December 15, 2006 at 3:22 pm
what are the odds of Duxford getting an F117 when the type is retired?
By: SADSACK - 19th December 2006 at 17:13
re:
“relevance?” same could be said of the huge numberso f F100s Tbirds and Mysteres in collections.
Its a mean looking aeroplane that would look amazing on the gate and attract punters. What more reason do you need?
By: J Boyle - 16th December 2006 at 19:05
As the first operation aircraft designed around being “stealthy” (if that’s a proper word) as the principal objective, I’d think there would be an interest in if from that perspective.
Much as the Me-262 is displayed as the first combat jet…irrespective of nationality.
By: michelf - 16th December 2006 at 18:57
The IWM’s remit in collecting terms is pretty wide…which means that anything operated, owned, captured or liberated by UK forces is fair game.
The American Air Museum is a way of getting a wider net of UK based American hardware into the equation.
It is not simply a Museum of Warfare….their remit does have limits…
B-52s may not have dropped weapons in anger in Europe, but they were and are regular visitors to these shores.. moreso than the F-117, even if they were delpoyed during operations in Kosovo.
That the IWM would like to have one is not the issue.. I’m sure they would, but how it is intergrated into the collection would be interesting…
Mind it would be pretty special to have a U-2, SR and F-117 in the same building.. spanning the best of the Kelly/ Rich Skunk Works era.
By: David Burke - 16th December 2006 at 18:41
DGH – they could put some rides down that end as well which could bring a few more punters in!
By: David Burke - 16th December 2006 at 18:39
The B-52 in the collection did not drop any bombs in anger in Europe before it was retired from service. There are examples of the F-117 that have.
By: DGH - 16th December 2006 at 18:36
I don’t know what their collecting policy is but IWM is a Museum of Warfare therefore almost any military machine would surely be relevant.
Roger Smith.
Well it’s the Imperial War Museum, which refers to the British empire – so that should narrow it down abit.
By: DGH - 16th December 2006 at 18:34
Relevant or not I’m sure it would mean plenty of ‘bucks’ through the door which would benefit the collection as a whole. Part of the whole balancing act of keeping a museum within it’s remit and bringing in the punters.
By: RPSmith - 16th December 2006 at 18:22
However the relevance of the F-117 is not clear…
I don’t know what their collecting policy is but IWM is a Museum of Warfare therefore almost any military machine would surely be relevant.
Roger Smith.
By: michelf - 16th December 2006 at 17:46
Curly,
They, the IWM, did not want to locate the F-15 inside…a choice motivated by desire not space inside the AAM.
If an F-117 was loaned to the IWM under the same conditions as the Sr then space in the AAM would be found…
However the relevance of the F-117 is not clear…
By: Arabella-Cox - 15th December 2006 at 21:08
We have a SR71 that is all the tribute the skunk works need.
The F117 would have no where to go as they cant even get the F15A inside and that has been here a few years now.
But i do agree what has the F117 got to do with the UK ?, at least the SR71 visited the UK and had a DET here for quite a while.
No if you want to see a nighthawk go to the states as i will not be busting to see one at Dux.
curlyboy
By: Heard not seen - 15th December 2006 at 20:18
Get the trident and VC-10 indoors first 😀 Then a F-117 as another fine tribute to the Skunk Works, and to the late Ben Rich?
I once heard that south Cambridgeshire Highways planning department were also once based at Groom, manned by aliens with a crazy ideas to destroy the whole world with service stations and slightly more pricey KFC!!
By: 92fis - 15th December 2006 at 18:09
When I was at Wittering circa mid 1990’s there was one doing a series of touch and goes – where was that operating from?
Lakenheath.
By: David Burke - 15th December 2006 at 18:06
When I was at Wittering circa mid 1990’s there was one doing a series of touch and goes – where was that operating from?
By: J Boyle - 15th December 2006 at 17:50
And what exactly is the relevance of the F-117 to UK aviation history?
I’m sure that it would make an interesting exhibit, but in my opinion, there are still British aircraft outside at Duxford that need to come in out of the rain, before bringing in even more American types.
I’m guessing SADSACK meant at the American Air Museum…
Unlike many of the AC there, it did not operate from the UK…neither did the Huey, Stearman, Navy F-4s…
BTW: I know that the type did visit USAF bases in the UK prior to its official announcement in 1988 or 89.
By: David Burke - 15th December 2006 at 17:45
I guess in the AAM it would be fairly relevant – possibly more than a fibreglass
Mustang !
By: Discendo Duces - 15th December 2006 at 17:15
And what exactly is the relevance of the F-117 to UK aviation history?
I’m sure that it would make an interesting exhibit, but in my opinion, there are still British aircraft outside at Duxford that need to come in out of the rain, before bringing in even more American types.
By: J Boyle - 15th December 2006 at 16:16
what are the odds of Duxford getting an F117 when the type is retired?
Probably pretty good…though they might want/have to replace some of the sections with RAM as they did with the example at Wright-Patterson.
By: bexWH773 - 15th December 2006 at 15:56
Me be serious? Never LoL Now david, you didnt mention if said Guard was twiddling his thumbs or not??? :diablo:
By: Andy in Beds - 15th December 2006 at 15:56
My interest was temporarily aroused by a thread I thought might be about the Nieuport Nighthawk.
By: David Burke - 15th December 2006 at 15:51
Now Bex do be serious! – he is stood next to the Aurora – the Nighthawk is soo 80’s !