dark light

Phantom Disposal

I was talking to a couple of people at RAF Leuchars yesterday. They told me that due to the closure of the base there are two Phantoms, one Tornado and a Lightning being put up for disposal.
Get your cheque books ready!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

540

Send private message

By: Binbrook 01 - 10th August 2014 at 19:54

Ah yes I’m getting ahead of myself David….

Although they have flown the first trials of SS on a Tiffie, they appear to be having some delays in the conformal tanks I believe. Don’t think they can carry one without the other………..Doh

As Storm Shadows go where the fuel tanks do. Well at least that what I recall reading!!

TS

Didn’t we sell a load of surplus Speys to the Chinese…….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 10th August 2014 at 11:27

‘Dave’ doesn’t have a massive effect on the retirement date of Tornado . The modification of Typhoon to carry Storm Shadow and Brimstone is the factor that decides the OSD of Tornado. Storm Shadow has already been carried on Typhoon and the contract to pay for finishing integration is paid.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

540

Send private message

By: Binbrook 01 - 9th August 2014 at 22:28

Canopener Al

Its not so much who wants a Tornado, its a case of will there be any left at the rate they (GR.4s) are already going into the RTP !

Thumbs up that Midland AM got Gulf Killer, But look at the amount of F.3s left (Not very many)

And I bet you that BAE will be keen to supply parts to other users once ours have been flattened The Germans Italians and Saudis are planning to continue using them into the next decade, as for UK 2019 is the current swings and roundabout retirement date (Assuming DAVE) actually works!! or has no more engine fires.

Tim S

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

265

Send private message

By: Canopener Al - 9th August 2014 at 19:22

I don’t disagree in many ways, but when the MoD is tasked by Whitehall to get the best return they can on sale of surplus items, it’s money that talks.

For government, preservation equates to the service museums, plus the IWM. Posterity is served.

The dealers do get some preferential treatment I understand, as they will clear the airframes off base with a minimum of fuss, with no requirement for assistance, and they leave the site as they found it. Not saying that others wouldn’t do the same, but even I have left oil on a pan where it shouldn’t be when rescuing an aircraft for display.

You have firmly hit the nail on the head Bruce and there is competition between the bidders. However getting frames is all well and good, but when they have been stripped to spares recovery like the Jags were, try getting the bits and pieces required to get them running from the aviation spares companies. AVspares website will list them. The days of 5K airframes is well over until a load of Tornadoes get disposed off.. But who wants a Tonka? I would like to hear from people wanting to run a phantom down a runway. A bit hard without some Spey 202s. Not exactly a type of engine likely to get off a shelf after 22 years.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

505

Send private message

By: Bunsen Honeydew - 7th August 2014 at 07:42

Its about time the value of these aircraft went up. Not to long ago a complete Lightning could be purchased for less than the scrap value. Now however with prices going up the scrap man wont (perhaps) be so keen, so more should be saved…..hopefully!

Not sure about that.

As I recall, aircraft usede to go for less than their scrap value because they were mixed metals and the cost of separating the metals to convert them into ingots was relatively high. With a couple of exceptions, scrap dealers were sympathetic to museums and collectors, if you approached them politely you could usually purchase the entire aircraft for not much more than was originally paid. I know the scrapping of the Javelins from Stafford and West Raynham was considerably delayed to give Museums time to collect them but in both cases the interested museum(s) couldn’t/didn’t get their act together and the aircraft were cut up.

Now that they go to preferred aircraft dealers no one can afford the asking prices so, as mentioned above, they sit rotting away in a field. So less aircraft enter preservation than before.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 6th August 2014 at 21:14

The tender pretty much puts them on a lorry !

