March 20, 2010 at 6:02 pm
Just got some bits in and one of the parts isn`t Stirling it has the numbers 57 156 BH3……any ideas anyone?
By: jeep1943 - 27th January 2021 at 04:32
Would I be safe in assuming Beaufighter?
By: jeep1943 - 27th January 2021 at 04:18
The doors.
Look like flaps to me.
By: bazv - 28th November 2017 at 23:39
Hi Carnaby – sorry no further thoughts – my brain cell given up 😀
I assumed there were no markings on the back but just thought worth asking.
rgds baz
By: carnaby - 28th November 2017 at 22:31
Bazv you are correct about the panel in that it was picked up loose at the yard along with a selection of other misc panels and bits which were kicking around (the lot cost me a fiver from memory !) so I suspect it ended up there as part of a job lot of components and bits from some RAF base. No component numbers on the other side that I can see just lots of muck and gunk on it. Not sure if the attached photos help but welcome your further thoughts as to what it may be. I have just noticed on the other side the letter A stamped next to where the “serial” is painted I suspect other numbers may be under the paint.
Thanks
Carnaby
By: bazv - 28th November 2017 at 21:10
Just another quick question – are there any markings on the other side ?
Normally any plates etc for repairs/mods etc would be marked both for a/c number and the location of the plate (ie stbd lower etc).
By: bazv - 28th November 2017 at 20:53
I have doubts that the panel was removed from an a/c scrapped on site (ie at Siddal) – it looks to have been removed fairly carefully in that the rivet heads appear to have been drilled out neatly and having a second look at the close up I can see ‘Peen’ marks (centre punch marks) at some of the fastener holes which means that some countersunk bolts/screws have been carefully removed as well.
So maybe it was removed from an a/c and then later scrapped along with other loose parts/components ?
It is a reasonable/feasible size for a canberra mainplane strengthening plate !
rgds baz
By: carnaby - 28th November 2017 at 19:50
The dimensions are 950mm x 145mm (at its widest). I am also struggling to find a likely Canberra that would fit with the serial number ending 142 so maybe it is a mod/sti number after all but it does look like a serial number especially with two letters and three numbers. I acquired it many years ago from the yard of J.Shackleton at Siddal near Halifax – will have to see what Canberras went there. Thanks for the help so far.
By: bazv - 28th November 2017 at 11:56
Well as far as I can tell – there was no B (I)8 with the serial No 142.
However I guess that even though it has a B(I)8 part number it would also be compatible with other marks ofCanberra mainplanes (esp B6 onwards).
Another possibility I guess is that it could have been marked with the Modification/STI number which introduced the strengthening plate.Most mod/sti work components would have the mod/sti number painted on them.
Although I do agree it looks more like an a/c number.
What are the dimensions Carnaby ?
By: carnaby - 27th November 2017 at 21:19
Thanks bazv that’s very helpful
By: bazv - 27th November 2017 at 20:42
Hi Carnaby
Just for info…
As Alan posted EA 9 = B(I)8
20 = Panels and Doors
1378 = would identify the exact part
Canberra part number system.
-00- General Assemblies
-04- Electric Equipment (modified)
-10- Front Fuselage
-11- Centre Fuselage
-12- Rear Fuselage
-15- Canopy
-17- Insulation
-20- Panels and Doors
-24- Ailerons
-25- Flaps
-30- Tailplane
-31- Elevator
-32- Fin
-33- Rudder
-40- Undercarriage
-45- Flying Controls
-46- Automatic Pilot
-47- Engine Controls
-50- Cowlings
-51- Engine Mounts
-53- Starting
-56- Fuel Tanks
-57- Fuel Delivery
-60- Fire Protection
-61- Gearbox & Generators
-62- Tanks, Jettison
-70- Air for Armament
-71- Oxygen
-73- Hydraulics
-74- Air Conditioning
-75- Pressurization
-76- De-Misting
-80- Pitot & Static
-81- Electrical Equipment
-82- Radio and Intercom
-83- Rain Repellant
-84- Ballast (not Navigators)
-85- Explosives Related (Cartridge start & Destructers)
-88- GSE
-90- Radar Equipment
-97- Armament
By: carnaby - 27th November 2017 at 19:59
Thanks for the replies -very helpful. Looks like it is off a Canberra – now to try and work out which one!
By: bazv - 27th November 2017 at 10:33
Looks like an external doubler plate (stiffener/strengthening plate) such as is often used on mainplanes,note the chamfered Leading Edge and countersunk fastener holes.The Canberras certainly had mainplane structural problems through the years – I was involved in a major STI (special technical instruction) in 1973ish which resulted from a wing structural failure,I cannot remember if we fitted external plates but I do remember cutting through double skin areas with a large hole cutter to facilitate inspection panels (a job the team members took strictly in turn LOL – we hated doing it),although funnily enough our team leader was a navy PO who was not qualified to use cutting tools as he was not a ‘Tiffie’.The reason that we had a navy team leader is that all the Squadron Airframe Fitters were temporarily moved into the maint Hangar to complete the job quickly and our PO came from 360sqn.
There were a couple of Canberras with 142 as serial number but only took a quick glance on ‘ukserials.com’ so did not come to any firm conclusions.
By: Alan Clark - 26th November 2017 at 19:41
EA 9 is Canberra, seems to be a B(I) Mk.8.
By: ericmunk - 20th September 2015 at 18:02
A canopy/window vent of sorts?
By: rich_hodgetts - 20th September 2015 at 17:26
A view from the other side

By: Alan Clark - 20th September 2015 at 15:43
Other than it looks like perspex I can’t tell much about it, any chance of more photos from different angles please?
By: hindenburg - 9th May 2010 at 15:14
di you want that bit Cees?
By: CeBro - 21st March 2010 at 11:31
I am waiting:p
Cees
By: hindenburg - 20th March 2010 at 19:23
True CD……..I`ll have to send a pic to Cees
By: Creaking Door - 20th March 2010 at 18:06
Aren’t ’57’ parts Halifax?