dark light

Peak-District 'Dambuster' Tours in a Tiger Moth

A nice idea, but the 500 foot rule will preclude 60 feet swoops over the dam itself.

”Pilot, Will Flanagan, 32, said: ‘All the Lancaster pilots would have learnt to fly in a Tiger Moth just like this one.
‘I fly as low as I can on the ‘Dam Buster Run Missions’ but I can’t imagine how they managed to fly those bombers at only sixty feet above the water – especially with people shooting at them.
‘I get a buzz from flying it, the provenance, smell and feel of an open cockpit – there’s nothing like feeling the wind blowing through your hair – it’s what I’d call real flying.
‘I recently flew an RAF veteran who’d worked as a ground based engineer on Lancasters during the war – he had never flown in a Lancaster but wanted to know what it felt like to fly over the dams. He found it very emotional – it’s a very nostalgic trip for some of the older guys.”

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2142346/Following-slipstream-giants-Pilot-offers-low-level-Dambusters-flights-69-years-reservoir-brave-crews-trained.html#ixzz1uVTANaRw

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

741

Send private message

By: Alan Clark - 11th May 2012 at 01:42

Is he sure they all trained on Tiger Moths? There’s a good chance at least a couple did their EFTS courses on Magisters, or maybe even something like a Hart as some of the pre-war E&RFTS establishments flew those (among other types) and they continued into the earlier part of the war.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

741

Send private message

By: Alan Clark - 11th May 2012 at 01:42

Is he sure they all trained on Tiger Moths? There’s a good chance at least a couple did their EFTS courses on Magisters, or maybe even something like a Hart as some of the pre-war E&RFTS establishments flew those (among other types) and they continued into the earlier part of the war.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

250

Send private message

By: Dave Wilson - 10th May 2012 at 23:57

Don’t forget it’s 500′ away from vessels, structures and people, which means in theory as long as you’re at 500′ when over the dams, easily done with a pull up, you can fly down the reservoir at whatever height you like, so long as there are no canoeists etc on it.

It would be p*** p*** airmanship but it wouldn’t be illegal.

Mind you, is a reservoir classed as a ‘structure’?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

250

Send private message

By: Dave Wilson - 10th May 2012 at 23:57

Don’t forget it’s 500′ away from vessels, structures and people, which means in theory as long as you’re at 500′ when over the dams, easily done with a pull up, you can fly down the reservoir at whatever height you like, so long as there are no canoeists etc on it.

It would be p*** p*** airmanship but it wouldn’t be illegal.

Mind you, is a reservoir classed as a ‘structure’?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,736

Send private message

By: richw_82 - 10th May 2012 at 23:07

If what I’ve seen fairly regularly while walking around those reservoirs is anything to go by, the 500 foot rule doesn’t put all that many off. Last time I was up there the local Police helicopter was having a crack at re-enacting the dams raid practices.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,736

Send private message

By: richw_82 - 10th May 2012 at 23:07

If what I’ve seen fairly regularly while walking around those reservoirs is anything to go by, the 500 foot rule doesn’t put all that many off. Last time I was up there the local Police helicopter was having a crack at re-enacting the dams raid practices.

Sign in to post a reply