dark light

(Post-) WW2 aircraft profile illustrations

http://www.flitzerart.com/

๐Ÿ˜ฎ ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚ :dev2: :diablo: ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€

Smilies say more than 1000 words…..

Notice:
If someone posted this link before, I used the search function and didn’t find any match!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,043

Send private message

By: fightingirish - 23rd November 2006 at 18:56

@ Cranswick: “What if” versus “What really”!!!
I am seldom in Historic forum and have not your knowlegde of the RAF in WW2. ๐Ÿ™‚

@ northeagle: Slรกn is gaelic for “Goodbye”, not my nickname. ๐Ÿ˜€

The site is not my site, just found it sailing through the WEB 2.0

Btw. today that site had an update

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

177

Send private message

By: Cranswick - 21st November 2006 at 19:42

Have I missed something here? Some just-adequately rendered profiles full of errors (eg the Typhoon has the wrong exhausts, incorrect serial number, yellow LE stripes far too wide, no underwing stripes on the front view), parroting others inaccurate research (the green/grey Whirlwind should have black stripes between the white ones and the wing tips were black; the markings were for Operation ‘Starkey’, more than a year after ‘Dieppe’ as quoted). The ‘projects’ are more interesting but many (especially the postwar ones) feature inappropriate schemes.

So what exactly are these illustrations offering us? Trouble is, ‘profiles’ seem to acquire a quite unjustified authority – much like the ‘published word’. Oh dear I don’t seem to be able to find the right ‘smiley’….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

231

Send private message

By: northeagle - 21st November 2006 at 12:01

Hi Slan,
Nice profiles. The Spitfire ones are shown as reversed though, Polish one is 616 Sqdn etc. Also, you have a typo in the squadron number. Should read 616 not 615. Did Johnson fly this one? It seemed to be the squadron ‘dog’. Heppell and Ralph Hogg both had landing accidents in it in October.

Robert.

Sign in to post a reply