dark light

RAF Herald C Mk.1 vs Andover fuselage dimensions

Does anyone know the respective fuselage diameters of the Herald and the Andover (presumably the latter is the same as the HS 748)?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

870

Send private message

By: Graham Boak - 16th November 2016 at 21:46

Pre-nationaisation. He just didn’t think enough money was on the table.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

319

Send private message

By: Zebedee - 16th November 2016 at 20:44

There was a high winged 748 proposed for the Indian Air Force I believe… the 758…

https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7319/27264199011_8ef4bb644f.jpg

Avro 758 by Martin Winchester, on Flickr

Zeb

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

459

Send private message

By: HP81 - 16th November 2016 at 20:40

The Herald airframe looks alot more suitable for military conversion, no need for a knealing undercarriage etc. But of course Sir Fred wouldn’t be nationalised!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

319

Send private message

By: Zebedee - 16th November 2016 at 20:37

From the Handley Page HP124/1 brochure… dated May 1962…

Zeb

[ATTACH=CONFIG]249707[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]249705[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]249706[/ATTACH]

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

231

Send private message

By: markb - 16th November 2016 at 14:11

Hello Graham – I have some manuals for both 748 and Herald – will dig them out for you!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

153

Send private message

By: RedRedWine - 16th November 2016 at 13:38

Have an original copy of the Military Herald brochure at home… will dig it out later…

Altitude boost pods? Was it proposed with extra jet engines then?

(Sorry it’s a bit off subject)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

590

Send private message

By: HP111 - 16th November 2016 at 11:44

There’s a slight chine to the Herald’s lower fuselage, which suggests that they weren’t quite circular.
…..

Quite right. My comment was based on a photo of a fuselage under construction that didn’t show the lower part. Just goes to show you cannot be too careful!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

264

Send private message

By: aircraftclocks - 16th November 2016 at 11:41

Sabrejet, I have failed to answer the stated question, unfortunately I can not give an exact answer to the question.

That dimension on my drawing is not very clear. But by using the scale on the drawing I have concluded it is either 8′ 8″ or 8′ 9″ OD. This would fit in with the 8′ 1″ given as the ID.
If you would like a copy of my poor drawings, drop me a PM.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

319

Send private message

By: Zebedee - 16th November 2016 at 11:39

Have an original copy of the Military Herald brochure at home… will dig it out later…

[ATTACH=CONFIG]249700[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]249701[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]249702[/ATTACH]

Zeb

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

870

Send private message

By: Graham Boak - 16th November 2016 at 11:03

There’s a slight chine to the Herald’s lower fuselage, which suggests that they weren’t quite circular.

The RAF didn’t have Heralds: but they were considered favourites for a buy which eventually was given to Avro for the Andover. There’s a recent article which deals with the procurement saga in some detail.

Thanks for the Herald diameters: I’ve been informed that the Avro 748 had an internal diameter of 8ft 1 in.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

518

Send private message

By: wl745 - 16th November 2016 at 10:54

Did the RAF have HP Heralds?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

546

Send private message

By: Lazy8 - 16th November 2016 at 10:23

This gives some cabin dimensions:
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1964/1964 – 2935.html

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

590

Send private message

By: HP111 - 16th November 2016 at 10:20

Herald brochures from the 1960s give a maximum internal diameter of 8ft 8in for an external diameter of 9ft 2in. The fuselage seems to be circular in cross section, but obviously floor and ceiling mean the floor to ceiling height is less and in fact varies depending on position from 6ft 4in to 5ft 11in.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,675

Send private message

By: Sabrejet - 16th November 2016 at 05:32

Andover Principal dimensions

Wing span 98ft 3in
Overall length 78ft
Overall height 30ft 1in

Undercarriage Type Tricycle, retractable
Track 27ft 9in
Wheel base 23ft 9in

Sorry to go all pedantic, but the OP was looking for fuselage diameters

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

264

Send private message

By: aircraftclocks - 15th November 2016 at 22:39

Andover Principal dimensions

Wing span 98ft 3in
Overall length 78ft
Overall height 30ft 1in

Undercarriage Type Tricycle, retractable
Track 27ft 9in
Wheel base 23ft 9in

Sign in to post a reply