dark light

Query For A Wellington Enthusiast

While just looking through my grandad’s RAF pictures, I realised that while I’ve looked up the fates of all the Stirlings and Lancasters that show their serials in the piccies, there’s one of a Wellington which I’ve never looked up; the serial shown looks like X9817, and it will quite probably be either from 9 or 149 squadrons; can anyone with the right book look this up for me?

Thanks! 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,142

Send private message

By: paulmcmillan - 15th April 2003 at 14:48

Nitam

I was interested in your post

What was the source of your info?

If it was a book, i would like to know which one!

Thanks

Paul

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,275

Send private message

By: Bluebird Mike - 14th April 2003 at 22:54

‘Nitram’, you’re a star mate, thanks! That’s narrowed down the piccie of my grandad to a very short period of time, as that’s definitely taken during the aircraft’s 149 sqdn period. (‘His’ sqdn for the whole war.)

Re. the 9 sqdn Wimpey-I guess the first on your list, L7789, is our plane, as he was at 9 sqdn briefly around the dates you give, but was at 149 for the dates on the other two-nice work, Sherlock!

That’s fantastic, thanks!

Mike

😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

21

Send private message

By: Nitram - 14th April 2003 at 18:49

Wimpies

X9817 I have serving with 149 Sqn 20.08.41 to 06.12.41 when it went to 214 Sqn

9 Sqn Wellingtons
IA L7789 Y 14 Ops 22.04.40 to 03.07.40
III X3289 10 Ops 26.09.41 to 06.12.41
III X3389 Y 39 Ops 08.03.42 to 11.07.42

Nitram

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,275

Send private message

By: Bluebird Mike - 13th April 2003 at 17:20

😀 😀 😀 😀

It worked! Ha! I’ve also got another of Grandad’s Wellington pictures-this time just a negative which I’ve yet to have developed-that shows ‘WS-Y’ of 9 Sqdn, though this time the serial is obscured by the tail plane-I’d guess that the last three numbers were either ‘389’, or ‘789’ though. I could be completely wrong there of course!!!

Cheers,

Mike

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,275

Send private message

By: Bluebird Mike - 13th April 2003 at 17:17

Fingers crossed…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,275

Send private message

By: Bluebird Mike - 13th April 2003 at 17:11

Thanks both ever so much for your replies-I had just assumed that there HAD been a ‘Wellington File’ to be quite honest!

The picture I have is fairly early war, and quite possibly was taken when my grandad was being trained somewhere or other-I’ve yet to fully decipher his exact dates/moves on his service papers, as they were apparently written by an inky spider!!!

😮

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,395

Send private message

By: kev35 - 13th April 2003 at 16:51

Can’t find a reference to X9817 in the OTU volume of Bomber Command Losses. Perhaps it was SOC as having reached the end of it’s airframe life.

Regards,

kev35

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,142

Send private message

By: paulmcmillan - 13th April 2003 at 16:10

X9817 – Wellington IC

101/214/22 OTU/105 OTU SOC 9.8.44

Air Britain Serials W1000 – Z9999

I am happy to be be proved wrong but I believe their was no Wellington File

I have never found reference to it in any Air Britain books

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,395

Send private message

By: kev35 - 13th April 2003 at 11:39

No, but….

Lancman,

have you an approximate time-frame? If so, I’ll check Bomber Command Losses for you.

Regards,

kev35

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,275

Send private message

By: Bluebird Mike - 13th April 2003 at 09:51

Nobody got ‘The Wellington File’ then? 🙁

Sign in to post a reply