dark light

  • snafu

No single adults allowed

A warning for some on this forum.

Single adults banned from park – in case they are a paedophile

A bird enthusiast made a 25-mile trip to see a falconry display at a family leisure park only to be told that single adults are banned – for fear of paedophiles.

Married man Matthew Richards, 54, a father of three grown-up children, was staggered by the rule at award-winning Puxton Park, a family-orientated leisure attraction near Weston-super-Mare.

Mr Richards, who also has three grandchildren, had previously visited the park with his family to admire the birds of prey.

But when he returned on Thursday hoping to watch another falconry display he was told he couldn’t be admitted as a single man, on child protection grounds.

Puxton Park claimed the rule, which is explained in the small print on its website, was “in line with all other parks”.

http://www.westerngazette.co.uk/Single-adults-banned-park-case-paedophile/story-24477493-detail/story.html

Now imagine that this rule was in place at aeroplane museums…;o)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,892

Send private message

By: mike currill - 21st November 2014 at 11:54

Possibly more so.

See the fuss about some nurse who returned to the States feeling perfectly fine from an Ebola region and refused to stay locked indoors for three weeks.

(If this is not totally accurate bear with me, I really wasn’t that interested.)

Moggy

That actually presented a very interesting situation. The gestation period for the Ebola virus is twenty one days, therefore the authorities were right to get anti with her for being out in public about a week after she returned from an Ebola infected area. On the other hand I can understand her wanting to get out in the fresh air. Though why she couldn’t have kept to her own garden I don’t know.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,892

Send private message

By: mike currill - 21st November 2014 at 11:48

But he was there for a Falconary display, nothing else, not to hang around the swings etc… as for Photography, what difference is there in photographing in a town or in the park, all by the way perfectly legal…. lets face it, the lenses I/we use for taking aircraft photos could just as easily take pictures of anyone without their knowledge, not that I/we would.
Its just another sad indictment to how OTT the UK has become, true it’s an evil business, but don’t tar everyone with the same brush. Remember all the security checks and background in the world will prove squat, as until arrested they would have all past it with flying colours. what next? two teachers to a classroom?

Makes a mockery of the ‘innocent until proven guilty’ thing doesn’t it? The onus of proof is on the accuser not the accused.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 13th November 2014 at 05:50

Sticking to this specific topic you confirm what I believed to be the case. In fact I doubt that any other nation shares the paranoia that there are paedophiles on every street corner as the British media and a large percentage of the population clearly does.

I’ll watch the space but hope you don’t follow suit!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 13th November 2014 at 00:29

Are Americans as paranoic as the British?

Not about this topic. (Not yet anyway…watch this space).
Americans do have their fears…some legitimate, others less so.

But then again when it comes to international terrorism, they do have a large target on their backs.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 12th November 2014 at 10:26

Re 34

Yes, but also possibly a returning jihadist, infected with Ebola…………….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 12th November 2014 at 09:46

But he was there for a Falconary display, nothing else, not to hang around the swings etc…

No, I appreciate that. It is the park that is at fault here. They seriously need to review their admissions policy; they would never get away with refusing access to anybody based on race, religion or sexuality…

…I doubt it is legal to refuse admission based on gender. And not realistic to ‘judge’ on ‘pedophile’ potential!!! :rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 11th November 2014 at 21:56

They thought she was a paedophile………??

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 11th November 2014 at 21:35

Possibly more so.

See the fuss about some nurse who returned to the States feeling perfectly fine from an Ebola region and refused to stay locked indoors for three weeks.

(If this is not totally accurate bear with me, I really wasn’t that interested.)

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 11th November 2014 at 20:39

Are Americans as paranoic as the British?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 11th November 2014 at 20:32

American comic/TV host/car collector Jay Leno recently said when he was a teenager a neighbor had a Jaguar XK120. The man noticed Leno was enthralled with the car and one day gave him a ride.
Leno said that was an earlier time, before a time “when every man was automatically considered a pedophile”. The ride turned him into the collector and expert he is today.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 11th November 2014 at 12:22

the Media and the Establishment make it appear as if the barrel is full of rotten apples and in this case as if by magic marriage cures the problem, it doesn’t and never will.

