December 23, 2011 at 6:57 am
A friend has recently purchased a Grumman Goose 1A, the former FP511 for restoration to flight.
It’s a JRF-6, a Goose 1A, one of fifty ordered by the British Purchasing Commission but taken over (paid for) by Lend Lease. Of the 50 ordered, the UK eventually received 44 while others went to the USAAF and one went to Bolivia.
One question, were the Geese operated by the FAA or RAF? My books seem to indicate RAF but I found the FP511 serial from the FAA Archieve website.
Obviously, my friend is extremely interested in learning about its wartime service. Any photos would be very welcome as well.
My friend estimates it should be flying in 3-4 years.
Thanks, John
By: Duggy - 23rd December 2012 at 19:06
If he was to paint it in Military markings??
Then surely the one in IJN markings would be the show stopper IMO
Link – http://www.axis-and-allies-paintworks.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?2685
Regards Duggy.
By: DaveF68 - 23rd December 2012 at 17:05
Re colours: Temperate Sea Scheme is a pretty safe bet, given that the Goslings operated similarly were in that scheme. There is a good colour picture of a Grumman hangar showing a range of aircraft types, and although I can’t be certain it may include a Goose in TSS. I’m not sure where this has been published, but I’d look in the Jeff Ethell’s books first.

By: Graham Boak - 23rd December 2012 at 15:17
Re colours: Temperate Sea Scheme is a pretty safe bet, given that the Goslings operated similarly were in that scheme. There is a good colour picture of a Grumman hangar showing a range of aircraft types, and although I can’t be certain it may include a Goose in TSS. I’m not sure where this has been published, but I’d look in the Jeff Ethell’s books first.
By: blackjet604 - 22nd December 2012 at 22:53
FP478 colliding with a Blackburn Shark, another rare aircraft! Well that had to be in the Trinidad area, the Goose with 749 Squadron, andf the Shark perhaps 750 or 755 squadron?
FP492 lost on 2.9.42, circumstances unknown…but all lost.
Seems that the training school area set aside in Trinidad was on a greater war footing than expected as the shipping and U-boat traffic in the area became busy in 1942…Havent found any ohter real infomation other than 749 Squadron, then a few to 24 Squadron as VIP aircraft at Hendon, perhaps a few operated in that Squadron by ATA pilots on ferry duty, returning crews? Little information on these planes…
Portugese use has been further understood that several “Flying Boat” G-21’s were used in Macau until 1960? or so with the 3rd Regiao Aerea, as well as the Azores …however all I have found today is one small picture…neat in retrospect, as I had not seen this one before…
http://aerodino.no.sapo.pt/g-21.html
and then I found this….believed to be ex NX 107…can anyone ID the other stuff in the scrapyard…date unknown!!!
http://forum.modelismo-na.net/viewtopic.php?f=98&t=13933&start=60
By: Dr. John Smith - 4th January 2012 at 14:16
RAF/FAA Grumman Goose history needed
Talking of a Grumman Goose in unusual markings, Channel 4 is currently showing the 1967 movie “Tobruk” (starring George Peppard and Rock Hudson)…
The connection to this thread is early on in the movie, which features a Grumman Goose in overall light grey colours, and fake Luftwaffe markings.
Wonder which aircraft was used? It is probably meant to be HK822 (although it probably is not that actual aircraft) which would have been “in the right place and time” (North Africa, September 1942).
So, which Gooses (Geese?) were airworthy in 1967, at the time this film was made? Could it be FP511, which started this thread?
By: Dr. John Smith - 4th January 2012 at 14:16
RAF/FAA Grumman Goose history needed
Talking of a Grumman Goose in unusual markings, Channel 4 is currently showing the 1967 movie “Tobruk” (starring George Peppard and Rock Hudson)…
The connection to this thread is early on in the movie, which features a Grumman Goose in overall light grey colours, and fake Luftwaffe markings.
Wonder which aircraft was used? It is probably meant to be HK822 (although it probably is not that actual aircraft) which would have been “in the right place and time” (North Africa, September 1942).
So, which Gooses (Geese?) were airworthy in 1967, at the time this film was made? Could it be FP511, which started this thread?
