One of my favorite Presidents of all time.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]237531[/ATTACH]
April 13, the National Archive Records Administration made available almost 250,000 pages of documents from President Reagan’s administration. It will take several months for researchers to read through the documents. The released material may yield insight into a curious comment found in President Reagan’s Diary. The entry for Tuesday, June 11, 1985 (page 334) reads:
-Lunch with 5 top space scientist. It was fascinating. Space truly is the last frontier and some of the developments there in astronomy etc. are like science fiction, except they are real. I learned that our shuttle capacity is such that we could orbit 300 people.
This is curious since the Space Shuttle holds a maximum of eight people and only five were built for space flight. Even if all five took off fully loaded it would be impossible to place and maintain 300 astronauts in orbit. Was Reagan revealing the existence of a highly classified space program that could accommodate hundreds of astronauts in orbit? Apparently so according to dozens of military and corporate whistleblowers. Hidden within one of the ten unified combatant commands of the U.S. military, Strategic Command, is a highly classified fleet of aircraft carrier sized antigravity vehicles that operate in outer space.
The United States has organized its military forces into ten unified combatant commands respectively led by a single four star General or Admiral who reports directly to the Secretary of Defense. Six of the unified commands span the globe in terms of different geographical areas. In addition, there are four functional commands where specialized military activities are run by a single Combatant Commander. From 1985 to 2002 Space Command was responsible for outer space operations by the U.S. military. In June 2002, Space Command merged with another of the functional commands Strategic Command which is responsible for a range of space, satellite, missile, nuclear and intelligence activities.
Rumors that the U.S. has a highly classified fleet of antigravity vehicles have circulated for years. On March 23, 1993, at an engineering conference in Los Angeles, Dr. Ben Rich former CEO of Lockheeds Skunkworks, showed a slide with a black disk headed for space and said: “We now have the technology to take ET home”.
Corporate and military whistleblowers have come forward to claim first hand knowledge of classified space vehicles using antigravity technology such as the Aurora and TR-3B. In his book, The Hunt for Zero Point, Jane’s Defense Weekly analyst Nick Cook writes about the Aurora: “there has been speculation since the late 1980s about the existence of a secret replacement for the Blackbird, a mythical plane called the Aurora that supposedly flew twice as fast and on the edges of space” (p. 14). Other whistleblowers such as Edgar Fouche, a former contractor with the Department of Defense, have come forward to claim that the Blackbird’s [or SR-71] replacement, the Aurora actually comprises two types of hypersonic aircraft used for space flight. He said: “The Aurora comprises the SR-75 capable of speeds above Mach 5, and acts as a mother ship for the SR-74 that can travel at speeds of Mach 18 or more into space to deliver satellites.”
More significant is the large black triangular vehicle, the TR-3B that Fouche claims generates an intense magnetic field that reduces its weight by 89 percent. He says that the TR-3B uses the Biefeld-Brown effect (created by large electrostatic charges) to reduce its weight so that more conventional propulsion systems such as scramjets can give it amazing speeds. This would be well above Mach 18 that he claims is the speed of the SR-74. Fouche claims the TR-3B is 600 feet across which would make it similar in size to an aircraft carrier.
Circumstantial evidence points to the existence of a secret space fleet of antigravity vehicles. President Ronald Reagan’s startling Diary entry for June 11, 1985, for example, reveals a space shuttle capacity that could launch 300 people into orbit. Also, on August 6, 2007, for example, NASA awarded the Human Spaceflight Support Team for assisting NASA vehicles in avoided space debris. The support team was part of USAF Space Command which is publicly stated to be the major military command providing space forces for U.S. Strategic Command.
However, neither the USAF Space Command nor Strategic Command is publicly known to have any kind of space vehicle that would assist the Space Shuttle or International Space Station from orbital dangers. Normally, both NASA vehicles would require gradual orbital corrections that would take much time and be insufficient to deal with an immediate threat. According to Ted Twietmeyer, the citation is circumstantial evidence for the existence of antigravity vehicles with advanced particle beam weapons that could remove orbital debris from the path of NASA vehicles.
The idea that a secret space fleet exists that can intervene to assist the Space Shuttle or International Space Station is also supported by the testimony of a former NASA employee. Clark McClelland worked as a SpaceCraft operator for Space Shuttle missions during 1989-1992. On one occasion he claims to have witnessed an eight to nine foot tall astronaut and what appeared to be a delta winged antigravity vehicle nearby. Since McClelland knew all astronauts in the NASA space shuttle program he assumed that the very tall being in a space suit was an extraterrestrial. While such a possibility cant be excluded, the being and the nearby delta shaped vehicle may in fact have been part of a classified Space Fleet attached to U.S. Strategic Command.