Which simply proves the utter illogicality and stupidity of the approach to the problem. In any case I believe I am right in sating that the majority of child abuse is carried out by family members on their own kin.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,042

Send private message

By: TonyT - 11th November 2014 at 12:12

Yup, Do not get me wrong, Child safety is paramount and those children effected do not deserve the treatment they have received in robbing them of their innocence and childhood. Castration and prison would be my punishment, then (if and when they have served their sentence) they will no longer pose a threat. But like apples, it simply takes one rotten one in the barrel to taint the rest, and unfortunately the Media and the Establishment make it appear as if the barrel is full of rotten apples and in this case as if by magic marriage cures the problem, it doesn’t and never will.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 11th November 2014 at 11:18

The real problem is that the default position is that everyone of us is a potential paedophile rather than none of us is but a very few might be. It has become a media and establishment driven paranoia and to my mind is extremely unhealthy.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,042

Send private message

By: TonyT - 11th November 2014 at 10:33

But he was there for a Falconary display, nothing else, not to hang around the swings etc… as for Photography, what difference is there in photographing in a town or in the park, all by the way perfectly legal…. lets face it, the lenses I/we use for taking aircraft photos could just as easily take pictures of anyone without their knowledge, not that I/we would.
Its just another sad indictment to how OTT the UK has become, true it’s an evil business, but don’t tar everyone with the same brush. Remember all the security checks and background in the world will prove squat, as until arrested they would have all past it with flying colours. what next? two teachers to a classroom?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 10th November 2014 at 23:51

Link to the BBC website article:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-29985181

I suppose it does put a slightly different slant on the story if indeed ‘90% of the park is child related play equipment unsuitable for adults’ however I’ve never really understood the paranoia regarding adults ‘armed with a camera’; surely any potential ‘pedophile’ could find much easier, and less suspicious, ways of obtaining the sort of images of children they’d get at a play park, than by taking a camera into a play park?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,556

Send private message

By: AlanR - 10th November 2014 at 22:48

But in the same way that there used to be women who were unknowingly married to closeted gay men, known as ‘beards’, might not some adults come in with their own children to camouflage their intentions?

Ok, how about not admitting children ?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 10th November 2014 at 19:08

I’m sure you can still lust after him, Charlie: he is not only available during the olympics…;o)

I can’t imagine why you should think I would want to lust after him, Olympics or otherwise, but no doubt somewhere in your skewed mind you found a reason….:rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,597

Send private message

By: snafu - 10th November 2014 at 18:40

Fortunately I missed the the lusting after Tom Daley – but how ironic given that he is openly homosexual.:o

I’m sure you can still lust after him, Charlie: he is not only available during the olympics…;o)

You would have thought though, that all children would be supervised. Either by parents or school teachers ?
Perhaps they should have said that children must be accompanied by an adult at all times. There couldn’t
have been any argument with that…

But in the same way that there used to be women who were unknowingly married to closeted gay men, known as ‘beards’, might not some adults come in with their own children to camouflage their intentions?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

119

Send private message

By: victor tango - 10th November 2014 at 17:46

Creaking door re your #16
apposite as usual :applause:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,556

Send private message

By: AlanR - 10th November 2014 at 12:36

……..Likewise, you are ignoring a lot of history if you think that women are incapable of cruelty towards children, extending as far as paedophile acts.

Yes I think the figure is roughly 50/50 men/women. Maybe why they are not allowing single women either.

You would have thought though, that all children would be supervised. Either by parents or school teachers ?
Perhaps they should have said that children must be accompanied by an adult at all times. There couldn’t
have been any argument with that. Except from those maybe, that allow their little darlings to run riot and
annoy everyone else apart from them.

1 2
Sign in to post a reply