

By: Ewan Hoozarmy - 9th October 2005 at 13:09

I think having an afterburner fitted moves the aircraft into the ‘complex’ type category, and therefore needs manufacturers type back-up and support.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 9th October 2005 at 06:53

Is there something specificly problematic about an afterburner, or is that just a complexity benchmark?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

550

Send private message

By: Ewan Hoozarmy - 9th October 2005 at 00:20

I’m led to believe that it will fly eventually, and the question about the afterburner rests on the fact that although it has one, its use is not required to enable the aircraft to take off ‘normally’.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,162

Send private message

By: Manonthefence - 8th October 2005 at 12:28

Hmmmm

an afterburning aircraft (not manufacturer owned) on the British Register and cleared by the CAA!

Hmmmmmm

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,614

Send private message

By: Black Knight - 8th October 2005 at 12:03

I always thought it was sold after Marks death as OFMC seemed to thin down the ops to just what was needed for the Breitling Fighters. I spoke to Dan Griffiths at the last Coventry airshow & he told me it was still planned to fly as he was going to be the test pilot & it was only a year or so away.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,462

Send private message

By: ALBERT ROSS - 7th October 2005 at 23:04

This is actually an ex-Polish Lim-5, G-BWUF, that the OFMC had at Duxford for a few years painted up in North Vietnam colours. They were going to fly it and I believe the only thing stopping them was the CAA paperwork, as there has never been a MiG-17 on the British Civil register. I believe they gave up trying and sold it to the Bournemouth Museum. Whether they overcome this remains to be seen.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,150

Send private message

By: stringbag - 7th October 2005 at 21:43

It was on display within the museum hangar at Bournemouth.
Nothing on the surface seems to have changed recently.
I’ll see what I can find out…

Sign in to post a reply