Finally, the idea of a secret space fleet using advanced technologies was boosted by a British hacker, Gary McKinnon, who faces extradition to the U.S. for hacking into U.S. government and military computers. McKinnon claims that he came across secret Pentagon and NASA files that contained a list of ‘non-terrestrial officers’, and a spreadsheet detailing ‘fleet-to-fleet transfers’. Could the tall being depicted with the two Space Shuttle astronauts actually belong to a group of “non-terrestrial officers” that periodically give assistance to Space Shuttle programs through the US Air Force’s Space Command?
Based on the available evidence from a range of sources, President Reagan’s 1985 Diary entry is a frank acknowledgement of a classified space program that can transport and accomodate hundreds of astronauts. The Diary entry suggests he received one or more briefings on the topic. Important clues may emerge from the recently released Reagan records about Strategic Command’s classified space fleet. More significantly, the public may soon learn about the advanced antigravity technologies that have been secretly developed and used for decades to fly military astronauts into deep space.
http://www.examiner.com/article/reagan-records-space-command-antigravity-fleet
I actually believe that the US has a very top secret space program which include ships. Reagan knew when he wrote in his journal that it would be
made public decades after he was gone from office. Maybe that’s why he wrote that passage down?
By: 1batfastard - 20th June 2015 at 12:05
Hi All,
CD,
I think your missing my point If Aliens do exist and have tried to communicate with us or between each other our equipment will more than likely operate in a completely different mode especially when they are many,many years in advance of us like Mr Tyson said.
You assume that these alleged Aliens have not found a way of penetrating through all types of interference that clogs up space, I suggest that if they are so advanced they more than likely will have, I further suggest that like us humans and other forms of life that we know of they would make the occasional mistakes and their machinery may throw a wobbly every blue moon.
Yes I agree with what you say about eye witnesses but that still does not prove they do not exist 100%, like I mentioned and you agreed and Mr Tyson states in the video UFO is just Unidentified and I would add to that while the majority is probably simply that like I also said the odd % cannot be explained as I also mentioned the once sceptic Dr.J.A.Hynek was of this opinion also.
Another train of thought here is that Mr.Tyson is obviously not stupid and has witnessed what has happened to those scientists who have openly stated what they really think like most who believe have become the target of ridicule and it has affected their professional status to the point where not many are taken seriously ever again. The stigma that is attached to openly admitting your true thoughts on this subject whether your a thicko like me or a highly intellectual professor who has ex amount of credential lettering after your name just gets labelled a Fantasist ETC.ETC.ETC.
If you believe that we are probably not the only intelligent life then surely it’s not that much of a stretch to have intelligent life already flying throughout the cosmos is it ? As Mr.Tyson states in his 1st video we are made up of certain material and that material is abundant throughout the whole universe so by that statement couldn’t it be quite possible that being as the universe is billions of years old and solar systems are being created and destroyed at the same time there is intelligent life either technologically behind us or more likely/Hopefully advanced than us ?
Geoff.
By: Creaking Door - 19th June 2015 at 19:49
If space is infinite, or almost infinite, wouldn’t there be lots and lots of nothing between us, the monkeys and the typewriters?
By ‘we’ being the ‘first form of life’ do you mean humans? Mammals? Reptiles? Fish?
Dinosaurs ruled the Earth for about eighty-five million years…
…that’s about eighty-five million years more than mankind has managed so far!
There could be plenty of planets out there inhabited by dinosaurs, or monkeys, (or typewriters) but unless they are flying spacecraft over Roswell or transmitting something on the electromagnetic-spectrum that we can detect we are unlikely to know of their existence. There is no reason whatsoever to assume that most, or all, alien species are at a more advanced state of development than mankind (except probability); the dinosaurs had eighty-five million years and didn’t invent the wheel…
…if it wasn’t for that meteorite would they have developed it in the next sixty-five million years?
By: hampden98 - 19th June 2015 at 18:59
Two points of discussion.
1. If space is infinite, or almost infinite i.e. really big. Shouldn’t there be lots of aliens flying around? Monkeys, typewriters and all that.
2. How do we know we are not the first form of life? Presumably it had to start somewhere. Maybe here which is why we haven’t found anything yet.
By: Creaking Door - 19th June 2015 at 09:25
Just one point if I may you say we have had the equipment to detect them there is a slight floor to that theory as has been said by those who actively listen for any contact even Seth Shostak any alien civilisation may have developed a completely different form of communication and we have as much chance as understanding what a whale is talking about…
But we don’t need to understand what the whale is talking about to prove that whales exist!
