October 20, 2003 at 9:11 am
I don’t intend to start a debate on the morals of flying vintage aircraft, but I’ve often heard it said that there have been more aircraft lost in museum fires in the last decade than their have in crashes.
Where were these fires, and roughly how many aircraft have been destroyed in them?
I can think of the Canadian Warplane Heritage fire, where the Hurricane and Spitfire were destroyed…
I think there was also one in France?
(re-posted with less worrying title!)
By: DazDaMan - 21st October 2003 at 13:32
SpitfireMK – Which aircraft is the one in your second photo?
By: SpitfireMK - 21st October 2003 at 13:23
It’s very sad that it happened.
The b-29 also claimed the life of one of the recovery crew.
Who worked himself literaly to death!

By: DazDaMan - 21st October 2003 at 13:06
Sad to think that this plane was so close to becoming the second airworthy B-29 in the world!
By: SpitfireMK - 21st October 2003 at 12:49
Although not a museum fire.
It’s a sad los of the tragic attempt to fly the b-29 kee bird of a greenlad icecap.
Just when the aircraft came at full power a fire broke out in the APU consuming a incredebile piece of aviation history.
(The pic is quite big and I don’t how to make it smaller)

By: gbwez1 - 20th October 2003 at 23:51
In addition to those already mentioned an aviation Museum in Uruguay was destroyed by fire in the late 90s. Once fire takes hold in an aircraft Museum collection – particularly when fabric covered aircraft are involved – it is extremely hard to stop.
However, this being said I think it is factually incorrect to say that more historic aircraft have been destoyed in Museum fires than in accidents with historic aircraft. Check out the NTSB website, you can search their database of accidents in the USA. Taking just one aircraft manufacturer in one country, there have been 102 accidents involving North American types since 1993, and 58 fatalities.
By: duxfordhawk - 20th October 2003 at 20:21
sad to say
The reason fires in collections dont hit big news because unlike a airshow crash they are not normally such a shocking or gory thing as a plane crash,modern news runs on shock horror violence and alike so they enjoy it and it sells.Every large colection is at risk from fire more than crashes.
By: Nermal - 20th October 2003 at 15:14
Any hoo, no lumberjack jokes neither sur.
Nermal.
By: Arabella-Cox - 20th October 2003 at 14:07
Originally posted by DazDaMan
…was a brick wall! It was pushed out of harm’s way by ground crews, I believe.
Strong lads, them Canadians… 😀
By: DazDaMan - 20th October 2003 at 13:29
I remember reading the “only” thing seperating the CWH Lancaster from the others that perished in the fire in ’93 was a brick wall! It was pushed out of harm’s way by ground crews, I believe.
By: trumper - 20th October 2003 at 13:09
🙂 ok,they just don’t seem to grab the headlines so we don’t hear about them [unless you look for them or live local to them].Also fire in hangars don’t get the “lets stop the old planes flying brigade” shouting,also on a lives lost basis,i imagine it is alot smaller.
Anyway lets keep restoring them to be up where they belong and hope we can also improve the fire retardent systems in hangars.
Just out of interest,how can you remove the aircraft in the museums such as the American one at Duxford when they’ve been hung up on ceilings ,what about Hendon etc.Seems to me to make sense tio keep access doors easily available and the wheels and tyres moveable so the planes can be pushed /towed out of the way if possible.
By: Mark V - 20th October 2003 at 12:47
Trumper,
The point being made here is that when a museum fire occurs, as unfortunately they have a number of times in the last 20 – 25 years, the loss rate is often much greater than that experienced in flying accidents which generally involve only one machine. I think there were up to 40 aircraft completely destroyed in the San Diego disaster alone.
By: Steve Bond - 20th October 2003 at 11:51
The Le Bourget fire was a major disaster; a large number of aircraft, including some sole survivors of type, were destroyed.
By: JohnH - 20th October 2003 at 11:20
The Sept 2000 Airspray fire was at least 4 Invaders. The French museum fire was alot……including an F5 P-38 Lightning, A-26 Invader and more…..don’t have the exact figure in front of me. Hangar fires also destroyed a Sea Fury in Bakersfield in 1988 (and others) and also in Iowa the same year, a shop was restoring a two seat Sea Fury for Kermit Weeks and it went up, there may have been another in there also. The CWH fire also destroyed their TBM Avenger.
JH
By: trumper - 20th October 2003 at 10:47
http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16347
Somewhere on this thread there is a mention of more aircraft being lost in fires than in crashes,i can’t see how.I personally have seen half a dozen plane crashes in this country alone ,all at displays but not all fatal ,Thank god.
I dread to think how many there have been in the USA alone this year,now with a wildcat added to to list.:(
By: Mark V - 20th October 2003 at 10:35
There was a fire in a South American national museum in (I think) the early 1990’s. The other one can remember was San Diego in the 1978 when the aerospace museum was destroyed by arson.
By: Marauder - 20th October 2003 at 10:21
OK, not a museum, but one of the Canadian fire fighting outfits (Air Spray or Conair?) lost a number of A-26 Invaders in a hangar fire about 3 or 4 years ago.
By: ken_murray - 20th October 2003 at 10:02
The North East Aviation Museum at Sunderland lost a Vickers Valetta to arson in 97.
more info on their website here
By: DazDaMan - 20th October 2003 at 09:16
It was Le Bourget, I think. The only plane I can remember being lost in it was an early MkIX Spitfire, BS464. I may have got the location wrong, but not the plane!