April 15, 2010 at 10:38 pm
I’m really in favor of this but is it going to happen? We have most of the technology right now and the money spent on all the wars taking place (and global warming) would easily fund the mission.
By: Stuart H - 23rd April 2010 at 00:15
Burt Rutan could probably get to Mars and have enough spare change from the Ansari X Prize for a curry afterwards.
By: Al - 21st April 2010 at 10:20
He’s too old to be JFK reincarnated…
By: Blue_2 - 21st April 2010 at 10:12
I doubt I’ll be around to see it anyway
By: Red Hunter - 21st April 2010 at 08:22
Nah, we’ll be space hoppin in a thousand years. What’s the death date of the Sun? About 3 billion more isn’t it?
Or, do you think we’ll be zonked by an Asteroid, or a nuclear war?
Whatever our fate I’m sure it will befall us long before the sun starts to die.
By: groundhugger - 20th April 2010 at 23:37
I thought the USA was skint …
By: PeeDee - 16th April 2010 at 21:53
Nah, we’ll be space hoppin in a thousand years. What’s the death date of the Sun? About 3 billion more isn’t it?
Or, do you think we’ll be zonked by an Asteroid, or a nuclear war?
By: Red Hunter - 16th April 2010 at 19:36
I fear that long before it becomes a red lump we will have either left and found another solar system or we’ll all be gonners. My money is on the latter.
By: PeeDee - 16th April 2010 at 18:27
Hmm – Obama’s a wiley politician……
Well, he’s certainly full of the same shipt all the rest of them are.
When the Sun turns into a Red Lump, we need to populate another Solar system. Mars isn’t far enough away. But living on it may teach us how to migrate to another world.
By: Bruggen 130 - 16th April 2010 at 16:26
No, he shut down a rocket program that would cost 50% more than the shuttle (per launch) and carry half the payload.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/jonathanamos/2010/04/mr-obama-pitches-for-asteroids.shtml
Whether it’s the moon or Mars, the important thing is that manned missions continue to push the boundaries of what is possible.
I think there has also been a boost for this particular research:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_specific_impulse_magnetoplasma_rocketWhich could reduce flighttime to mars to only 39 days!!! Here’s hoping! 🙂
1 feb 2010
He cancelled the Ares-1 rocket that would have taken America back
to the moon in the Orion module, I think that included all the large
boosters that would have gone to Mars, I might be wrong but if I am
i’m shure someone will correct me:D
By: Red Hunter - 16th April 2010 at 16:16
Hmm – Obama’s a wiley politician……
By: jbritchford - 16th April 2010 at 15:43
No, he shut down a rocket program that would cost 50% more than the shuttle (per launch) and carry half the payload.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/jonathanamos/2010/04/mr-obama-pitches-for-asteroids.shtml
Whether it’s the moon or Mars, the important thing is that manned missions continue to push the boundaries of what is possible.
I think there has also been a boost for this particular research:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_specific_impulse_magnetoplasma_rocket
Which could reduce flighttime to mars to only 39 days!!! Here’s hoping! 🙂
By: Bruggen 130 - 16th April 2010 at 13:42
Hang on a minute, hasn’t he just cancelled the rocket program that was
going to be used for just that task?
By: Fleet Shadower - 15th April 2010 at 23:37
^^^^^^^^ And she was sent there on a one-way ticket.
By: J Boyle - 15th April 2010 at 22:50
My guess…
He’s talking a good game to look good to the moderates in the near term…
but he’ll never get around to spending the big money to get it done…to look good to his social welfare friends who have largely been against space funding.
Also, remember under the U.S. Constitution, the President can’t budget or spend money.
The Congress does the budgeting…so he could still try to look good while doing a back room deal with his party (assuming that they’re still the majority) NOT to fund something.
It gives him a chance to say..”I tried…”.
The only way he’d fund a mission is if Sarah Palin was the mission commander.:D