June 27, 2013 at 12:25 pm
…no casualties thankfully, but last time this happened to another jet of the Dutch Historic Jet Association the damage was eventually deemed to costly to repair… 🙁
Hopefully not this time!
Photos and video:
http://www.omroepflevoland.nl/Nieuws/103426/almere-vliegtuigcrash-bij-lelystad-airport
By: Stratofreighter - 30th June 2013 at 23:27
A photo of the recovery now at http://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=97107 .
There must be damage, but it is very hard to see…
By: TonyT - 30th June 2013 at 20:02
The A-10 is designed so it can land on its wheels when retracted, as they protrude on purpose for such an eventuality. Puma is similar, though you’d lose a loaf of aerials etc of them.
Suprised he could retract the gear as one would have thought it would have squat switches on it.
By: Archer - 30th June 2013 at 19:53
Are there any aircraft who could raise their undercarriage after a belly landing and then get wheeled in to the workshops or aren’t u/c legs that strong?
They usually aren’t that strong, the forces on the u/c during such an attempt are very different from a normal extension and the actuators etc would not be able to cope with that. What does usually happen though is that the a/c is lifted off the ground and the gear is then extended so that it can be moved on its wheels.
Edit: I just thought of flying boats with amphibious gear. I guess they are the only ones that can extend the gear after a belly landing and continue taxiing :D:D
By: ericmunk - 30th June 2013 at 08:54
Are there any aircraft who could raise their undercarriage after a belly landing
I think you’ll find that quite a substantial number of the landings mentioned involved raising the undercarriage BEFORE the belly landing.
By: WP840 - 29th June 2013 at 22:09
Are there any aircraft who could raise their undercarriage after a belly landing and then get wheeled in to the workshops or aren’t u/c legs that strong?
By: TonyT - 29th June 2013 at 18:26
Flap lever must of been out of reach then lol
By: Wyvernfan - 29th June 2013 at 08:29
Magister incident – On PPRuNe its been reported that “Aircraft was performing a touch and go but the pilot in the rear seat selected gear up instead of pushing the throttle forward. Apparently the levers are close together”.
Rob
By: Mike J - 27th June 2013 at 22:25
A Hunter had some type of gear or brake issue at Scampton today as well.
By: Wyvernfan - 27th June 2013 at 22:11
I think the photo actually proves him wrong. The undercarriage has collapsed. A Magister sits low on its undercarriage. But not *that* low.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/2278153/L/ :apologetic:
Rob
By: TonyT - 27th June 2013 at 17:40
Nice aircraft to fly in, but not recommended after a skinfull
By: ericmunk - 27th June 2013 at 16:00
you are quite correct. 😉
I think the photo actually proves him wrong. The undercarriage has collapsed. A Magister sits low on its undercarriage. But not *that* low.
By: Stratofreighter - 27th June 2013 at 15:21
I could be wrong but judging by the crops it looks to be still on its (short) undercart.
Rob
Another photo has now come to light. According to http://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=97107 you are quite correct. 😉
It concerns this Fouga Magister:
http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=157270
By: Wyvernfan - 27th June 2013 at 14:41
I could be wrong but judging by the crops it looks to be still on its (short) undercart.
Rob