By: AdlerTag - 1st January 2012 at 14:18
In answer to J Boyle’s question, yes I’d love to see a Goose in RN colours! To be honest, there seems to be a bit of a shortage of Geese in military colours of any sort, so any military scheme would be welcome.
I don’t know for sure, but I would hazzard a guess that they were finished in the temperate sea scheme. I say this based on the fact that Grumman purchased British paints for the Wildcat and Hellcat production lines (rather than mixing thier own or using approximate US-spec colours) and it would make sense for the Geese to be painted up the same.
By: Rogier - 1st January 2012 at 10:44
Is the pic that I have contributed in #15 in Temperate Land or Temperate Sea colour scheme?
The censor may well have obliterated the serial number, so is it possible to identify it at all?
By: wieesso - 1st January 2012 at 07:39
More photos of RN Geese 1As in the FP range would be welcome.
Just out of curiousity, how excited would the UK historic aviation community be to see it in its wartime colours? (Not that it’s my decision mind you…)
Pick one….
1. Very Much! 🙂
2. Yes, it would be nice.
3. Not really since its a minor type…and American
4. Don’t care since I won’t see it and it won’t be at Legends…
Wish you a good new Year 2012!
By: J Boyle - 1st January 2012 at 06:16
More photos of RN Geese 1As in the FP range would be welcome.
Just out of curiousity, how excited would the UK historic aviation community be to see it in its wartime colours? (Not that it’s my decision mind you…)
Pick one….
1. Very Much!
2. Yes, it would be nice.
3. Not really, since its a minor type…
4. Don’t care since I won’t see it and it won’t be at Legends…
By: Rogier - 31st December 2011 at 18:58
Please help identify Goose I
Source: ‘Aircraft of The Fighting Powers’ from 1942 and another book whose title page has been lost but on pg 170 it states:
“Photo shows JRF-6B….” and is credited to Grunman Aircraft.
By: brewerjerry - 24th December 2011 at 13:28
Hi,
they have four flying here in BC, but have unfortunately lost two since I have been here.
But they may have technical info that might help.
cheers
Jerry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Coastal_Airlines
On August 3, 2008, a Grumman Goose aircraft with seven passengers and crew crashed during a flight from Port Hardy to Chamiss Bay. The aircraft was completely destroyed by a fire. There were only two survivors.
On November 16, 2008 a Grumman Goose aircraft with 8 passengers and crew crashed during a flight from Vancouver International Airport to Toba Inlet, BC. The plane exploded into a mass of burning wreckage according to the lone survivor. This person was rescued up by the Coast Guard on South Thormanby Island off British Columbia’s Sunshine Coast
By: AdlerTag - 23rd December 2011 at 23:26
“The Geese operated out in the Caribbean etc have I understand had a bit of a chequered history.There was a very detailed documentary in the Air Crash Investigation series about the Geese being operated between the Islands by one of the companies following a rather unpleasant accident. Mike E”
I think what you might be referring to are the Mallards that were operated by Chalks, who’ve since gone bust.
By: J Boyle - 23rd December 2011 at 23:06
The Geese operated out in the Caribbean etc have I understand had a bit of a chequered history.There was a very detailed documentary in the Air Crash Investigation series about the Geese being operated between the Islands by one of the companies following a rather unpleasant accident. Mike E
My friend is well aware of the problems the type (and others) have with corrosion and age-related issues. He is a aeronautical engineer, CEO and owner of an aerospace-related firm. The Goose will be his 19th restoration of vintage aircraft ranging from a Super Cub to an AT-6, to an award winning Beech Staggerwing, all done as a hobby for personal use. In short, before spending any money on an aircraft, he did his homework, knew what to look for and did a very detailed inspection of the aircraft. He spoke to owners and specialist shops so he knows what issues to look for.
My friend is a perfectionist…he does work to a very high standard and has the resources to make sure the aircraft is safe.
In other words, not a “cowboy”.
His particular aircraft has a very sound airframe, with much recent work to the hull and keel done by two previous owners but never completed. It’s been in a museum for years and while its primary flight controlls are fitted, other subsystems; electrical, fuel and oil, need to be reinstalled. He already has a set of Grumman drawings for the aircraft.
When completed, it will be in his personal collection and used for pleasure flying…from fresh water.
