dark light

Quick ID Quiz

Found this tech drawing in a old book, anybody know 🙂
Phil.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,847

Send private message

By: Dave Homewood - 28th May 2005 at 09:49

Wow!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: Flanker_man - 28th May 2005 at 09:36

I think both of these aircraft are gorgeous.

Was this the first such piggyback arrangement in the world?

The Soviets – under Vladimir Valhmistrov – had a whole series of parasite fighter/piggyback designs under the generic title ‘Zveno’ (Flight).

Starting in 1931 with a twin-engined TB-1 bomber and two I-4 fighters mounted on top of the wings, the series progressed to the ‘Aviamatka’ – a four-engined TB-3 bomber with FIVE fighters attached – two on top of the wings, two under the wings and a Grigorovich I-Z fighter on a trapeze under the fuselage.

One variant – the Zveno-SPB was a TB-3 with two I-16 fighter-bombers under the wings – was used during WWII to successfully bomb the bridges & oil pipelines at Constanta in Romania.

I made a couple of models of these – the TB-1/I-4 is at :- http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelArticles/Duffy/Zveno1/index.php

The Aviamatka – including some history – is at :- http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelArticles/Duffy/Aviamatka/index.php

Another model I made is the USAF ‘Project FICON’ (FIghter CONveyor) – a B-36 with an F-84 on a trapeze – see :- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/models_pages/ficon_modl.htm

Ken

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,847

Send private message

By: Dave Homewood - 28th May 2005 at 05:58

I think both of these aircraft are gorgeous.

Was this the first such piggyback arrangement in the world?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,092

Send private message

By: dhfan - 28th May 2005 at 05:45

Hi. Just in from work
Well dhfan you should not have because that’s what it is, well done
st170dw 😀
Phil.

Bum

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 28th May 2005 at 01:02

Heh.

What a corker. Certainly Shorts put a lot of effort into ‘adding lightness’ and keeping it simple – I don’t think. May as well have added an interlink between the pilot’s themoses (themii?)

Brilliant quiz. I was completely thrown by the angle iron on the bottom section.

Cheers!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,639

Send private message

By: Melvyn Hiscock - 27th May 2005 at 20:08

Goblin… 😉

There was no need to be rude.

He’s probably just got a headache.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,114

Send private message

By: Bruggen 130 - 27th May 2005 at 19:01

I hope not, I’d already discarded that idea!

Hi. Just in from work
Well dhfan you should not have because that’s what it is, well done
st170dw 😀
Phil.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,092

Send private message

By: dhfan - 27th May 2005 at 09:57

Release mechanism from the Mayo Composite?

I hope not, I’d already discarded that idea!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

119

Send private message

By: st170dw - 27th May 2005 at 09:50

Release mechanism from the Mayo Composite?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

43

Send private message

By: Rob Beard - 27th May 2005 at 08:52

LATCH

Release mechanism for dropping a bi-plane from underneath an airship

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 27th May 2005 at 07:30

Goblin… 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,114

Send private message

By: Bruggen 130 - 27th May 2005 at 07:21

It’s a corker!

Is it the right way up?

The tubular bits look at a glance like Hawker’s, but not under closer examination.

It’s so overcomplex it’s GOT to be British.

You wouldn’t want to get your fingers caught in it!

Wild guess would be release gear for aircraft to airship – DH-53?

Your on the right lines JD, and yes it is the right way up, i thought of putting
it on upside down but did’nt 😀
Phil.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 27th May 2005 at 07:15

It’s a corker!

Is it the right way up?

The tubular bits look at a glance like Hawker’s, but not under closer examination.

It’s so overcomplex it’s GOT to be British.

You wouldn’t want to get your fingers caught in it!

Wild guess would be release gear for aircraft to airship – DH-53?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,092

Send private message

By: dhfan - 27th May 2005 at 07:04

Quick-change undercarriage, floats to wheels?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

575

Send private message

By: JonathanF - 26th May 2005 at 23:56

Me163 dolly mech?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,114

Send private message

By: Bruggen 130 - 26th May 2005 at 23:47

Jimw’s on the right track 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

575

Send private message

By: JonathanF - 26th May 2005 at 23:17

Could be, but the flay-rod looks a little out of skew on t’treddle…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 26th May 2005 at 22:46

Slipping mechanism for the Hilson Bi-Mono. 🙂

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,614

Send private message

By: Archer - 26th May 2005 at 22:18

Looks like a gear lock to me. DC-3 downlock mechanism??

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

575

Send private message

By: JonathanF - 26th May 2005 at 22:13

Folding wing mechanism…Swordfish? Wild guess.

1 2
Sign in to post a reply