February 20, 2011 at 5:14 pm
Just read Comets post on what he read re inmates being put to death by legal Lethal injection.This was in the Daily Mail, ( MOGGY, do not look at this Post,as it,s in your not so favourite paper!!.)
Is it time it was re introduced in this country, Providing the Criminal, has A) Admitted his crime..B) All evidence is conclusive BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT..C) D.N.A. has proved conclusivly, that the criminal was at the scene, and his DNA was on the weapon used and on the victim.
Lincoln. 7
By: Grey Area - 23rd February 2011 at 18:13
Surely that is a perfect case where the death penalty would seem appropriate?
I was referring to the second murder, actually.
You do agree that it was murder, presumably?
By: pagen01 - 23rd February 2011 at 18:09
Surely that is a perfect case where the death penalty would seem appropriate?
I was thinking earlier on of those that have killed children, even through neglect like the babyP case, that are 100% properly identified and where there can’t be aggrevating factors, I’m afraid I feel that only a death sentance is suitable for these people, rather than being in a nice cell at our expense.
By: Grey Area - 23rd February 2011 at 18:02
Killed in Jail 😎
Colin Hatch
He was jailed for life in 1994 after being convicted of killing seven-year-old Sean Williams while on parole for a previous child sex attack
Ah… so you’re not howling for the death penalty for murders that you approve of?
There’s a word for that sort of thing. Begins with “H”.
By: Grey Area - 23rd February 2011 at 18:00
Moderator Message
AND, I’m not being offensive to those afflicted with such things, just stating life.
It could certainly be taken that way, so think before posting in future.
Not everyone is as thick-skinned as you appear to be.
Thanks
GA
By: PeeDee - 23rd February 2011 at 17:43
Killed in Jail 😎
Colin Hatch
He was jailed for life in 1994 after being convicted of killing seven-year-old Sean Williams while on parole for a previous child sex attack
By: PeeDee - 23rd February 2011 at 17:42
Exactly. When you first become attracted to your partner, is it because you’re thinking about what any possible offspring would be like? Hardly.
So, if she had clear Mongolism, brain damage etc. but was a wonderful person and you had the same sense of humour, you’d have Married?
Gimme a break.
AND, I’m not being offensive to those afflicted with such things, just stating life.
By: Sky High - 23rd February 2011 at 17:37
Oh yes it is.
Partly.
Men are such simple creatures :p
Speak for yours……..;)
There is certainly a good cross section of male /female relationships in this thread but fortunately few eugenicists!!
By: BSG-75 - 23rd February 2011 at 17:27
PeeDee – sorry, but I chose my wife because we enjoyed each other’s company, loved each other, and had common interests. We did NOT choose each other in order to secure a strain of Sky Highs – what utter rubbish!:mad:
Exactly. When you first become attracted to your partner, is it because you’re thinking about what any possible offspring would be like? Hardly.
So did I, but that didn’t work out, kids are great but as for her…. :rolleyes:
I’d stick with Pagen01’s notion….. much safer…. and then follow the advice of my best friend since school days, simply stated if it has boobs or wheels, its far better to rent it….
after all, at the end of the day, if you meet somebody new she is only single because some other bloke is fed up with putting up with her !:eek:
By: Lincoln 7 - 23rd February 2011 at 16:53
Precisely, I was attracted to mine because she banged like an outside privy door in a storm!
Didn’t we ALL if we were honest, I mean you wouldn’t buy a car without a test drive now would you ?.
I remember those days when you couldn’t afford a lock on the privvy door at the END of the garden!! Toilet paper on a roll, no, squares of newspapers on a bit of string hanging on a nail, at least you could read whillst doing the U know what. Damned cold in the Winter though.:eek:
Lincoln .7
By: Grey Area - 23rd February 2011 at 16:48
…. and we were having such a sensible discussion. :rolleyes:
By: pagen01 - 23rd February 2011 at 16:33
When you first become attracted to your partner, is it because you’re thinking about what any possible offspring would be like? Hardly.
Precisely, I was attracted to mine because she banged like an outside privy door in a storm!
By: Lincoln 7 - 23rd February 2011 at 16:07
does that not mean you can earn more before paying tax?
Baz
Is there a slight hint of sarcasm here,:p no way, code number has gone DOWN meaning Tax has gone UP.
Trouble is though that nothing has changed since last changed.
I think I am going to get a tin of the old brown boot polish and head off to the reception area at Dover.:D:D
Who knows Rodders, this time next year I could be a Millionair.
By the way, are you out of Hospital yet?.
Lincoln .7
By: BumbleBee - 23rd February 2011 at 16:00
Exactly. When you first become attracted to your partner, is it because you’re thinking about what any possible offspring would be like? Hardly.
Oh yes it is.
Partly.
Men are such simple creatures :p
By: Lincoln 7 - 23rd February 2011 at 15:57
He ‘s a very quiet dictator – we never seem to hear anything from him….:diablo:
Nail on head, WE DON’T, but the TREES DO.;)
Lincoln .7
By: spitfireman - 23rd February 2011 at 14:26
I just received my new Tax code for this coming Tax year, yes, youv,e guessed it, it’s gone up….
Lincoln.7
:rolleyes:
does that not mean you can earn more before paying tax?
Baz
By: Mr Creosote - 23rd February 2011 at 12:44
PeeDee – sorry, but I chose my wife because we enjoyed each other’s company, loved each other, and had common interests. We did NOT choose each other in order to secure a strain of Sky Highs – what utter rubbish!:mad:
Exactly. When you first become attracted to your partner, is it because you’re thinking about what any possible offspring would be like? Hardly.
By: Lincoln 7 - 23rd February 2011 at 11:33
Now, Now, James, if you do things like that, your just another do gooder who has given them everything they have now, I just received my new Tax code for this coming Tax year, yes, youv,e guessed it, it’s gone up, love to know why, I am thinking of applying for meals on wheels, do you think I would get 3 square meals a day as they do?.Dream on L7!!!!
Lincoln.7
:rolleyes:
By: pagen01 - 23rd February 2011 at 11:16
That will be the next thing, though I was thinking of more a Lidl’s type service!
By: spitfireman - 23rd February 2011 at 10:51
Myra was very calculating she didn’t go mad.
She was pretty desperate to get out, which gave a lot of people satisfaction when the government said ‘NO’.
Look at Peter Sutcliffe, definately not having a good time in prison!
I think most of the boasting is to wind up the public and the victims families.
We just need a cheaper way to keep them locked up (Tescos prison service?)
Baz
By: Sky High - 23rd February 2011 at 10:45
He ‘s a very quiet dictator – we never seem to hear anything from him….:diablo: