dark light

  • J Boyle

Phantom production numbers

Just going through a book and I note that it’s been almost 31 years since the last U.S.-built Phantom was completed (a S. Korean F-4E) on 25 Oct. 1979.
That’s enough to make us feel old.

That led me to wonder if there was a concensus on how many were built.

According to Francillion’s McDonnell Douglas Aircraft since 1920, Vol II. (Putnam, 1990) production records that indicate 5068 made by McDonnell (including 11 built in the US but assembled in Japan) and 127 license built in Japan for a total of 5195.

But, UK author Bill Gunston writes in Plane Speaking (Patrick Stephens Ltd, 1991) that the correct number is 5211 “…and not 5057, 5081,5195, or any other popular total”.

(I can also very highly recommend his earlier books, Early Supersonic Fighters of the West, Bombers of the West and Attack Aircraft of the West..all have detailed political and technical histories of aircraft).

Any of you have opinions on the total?
I have to admit that the production numbers (broken down by block numbers and military serials) listed by Francillion make a strong case. And there was no production block or sale of 16 planes making a simple error unlikely.

Also, I recall reading somewhere, (probably Air International) many years ago, that a Phantom fan was trying to collect photos of every Phantom ever built.
Anyone else recall that…and know if he was successful?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 16th October 2010 at 12:26

…F-4 and the F-16 are converted by British Aerospace in the US how patriotic does that make you feel (-:
curlyboy

I don’t mind, it has a huge US arm and I’m sure lots of American shareholders and unlike many other firms, does the work here creating jobs.
At least it’s not Chinese…yet. 😀

Feel free to inspect my garage, there is a Mercedes and my wife’s new Volvo…(sorry the Mini left) I’m a pragmatist.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 16th October 2010 at 09:47

IIRC, for some reason, they’re only using Es and RFs…

The E & RF models were the most modernised as the RF-4C had many updates and was one of the last Phantoms in use by the USAF this is sort of true with the E as the E has the most of any model built so there were lots more of them about.

Pagen01 i agree it makes me feel old the F-16 is now to be blown up for trials but ironically both the F-4 and the F-16 are converted by British Aerospace in the US how patriotic does that make you feel (-:

curlyboy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 16th October 2010 at 09:26

the F-4 drone programme is winding up…

…it is the turn of the F-16 now.

Now that does make me feel old!!:eek:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 15th October 2010 at 22:43

But the F-4 drone programme is winding up even though there was over 1000 F-4’s still at AMARG…curlyboy

IIRC, for some reason, they’re only using Es and RFs…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 15th October 2010 at 22:15

All drone F-4’s were converted service aircraft as they all carry their own service serials and some aircraft had histories but most ended up in flaming pieces although the USAF was considering keeping one flying as a memorial as most are E models and at least one was repainted into it’s original Vietnam colour scheme.

But the F-4 drone programme is winding up even though there was over 1000 F-4’s still at AMARG (or whatever it is now called) up until a few months ago but it is the turn of the F-16 now.

curlyboy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 15th October 2010 at 20:51

Gooday All

rem,ember reading somewhere where new phantoms pretty much streight off the production line were converted into target drones and shot down. Liked phantoms, thought it was a waste

cheers

I’ve never heard that.
And the Putnam book does not support that.
The USN had sone orange drones in the 70s when they were still fairly new, but they were not considered expendable drone…missiles were programmed for near misses (but close enough where you didn’t want a pilot onboard) rather like the USAF QF-104s and QB-47s in the 50s and 60s.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 15th October 2010 at 20:48

The actual figures must be known, McDonnell would have records of complete or kit aircraft produced, as would Mitsi.
.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 15th October 2010 at 19:23

The number will be a mystery as you have the prototypes to remove as the early Phantoms were obviously not ‘production’ machines but this is just knit picking.

Normally people take the US total of 5057 and add the Japanese built ones and that is the consesus total, however there was a mix up with some aircraft being given the wrong serials and some serials changed for publicity like the 3000th Phantom is supposedly a F4J but is actually a RF-4C i think so it is confusing.

curlyboy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

680

Send private message

By: GrahamSimons - 15th October 2010 at 19:22

Also, I recall reading somewhere, (probably Air International) many years ago, that a Phantom fan was trying to collect photos of every Phantom ever built.
Anyone else recall that…and know if he was successful?

I thought Bob Dorr was the supposed Phantom guy. I got some cartoon/stickers he used to hand out somewhere.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

622

Send private message

By: philip turland - 15th October 2010 at 12:13

it may have been a discrepancy with the serial numbers and the published number for the C model i am getting confused with, just cannot remember it has been so long since i studied the F-4

there was def a discrepancy somewhere and 5201 still sticks in my head

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

622

Send private message

By: philip turland - 15th October 2010 at 12:11

never ever

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 15th October 2010 at 12:11

Appart from German ones arriving and departing from airshows and hopefully/maybe participating in the odd excercise, then no.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

24

Send private message

By: jogger321 - 15th October 2010 at 12:08

Is there anywhere in the uk in the foreseeable future that it may be possible to see one fly?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 15th October 2010 at 11:53

The kits have already been mentioned, and would assume are part of the final figures (McDonnell or Mitsubishi?).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

622

Send private message

By: philip turland - 15th October 2010 at 11:44

there def some supplied as kits

i have that book also and i will try to find the reference to it. I got rid of most of my F-4 Stuff a while back but i might be able to find it

on another tack, i have lots of F-4 Slides anyone interested?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9

Send private message

By: Trenchard - 15th October 2010 at 10:11

Phantom: Spirit inthe Skies‘ edited by Jon Lake, details the F4 from block 1 to block 67 as 5,068 built in the US, with a further 127 Mitsubishi license built examples, giving a total of 5,195.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

622

Send private message

By: philip turland - 15th October 2010 at 09:22

5201 stick in my head for some reason, i think there were some kits supplied to japan, will check my sources

philip

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 15th October 2010 at 08:59

It’s a shame that website hasn’t been updated since 2008, or any extra info or pictures been added.
But I would hope that if he was that keen and set himself that goal that he has done the research and would be spot on with the production figure of 5195 Phantoms.
This might not be a populor view, I really do like Gunstan’s publications but sometimes I do wonder about the preciseness of some of the information he uses.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

408

Send private message

By: Proctor VH-AHY - 15th October 2010 at 06:38

Gooday All

rem,ember reading somewhere where new phantoms pretty much streight off the production line were converted into target drones and shot down. Liked phantoms, thought it was a waste

cheers

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

358

Send private message

By: RMAllnutt - 15th October 2010 at 04:34

Hiya… not sure on the production numbers, but here’s the guy… or a guy at least… who’s collecting the photos of every Phantom.

www.5053phantoms.com

Cheers,
Richard

PS. On looking through that site, it seems that much of it is dismantled sadly. I couldn’t find any relevant photos.

Sign in to post a reply