By: wieesso - 23rd December 2011 at 20:27
N95467 as an example had three known accidents with three different probable causes
27.8.65
http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=73469&key=0
5.12.67
http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=15430&key=0
11.11.78
http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=38783&key=0
By: Mike J - 23rd December 2011 at 19:31
Firebex,
Are you sure you have your facts straight about the Goose issues? I understood that the problems you are referring to applied to the Mallards.
By: Firebex - 23rd December 2011 at 19:18
Please excuse the damp squid comment and questions to follow.
The Geese operated out in the Caribbean etc have I understand had a bit of a
chequered history.There was a very detailed documentary in the Air Crash
Investigation series about the Geese being operated between the Islands by one
of the companies following a rather unpleasant accident .It seemed the
maintenance was shall we call it politely less that it should be and the main
problem seemed to resolve around unauthorized modifications and un
reported problems involving as I recall corrosion in and around the Fuel tank
bay in the wing root area.This was highlighted by leaks etc.It was mainly as
a result of poor maintenance and previous overhaul. I am not suggesting for
one minute your friend may have any such issues but I felt it being
highlighted might help.I don’t know if anyone else is familiar with the issues
that could be passed on and looked into for piece of mind.
With that aside it will be very good to see one flying on the show circuit we
are somewhat lacking war amphibian types except for a couple of catalinas.
Mike E
By: Dr. John Smith - 23rd December 2011 at 18:25
RAF/FAA Grumman Goose history needed
Air Britain’s Fleet Air Arm Aircraft 1939 to 1945 entry for FP511 states ‘Deld 31.12.42; 749 Sqn Piarco (“W2R”) 3.43 – 8.43; Retd USN post war as Bu66331’.
66325/66361:Grumman JRF-6B
Serials reallocated from cancelled PB4Y-2 batch. Royal Navy records show a direct purchase of 50 Goose IA aircraft with C/ns 0181B/0230B and serials FP475/524 (BW778/827 originally allocated but Not Taken Up) and no previous US Navy identities listed. The book “Fleet Air Arm Aircraft 1939 to 1945″ states that bureau numbers 66325/61 were allocated when the aircraft were returned to the US Navy after the war. It may well be that the serial block 66325/66374 was allocated in the optimistic hope that all the planes would be returned the US Navy.
“Fleet Air Arm Aircraft 1939 to 1945” gives the following serial tieups for some of the returned aircraft:
66325: Previously FP488.
66326: Previously FP496. Unusually, this aircraft is recorded as being fitted with radar.
66327: Previously FP503.
66329: Previously FP521. Another radar-equipped aircraft.
66330: Previously FP483.
66331: Previously FP511.
66332: Previously FP515; later became N74588.
66333: Previously FP522. Another radar-equipped aircraft; later became N74676.
66335: Previously FP523. Another radar-equipped aircraft.
66336: The book states that FP514 is noted in RN records as having become 66366, but they believe it to be correctly 66336, which apparently later became N95431.
66337: Previously FP512.
66339: Previously FP480.
66340: Previously FP482.
66341: Previously FP516.
66343: Previously FP510.
66350: Previously FP501.
66351: Previously FP485.
66352: Previously FP495.
66353: Previously FR498. Another radar-equipped aircraft.
66355: Previously FP475; I had this as becoming 66325, which according to the book was FP488.
66356: Previously FP486.
66357: Previously FP497. Another radar-equipped aircraft. I had this as FP500, which according to the book went directly to Bolivia and was not returned to the USN.
66358: Previously FP502.
66359: Previously FP479.
RN serial FP472 was a Goose I ex USN JRF-5 BuNo 37796, and appears to have no connection with BuNo 66361.
source: http://www.joebaugher.com/navy_serials/thirdseries7.html
By: Airfixtwin - 23rd December 2011 at 17:55
IWM have a photo of MV993 in their archive, if that helps any.
By: Lynx815 - 23rd December 2011 at 17:37
Air Britain’s Fleet Air Arm Aircraft 1939 to 1945 entry for FP511 states ‘Deld 31.12.42; 749 Sqn Piarco (“W2R”) 3.43 – 8.43; Retd USN post war as Bu66331’.