dark light

Queens speech limited access to nhs for migrants

Okay,it’s all good in words BUT how will it work.You walk down the street ,the person in front collapses.Someone dials 999 ambulance turns up and the person gets life saving emergency treatment,post op help and rehabilitation at the costs of tens of thousands of pounds.This person has no money,no entitlement under the new rules to help.

Migrants’ access to the NHS would be restricted and temporary visitors would have to “make a contribution” to costs. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22437884

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,693

Send private message

By: jbritchford - 10th May 2013 at 14:31

Chas, If you live in the USA, and, just say you are hit by a car, and taken to Hospital, the first thing they ask, is, “Are you Insured?.” If not, my understanding is that you get sent to a lesser hospital, where the treatment is not as good as it would have been, if you did have Insurance.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

My understanding is that insured or not, they cannot deny you life saving treatment, but they can still invoice you for it. Either way, medical bills are the number one cause of bankruptcy in the US.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 9th May 2013 at 19:34

Already to-day (D. Tel. 9th May) various medical heads are popping over the parapet to announce that no one should think that they are about to take on a new role of health policemen. Haven’t they got enough to do? No wonder A & E are stuffed to the brim. It is the only way for ‘sticking plaster’ tourists to see a quack – quick.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th May 2013 at 19:58

Well it has to be worth a try – it’s better than doing nothing. And don’t forget the dreaded Blair Border Agency has been scrapped. Time will tell as to whether the scrapping has been an improvement or not.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 8th May 2013 at 19:29

I think that this is less about the onus of charging and more about the vexed question of ‘health tourism’ and how to deter it by by publicising the imposition of an effective charging regime.

Well, that will work, won’t it ?

Surely better to make the possession of an elementary level of medical insurance a condition of entry to this country. Without it, you get sent back.

Given the noted efficiency of the Border Agency that should work well.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th May 2013 at 13:56

Admittedly it was a long time ago but I was an emergency patient in Arizona and was dealt with quickly and without questions. But probably because I was a visitor and would have had some form of accident insurance – it was so long ago I have forgotten. I am sure that within the EU and perhaps the Antipodes and Canada you would be treated without question.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 8th May 2013 at 13:51

Chas, If you live in the USA, and, just say you are hit by a car, and taken to Hospital, the first thing they ask, is, “Are you Insured?.” If not, my understanding is that you get sent to a lesser hospital, where the treatment is not as good as it would have been, if you did have Insurance.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th May 2013 at 13:44

I haven’t read the speech and some limitations were widely expected. But surely it’s the same here as indeed in most other first world nations, emergencies are treated as such, no questions asked, until possibly afterwards. Some will slip through that net but as a drain on resources, it will be negligible, I would have thought.

Sign in to post a reply