December 18, 2005 at 5:28 pm
Hello all,
Does anyone have any views on using polarising filters on the lens in sunny conditions. (For ground to air shots)?
Is it worth it? or more trouble than it’s worth.
Thanks
Dean
http://onebigworld.fotopic.net
By: Bruggen 130 - 20th December 2005 at 19:16
Hi
I’ve used them a lot, both for static and ground to air, i have one on the lens for most shots 😀






By: dean f - 20th December 2005 at 18:38
Polarisers
Cheers guys,
I thought i’d find out different peoples opinions on this subject,
I realise the angle of the sun will make alot of difference to the amount of polarisation that the filter will give, also that the filter would act like a ND but this is not so much of a problem as i work for a filter manufacturing company and have access to clear filters such as 1/4 wave retarders and such, so i might be able to make something up from this.
Now if i can just get the sun to move with my lens………..
Thanks
Dean 🙂
By: Jur - 20th December 2005 at 09:37
Polarisers are not very practical in ground to air photography. Not only do they reduce the exposure, the polariser effect also changes with the direction the lens is pointing to (because of the relative position of the sun). My advice: forget about using a polariser for ground to air photography and limit its use for more static subjects, like landscapes or maybe aircraft on the ground to darken the sky and to make the clouds stand out more.
By: EN830 - 19th December 2005 at 07:59
I have several, and have used them on occasion. They produce some interesting contrasts. However you have to remember that they act like a ND filter and will reduce your exposure by up to one stop.
By: ollieholmes - 19th December 2005 at 00:22
I personaly have one for my old fillm camera but i have never used it. I just try to avoid needing to use them.