So how do we feel about new engine design with old technology? I think the inline design holds true to thje original and hold promise should the DH Gispy design suddenly end up unviable. Heresy I know to mention here but still better a flyer than a relic…
By: KZ8 - 27th January 2006 at 23:40
They got the Cub flying from Enstone with their first engine, a two-cylinder unit.
Lots of interest among homebuilders, and a retrofit Cessna conversion would be nice too.
KZ8
By: GASML - 27th January 2006 at 18:15
Mark Wilksch is actually an Aussie!
Having met him a few times at Finmere and Bicester, I can confirm he’s an all-round good egg. Good luck to him with this.
His first diesel engine installation was actually on a J3 Cub, but I don’t think they got to fly that, befoe they started installing them on Europas, Thorps and things. That Pietenpol looks a jolly nice bit of kit too.
By: BlueRobin - 27th January 2006 at 16:30
Have you considered that the Wilksch is a British engine! 😉
By: Auster Fan - 27th January 2006 at 16:07
I must admit that a similar thought had crossed my mind, particularly where Austers are concerned. Aside from the Mark IV/V and the odd marks that had American engines to start with, I’ve always wondered what suitable in-line replacement could be had once the Cirrus and Gipsy engines reached the end of their useful lives. Admittedly, I’d rather see one with a Lycoming etc if it meant that an airframe could stay airworthy, but I tend to think it spoils the lines somewhat.
Sign In
January 27, 2006 at 2:55 pm