dark light

Quiet spike

See
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2006/10/17/Navigation/198/209945/N…

How suitable are the Concorde noses for retrofitting the Quiet Spikes? And what about Tu-144s?

Aerion is now taking money for SSBJ-s, too – though they still do not have any manufacturer…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,480

Send private message

By: Schorsch - 16th November 2007 at 17:53

Check it for yourself just in case Flightglobal edits it. A manufacturer whose plane enters service 4 years before the manufacturer makes agreement!

Although I have the printed version of the Flight International weekly on my desk, and although I value this magazine as one the best cross-over information sources in the business, they do mistakes and sometimes jump on doubtful projects. The size of an article does often not relate to the real feasibility of a project.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

760

Send private message

By: chornedsnorkack - 16th November 2007 at 15:38

Which is first class fraud.
They don’t have a manufacturer.
They don’t have engineering resources.
They don’t have capital.

They do have a time machine, though:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/11/14/219563/dubai-2007-uae-sheik-signs-for-aerion-supersonic-business-jet.html

Aerion is in discussions with candidate aircraft manufacturers to serve as programme integrator for the SSBJ and says it anticipates an agreement in the first half of 2018, allowing the aircraft to enter service in 2014.

Check it for yourself just in case Flightglobal edits it. A manufacturer whose plane enters service 4 years before the manufacturer makes agreement!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,480

Send private message

By: Schorsch - 13th November 2007 at 19:53

Aerion is now taking money for SSBJ-s, too – though they still do not have any manufacturer…

Which is first class fraud.
They don’t have a manufacturer.
They don’t have engineering resources.
They don’t have capital.

Sign in to post a reply