dark light

Plane Accident in Seville (Air Algerie B737-600)

source: http://www.jacdec.de (incl. pics)
<<
DATE: 18.03.2006
LOCAL TIME: ~ 10:25
LOCATION: Seville-Intl AP (LEZL)
COUNTRY: Spain
AIRLINE: Air Algerie
TYPE: Boeing 737-6D6
REGISTRATION: 7T-VJQ
C/N: 30209
AGE: 3 y + 11 m
OPERATION: INP
FLIGHT No.: –
FROM: Oran
TO: Seville
VIA:-
OCCUPANTS:
PAX: 101
CREW:x
FATALITIES:
PAX: 0
CREW: 0
OTHER: 0
INJURIES:
PAX: 45
CREW:x
OTHER: 0
DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT: substantial
On landing roll the right main gear collapsed causing substantial damage to the right wing structure before coming to rest (partially) beneath runway (27/09, 3300 m). Injuries occured during emegency evacuation. The 737 was chartered by spanish families who host West Saharian children refugees in algerian camps for holidays in their home. Seville airportΒ΄s single runway was blocked for hours to ensure rescue operations.>>

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 20th March 2006 at 16:40

Yes, you did. Please understand that I go against claims if they have no validation and especially don’t like if they are done “by-the-way”. Feel free to do the same with my claims.

It wasn’t a claim per se. Just a tongue in cheek jibe.
I am fully aware how these tests are undertaken πŸ˜‰

There is no need to be so oversensative though this is not Airliners.net 😎

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,480

Send private message

By: Schorsch - 20th March 2006 at 16:15

Clearly I’ve hit a nerve.

Yes, you did. Please understand that I go against claims if they have no validation and especially don’t like if they are done “by-the-way”. Feel free to do the same with my claims.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 20th March 2006 at 15:20

Just a valid thing: the evacuation is done “by night”. So either wait for the night or use a hangar and switch off the light. No need to use ” :rolleyes: ” because this is common practise even with super-safe Boeing aircraft.

Clearly I’ve hit a nerve.

The :rolleyes: were meant to convey my comment as tongue in cheek. Perhaps a “:p” would have been better.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,480

Send private message

By: Schorsch - 20th March 2006 at 13:45

They’re waiting for favourable conditions :rolleyes:
I think they’ve even asked the CAA and FAA if they can conduct the tests indoors. “For participant safety”. I’m sure it is merely a coincidence that the upper slides were blowing away in the slightest wind. πŸ˜‰ :diablo:

Just a valid thing: the evacuation is done “by night”. So either wait for the night or use a hangar and switch off the light. No need to use ” :rolleyes: ” because this is common practise even with super-safe Boeing aircraft.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 20th March 2006 at 12:39

Seen a few pics of this 736.

Seems like a pretty hard landing had forced the landing gear support beam (false spar) to punch through the wing a little. It has dislodged the trailing edge flaps and the gear now rests swept backwards.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,017

Send private message

By: paulc - 20th March 2006 at 11:44

The evacuation test shown on the 777 program 21st Century Jet was also done inside.

Participant safety is a valid reason as you do not want to put people at an unnecessary risk – they are all volunteers as well. A certain % would probably have done 1 or more slides previously so would know what to expect.

Did Boeing ever do a full evacuation on the 400 model using the upper deck slides as these would be of a similar height to the A380 top deck ones.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 19th March 2006 at 22:36

Has that certification test occured yet? Rumours were that it was in March sometime.

They’re waiting for favourable conditions :rolleyes:
I think they’ve even asked the CAA and FAA if they can conduct the tests indoors. “For participant safety”. I’m sure it is merely a coincidence that the upper slides were blowing away in the slightest wind. πŸ˜‰ :diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

602

Send private message

By: Dantheman77 - 19th March 2006 at 20:42

Here is a link to see a pic.

www.airdisaster.com/user-uploads/737-12.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,085

Send private message

By: tomfellows - 19th March 2006 at 18:32

If it has, then I’m sure the Airbus website will have news on it πŸ™‚

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,766

Send private message

By: philgatwick05 - 19th March 2006 at 15:36

Has that certification test occured yet? Rumours were that it was in March sometime.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,085

Send private message

By: tomfellows - 19th March 2006 at 14:43

but top deck A380!

let’s hope it never happens for real πŸ™‚

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,766

Send private message

By: philgatwick05 - 19th March 2006 at 13:33

Indeed. It always seems to be the evacuations that cause injuries though.

Sliding from a 737-600 must be pretty bad…but top deck A380!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,085

Send private message

By: tomfellows - 19th March 2006 at 13:28

Sounds like pretty serious damage to the aircraft, glad to hear injuries were minimal πŸ™‚

Indeed. It always seems to be the evacuations that cause injuries though.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,766

Send private message

By: philgatwick05 - 18th March 2006 at 22:50

Well a 737-600 is a NG.

Yes I felt a bit silly when I’d posted then read the thread title :rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,812

Send private message

By: LBARULES - 18th March 2006 at 22:26

Well a 737-600 is a NG.

Sounds like pretty serious damage to the aircraft, glad to hear injuries were minimal πŸ™‚

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,766

Send private message

By: philgatwick05 - 18th March 2006 at 22:23

According to Reuters only 6 were actually injured although 45 were taken to hospital as a precaution. It’s a 737NG as well by the looks of it

Sign in to post a reply