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

88

Send private message

By: pully113 - 6th August 2014 at 11:54

Does anyone no the fate of ZE967 the F3 she is not on the tender?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,578

Send private message

By: DaveF68 - 6th August 2014 at 10:05

Am I right in thinking that this is the first time an ex-RAF Phantom has come up for public disposal?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 6th August 2014 at 08:47

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sale-of-phantom-aircraft

This is the disposal Document

great link. To quote:

“Sale of quantity two Phantom FG1 aircraft (without engines): tail numbers XV582 and XT864 and quantity one lightening F3 aircraft (without engines): tail number XR713. Located at RAF Leuchars, St Andrews, Fife”

well if you take the engines out that does lighten it a bit, I suppose :rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

900

Send private message

By: Last Lightning - 6th August 2014 at 08:40

Its about time the value of these aircraft went up. Not to long ago a complete Lightning could be purchased for less than the scrap value. Now however with prices going up the scrap man wont (perhaps) be so keen, so more should be saved…..hopefully!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

596

Send private message

By: Runway06 - 6th August 2014 at 08:26

In light of the recent auction prices and the media publicity around it I can see a few people looking at business opportunities to cash in on the potential value that these airframes could provide when sold in an open market to a wider audience. These airframes have probably come on the market at the right time for the MOD but the wrong time for the restorer/enthusiast. No doubt they will all competitively be sought after.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,370

Send private message

By: Bruce - 6th August 2014 at 08:04

I don’t disagree in many ways, but when the MoD is tasked by Whitehall to get the best return they can on sale of surplus items, it’s money that talks.

For government, preservation equates to the service museums, plus the IWM. Posterity is served.

The dealers do get some preferential treatment I understand, as they will clear the airframes off base with a minimum of fuss, with no requirement for assistance, and they leave the site as they found it. Not saying that others wouldn’t do the same, but even I have left oil on a pan where it shouldn’t be when rescuing an aircraft for display.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 6th August 2014 at 00:22

The dealers are not paying auction prices though to the Mod in prefered bidding !!! Preservation in the U.K cannot manage to pay auction prices and many would argue why should they if their intention is public display and education- not resale. I recall the first batch of Sea Harriers that went out were something like 5K a piece and an RAF Harrier in the last few years that would have been similar money . The Mod needs to review its policy on disposals and talk to the BAPC to try and find more effective ways of getting the significant airframes into the right places.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,370

Send private message

By: Bruce - 5th August 2014 at 23:01

Money talks guys. Sadly, the days of getting any airframe for free or peanuts are over. Look at the prices obtained for the harrier and Tornado recently. As long as there are people willing to pay that, then the preservation world has to up its game, and start to raise serious money if they want to stay in business.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 5th August 2014 at 18:54

One Phantom should be donated to an appropriate museum in Scotland to commemorate the use of the type in the country. These tenders are a clearer way of allowing museums to get a bid in for something – speaking to people regards the Lightning -the sums of money entering the pot for these airframes for museums to have a chance against dealers is frightening !

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

895

Send private message

By: Thunderbird167 - 5th August 2014 at 18:44

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sale-of-phantom-aircraft

This is the disposal Document

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

562

Send private message

By: CADman - 5th August 2014 at 18:36

Copied from Fighter Control

Phantom FG.1’s XT864 & “Black Mike” XV582 are up for sale. Also, the F.3 Lightning XR713 is also available for sale from Leuchars.

Info via – https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati … m-aircraft
more info – https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s … rcraft.pdf

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,125

Send private message

By: TwinOtter23 - 20th July 2014 at 13:25

I’m not 100% certain but I thought FOI requests did not necessarily cover items that might be deemed ‘commercially sensitive!’ :confused:

As for Greek A7s I understand that the company ‘brokering’ those is no longer trading!! 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,042

Send private message

By: TonyT - 20th July 2014 at 12:31

Vixen, have you considered asking Greece for a retiring Corsair 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

205

Send private message

By: heli1 - 20th July 2014 at 11:19

Worth a try Martin but don’t these dealers actually act as agents for MoD sometimes and get a commission on the sales?
Maybe a letter to the new Minister of Defence will provoke a response?

1 2
Sign in to post a reply