February 23, 2009 at 2:16 pm
Just Found this topic on one of the aviation forums-
“Are there really ghost planes or is it something much simpler??
i have not edited it in any way..”
I seriously doubt it but when I tried it in google earth its still there.:confused:
Maybe you wanna have a look there
http://www.airvids.net/view/292/ghost-aicraft-spotted-by-satellite/
By: Ren Frew - 25th February 2009 at 00:23
Oh please!!!…i bet that’s gone over a few heads!!!
At 50,000 feet too…
By: steve rowell - 24th February 2009 at 23:09
Now, that’s the Spirit….. :diablo:
Oh please!!!…i bet that’s gone over a few heads!!!
By: Ren Frew - 24th February 2009 at 19:29
Maybe it’s a Phantom?
Or a Voodoo ?
By: Ren Frew - 24th February 2009 at 19:28
I think it says “If you can read this you are too gulllible…” Did you know there are three “L’s” in gulllible by the way ?
Er………. four
Now that’s pedanticism…:)
By: Grey Area - 24th February 2009 at 19:23
Or a B2 ?
Now, that’s the Spirit….. :diablo:
By: tenthije - 24th February 2009 at 19:20
I think it says “If you can read this you are too gulllible…” Did you know there are three “L’s” in gulllible by the way ?
Er………. four
Now who’s being gullible, don’t believe everything your read!
By: 25deg south - 24th February 2009 at 18:44
I think it says “If you can read this you are too gulllible…” Did you know there are three “L’s” in gulllible by the way ?
Er………. four
By: Ren Frew - 24th February 2009 at 18:20
Maybe it’s a Phantom?
Or a B2 ?
By: Grey Area - 24th February 2009 at 18:07
Maybe it’s a Phantom?
By: Ren Frew - 24th February 2009 at 15:13
How long have you been thinking this reply up?! 😀
Ooh… it must have all of 30 seconds…:D
By: rdc1000 - 24th February 2009 at 12:15
I think it says “If you can read this you are too gulllible…” Did you know there are three “L’s” in gulllible by the way ? 😀
But to address the ‘salient’ point, yes those must be ghost planes, I’m sure I read about them in Witch Magazine once, BA and other LHR operators fly them around empty all the time to keep their landing slots secure during quiet “spells”. Apparently ‘Spirit’ Airlines do the same…;)
Now then, who would like to look on Goulie Earth for the half airliner landing at Schipol near the Poltergeist…sorry Polderbaan.:diablo:
How long have you been thinking this reply up?! 😀
By: Ren Frew - 24th February 2009 at 10:40
If anyone cares enough, the “clue” mentioned at the end of the video is text that appears in faint white writing when the image of the planes is shown. I found it impossible to read, but somebody else might be able to.
I think it says “If you can read this you are too gulllible…” Did you know there are three “L’s” in gulllible by the way ? 😀
But to address the ‘salient’ point, yes those must be ghost planes, I’m sure I read about them in Witch Magazine once, BA and other LHR operators fly them around empty all the time to keep their landing slots secure during quiet “spells”. Apparently ‘Spirit’ Airlines do the same…;)
Now then, who would like to look on Goulie Earth for the half airliner landing at Schipol near the Poltergeist…sorry Polderbaan.:diablo:
By: Easty - 24th February 2009 at 08:52
I unfortunately cant see the said ghost plane at LHR, but have this image at my local, Southampton airport
By: Arabella-Cox - 24th February 2009 at 00:30
If anyone cares enough, the “clue” mentioned at the end of the video is text that appears in faint white writing when the image of the planes is shown. I found it impossible to read, but somebody else might be able to.
By: steve rowell - 24th February 2009 at 00:10
I cannot believe so much thought from so many has gone into this?!? :rolleyes:
I was thinking the same thing but kept my mouth shut!!!
By: HuwJHopkins - 23rd February 2009 at 22:51
I did a bit of checking and found out that the LHR image was taken on 29/01/06, then checked historical weather conditions and the temperature overnight was 0C with no precipitation on that day or the previous day.
Going by the length of the shadows, it looks like a very early morning shot, so I think it is de-icer fluid.FYI, the image was taken by Bluesky
Yes, I am sure there are better things I could be doing! 😀
Either de-icer or condensation that had run off the aircraft?
Cheers, Huw:)
By: Arabella-Cox - 23rd February 2009 at 22:47
I think the water theory explains the two on the outside and the one in the middle to a certain extent. But the one in the middle certainly has something else going on too. Twas why I suggested the multiple exosure thing.
By: Yippekaya - 23rd February 2009 at 22:26
I did a bit of checking and found out that the LHR image was taken on 29/01/06, then checked historical weather conditions and the temperature overnight was 0C with no precipitation on that day or the previous day.
Going by the length of the shadows, it looks like a very early morning shot, so I think it is de-icer fluid.
FYI, the image was taken by Bluesky
Yes, I am sure there are better things I could be doing! 😀
By: Super Nimrod - 23rd February 2009 at 22:16
DavidS is correct. Go and sit in a car park after a shower on a warm day and you will see this a lot. You often see the reverse as well, when the ground under the vehicle is dry when it pulls off and all around it is wet. It really is very common
By: steve rowell - 23rd February 2009 at 22:15
They look like 747’s covered in hair…Air France maybe???