dark light

New 262 and old 262's, spot the diff!

I could not find quiet the same angle’s, but these are close enough.

Well, what do all you other 262 fan’s, outthere think!.

Dolf’s at it again! :rolleyes:

(From Axl’s)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 4th November 2005 at 05:39

Hee He Hee He, trying to take off Muttly!!!

DID SOME ONE JUSY SAY 262

WITH A VERY LONG CANNON!!!!

any excuse for ME will do!

Now I shall Buggger Off!!

CYA!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 13th September 2005 at 06:17

I’d like to see that ZR!!

Perhap’s if they build say a dozen more :rolleyes: ,

The 262’s could have their own race class :p

๐Ÿ˜ฎ Just imagine a swarm of new 262’s comming past the stand’s on the deck!!! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
:dev2:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 12th September 2005 at 18:42

Take the single seater to Reno…. ๐Ÿ˜‰
:diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo:
:diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 12th September 2005 at 18:17

Thank’s Pat!.

I must agree Too!.

You are in a good pozzy mate!!!

I only WISH!!!!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

25

Send private message

By: Pat Murphy - 2nd September 2005 at 06:26

Spot the 262 difference

It may be difficult to spot any difference by viewing the pictures that have been posted with this thread, having been to the Everett production plant several times over the past few years and, having seen one original 262 I can tell you that the big difference is the quality of the the build. The new Everett 262’s are exceptional, fantastic workmanship and the hospitality of the tour guides is second to none. To see these incredible aircraft is a pleasure. I for one, wish only the best of luck to the lucky owners of these fine historic aircraft. I hope to see one in the air soon and look forward to seeing the 109’s that are being considered for rebuilds. The warbird community is fortunate to have people like the Everett based builders to contribute so much to our hobby. Im very fortunate that living just a short drive away in Canada that I have had the opportunity to witness the progress that has been made with these Stormbirds.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

137

Send private message

By: Prowlus - 2nd September 2005 at 02:37

She was a “Pulk-Zerstรถrer”, fly to the Allies-Bomber-Formation an hold in.
(Sorry for my bad english)

Thats the ME-262A1/U4. A bomber busting plane with a big cannon . A better name for it would be “Herget’s Telephone Pole” after Wilhelm Herget the pilot of a U4 who “borrowed” one to go join Galland’s JV-44

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 1st September 2005 at 03:23

No problem Two six two mate!.

Great Link, thank’s.

I already had that one, BUT had forgotten about it, and did not check for 262 stuff!.

So Paul Allen’s(Micro man) got Howie’s old racing 262, and they are talking an Original rebuild, with Jumo’s and all, heard it before,
BUT I think it’s going to be a good one to watch,….if they can do it!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 1st September 2005 at 02:50

Sound’s mouth watering to me Gordon, Can not Wait Mate!

Thank You!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

35

Send private message

By: gordonpagecolor - 1st September 2005 at 02:15

Bottom line is that we now have some FLYING examples… Should have some video up on our www.warbirdrecovery.com site soon. Wow!

Cheers!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

273

Send private message

By: planejunky - 1st September 2005 at 00:58

Dunno about the canopies, the biggest give away for me is the PC induced lack of swazis! ๐Ÿ˜€ :rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

51

Send private message

By: TwoSixTwo - 31st August 2005 at 17:36

๐Ÿ™‚
Sorry,but eventually you can have more Infos at here:
http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/specs/messersc/262a1au1.htm

My Infos only from Magazines, and i not sure where i have left ๐Ÿ˜‰
It is long long time ago.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 31st August 2005 at 16:39

Actung!

No worry’s mate! ๐Ÿ˜‰ ,

Thank’s Two six two ๐Ÿ˜‰ , me Mum come’s from Pfeffer stock! :rolleyes:

I am a real Kiwi/Pom/German/Aussie Bast*rd Mongrel :p .

Do ya know how much testing they did with the BIG gun mate! :confused:

(p.s only German I know, Learnt of Hogan’s Heroe’s ๐Ÿ˜€ )

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

51

Send private message

By: TwoSixTwo - 31st August 2005 at 15:36

She was a “Pulk-Zerstรถrer”, fly to the Allies-Bomber-Formation an hold in.
(Sorry for my bad english)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 31st August 2005 at 14:33

I still wonder about that BIG gun job!

First time, I THINK I have seen it!, not so sure memory not so good now!.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 31st August 2005 at 14:29

Could be, but she sure is NICE!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

99

Send private message

By: Macfire - 30th August 2005 at 11:33

I find that the canopy is higher than on the original.

Me too.

Plus the nose wheel plumbing and doors.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,360

Send private message

By: Bager1968 - 30th August 2005 at 07:54

The Tango-Tango cockpit has a straight line down the back from the top-center, while the original has a slight outward curve down the back!

My first impression, even before I saw the mention of it was that they had used a modified canopy from a P-63 King Cobra, or similar.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 29th August 2005 at 14:43

more :rolleyes:

I wonder what the BUGGGER with the BIG gun flew like! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,904

Send private message

By: STORMBIRD262 - 29th August 2005 at 14:26

H’mmm

Well, I have been looking at 262’s ๐Ÿ˜ฎ , for a few day’s now :rolleyes: .

Yes,
It may look a bit more blown, but even some war shot’s of 262’s look different sometime’s at another angle, I think, some were a little different among them.

Avia’s yes they are lower.

Hughe’s 262 was lower too I think.

Stub’s and Cone’s, well it doe’s look like she has them too :confused: .

Been looking at White 35 Original next to White One ๐Ÿ™‚ .

They are very good copy’s I think, not very much between them and the original’s.

Except, These are like the next, new and improved model’s, just off the line! ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 29th August 2005 at 10:29

Personally i reckon the replicas look better than the old ones with the canopy, and they still look close enough to the real thing for me to spend my few million on (if i had it!)

Let’s go halfers on one, old boy!! ๐Ÿ˜€

1 2
Sign in to post a reply