dark light

Possible RAF UXO

I’ve been made aware and I quote “we have dug up drums 45 ish gallon size when with rails poss to make rolling easier on them when broken the contents a gel crystallise and harden” Alarm bells rang with me,can’t think of a lanc ordinance matching this?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,892

Send private message

By: mike currill - 1st September 2014 at 09:54

When in doubt, call the bomb disposal team. I’m sure they don’t mind.

Definitely call bomb disposal. They would much rather be called to something which turns out to be harmless than someone get hurt because they weren’t called.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,409

Send private message

By: Trolly Aux - 1st September 2014 at 08:20

This song springs to mind for me

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,360

Send private message

By: Bager1968 - 1st September 2014 at 08:13

Several sources I have (just) looked up confirm that shrapnel can refer both to specific contents of a shell or bomb, and fragments of the case.

Moggy

Depending on whether the use is by the general public or by someone speaking about ordnance in an accurate technical manner.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 1st September 2014 at 08:08

Several sources I have (just) looked up confirm that shrapnel can refer both to specific contents of a shell or bomb, and fragments of the case.

However I am happy to concede a pedantry score of 1-0 to you Sir 🙂

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

219

Send private message

By: Adrian Barrell - 1st September 2014 at 07:48

If you think deeply about it it the ‘unexploded’ bit is superfluous, since if it had exploded it would be called ‘shrapnel’

Moggy

Which is, of course, incorrect. Shrapnel is the contents of the shrapnel shell, bits of shell or bomb casing are fragments.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

783

Send private message

By: pimpernel - 1st September 2014 at 05:56

Wasn’t Judy Geeson in a prog called Danger UXB? Moggy

She was indeed Moggy.

You can watch the whole series on youtube too.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 31st August 2014 at 18:08

That would make a certain amount of sense, but I’m old fashioned enough to prefer the B version. Wasn’t Judy Geeson in a prog called Danger UXB?

If you think deeply about it it the ‘unexploded’ bit is superfluous, since if it had exploded it would be called ‘shrapnel’

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

546

Send private message

By: Lazy8 - 31st August 2014 at 12:45

Isn’t UXO (= UneXploded Ordnance) just the modern version of UXB (= UneXploded Bomb) ?
It’s ‘inclusive’ – covers incendiaries, cannon shells, anything that might go BANG…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 31st August 2014 at 12:13

Wot ericmunk said ^^^^^^^^^^^

I think the Cookie was in sections of about that diameter.

(The Mark 1 4000 lb bomb was a welded, cylindrical shell, made of 0.31-inch (7.9 mm) thick steel. The body of the bomb was 30 inches (76 cm) in diameter )

Always better safe than sorry.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,519

Send private message

By: ericmunk - 31st August 2014 at 08:48

I’ve been made aware and I quote’weve dug up drums 45 ish gallon size ish when with rails poss to make rolling easier on them when broken the contents a gel crystallise and harden”alarm bells ring with me,can’t think of a lanc ordinance matching this?

When in doubt, call the bomb disposal team. I’m sure they don’t mind.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 31st August 2014 at 08:43

Was that meant to be ‘UXB’ ?

Moggy

Sign in to post a reply