Mankind has been directing highly sensitive scientific instruments into space for decades. These instruments look at every part of the electromagnetic-spectrum: gamma-rays, x-rays, ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, microwaves and radio waves; these instruments are sensitive enough to detect planets five thousand light-years away from Earth by measuring how much the radiation dims as the planet passes in front of the star that they are orbiting!
Now, alien species may have all sorts of advanced technology but is it likely that not a single piece of their technology will make the slightest ripple in the electromagnetic-spectrum when their craft visit the Earth? Is it likely that these alien craft are not detected by the radar used to track all the space-junk orbiting the Earth? Is it likely that no alien civilisation has ever broadcast a single radio-transmission, even as an accidental by-product of their technology, that could have been picked-up as they visited the Earth? Well, possibly…
…but then is it likely that these super-stealthy alien species are going to blunder right in front of a human witness in some way that the witness is left in no doubt that he has seen an alien craft?
The second video you posted featuring Neil Tyson seems to support exactly what I was saying in my previous post (#125) about the primary source of proof of alien craft visiting Earth not coming from eye-witnesses!
By: charliehunt - 18th June 2015 at 18:59
Geoff – not much point in pursuing this as as we just go round in circles.:)
By: 1batfastard - 18th June 2015 at 17:42
But what they most certainly are not are inter-galactic space vehicles.
Hi All,
Charlie,
Your doing it again ridiculing those who believe in the possibility they are, do you have any proof they are not NO! you don’t just like I don’t have proof they are or the possibility they are. Like I have said I have an open mind because in truth it cannot be proved one way or the other at the moment despite the apparent evidence as already mentioned. You ask why alien visitors would come so far to visit us ? well it’s simple if true they are doing exactly what we would do if we had the technology I should imagine exploring the cosmos and i’s planets only they have a technology to allow them to explore in person or at least have Robots/Humanoids whatever to actually interact with any environment just as in the future I am sure man will one day, for all I know could waiting for the culling season as we are a food source nothing more to them, the fact that we explore and investigate other planets would obviously lead one to the same conclusion about what they are doing here and as already been said not that this planet is special just one of many thousands but one that has an intelligent life form making strides towards outer space.
CD,
Just one point if I may you say we have had the equipment to detect them there is a slight floor to that theory as has been said by those who actively listen for any contact even Seth Shostak any alien civilisation may have developed a completely different form of communication and we have as much chance as understanding what a whale is talking about or words to that effect, we always think that all things are universal i.e. he laws of Physics/Life forms etc.etc. they could be on the moon shouting out but unless we can hear them they may as well be billions of light years away we wouldn’t detect them unless we develop similar equipment to them. As for what you said about scientists and equipment there are and they are though there has only been one signal that was detected many moons ago it’s called the wow signal :- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal Don’t forget that we are only in the learning to crawl stage of exploration off planet the universe is so vast and we are just a spec in it so you can imagine life could be blatting past all around and until we actually manage to explore further than the Voyager missions who have only recently just left our solar system they were launched in 1977 so as far as it goes we have crawled about 2mm..:D
Here are two videos buy Neil deGrasse Tyson on the subject.
Geoff.
By: Creaking Door - 16th June 2015 at 23:18
You cannot possibly know there is life…..and statistics are just that.
No, I can’t but since there are over 250 billion stars in our galaxy, the Milky Way, and at least 100 billion galaxies that are observable from Earth (orbit) with existing telescope technology you don’t think that the probability is strong that life could exist on just one other planet? And those are just the galaxies mankind can actually see!
By: charliehunt - 16th June 2015 at 19:22
Or accepting that we are alone. Both points of view are equally valid until proven otherwise.
True but the extract of my post you have quoted is meaningless without the rest of the post.
By: hampden98 - 16th June 2015 at 19:17
I thought it was because they wanted to have sex with people who they kidnap from remote areas.
Moggy
Depends if you consider an `anal probe` as sex I guess.
By: hampden98 - 16th June 2015 at 19:17
Surely the key point is, accepting the highly probable likelihood that we are not the only life forms in the universe
Or accepting that we are alone. Both points of view are equally valid until proven otherwise.
By: hampden98 - 16th June 2015 at 19:16
You cannot possibly know that…..and statistically you’re probably wrong!
You cannot possibly know there is life and statistics are just that.
By: charliehunt - 16th June 2015 at 15:58
You have the advantage of me – I didn’t know that robotic clones had “sex”! Who needs sex when procreation is in the lab?;)
By: Moggy C - 16th June 2015 at 15:53
…. why would any other life form with the advanced technology required to travel throufh light years of space bother with our planet.
I thought it was because they wanted to have sex with people who they kidnap from remote areas.
Moggy
By: charliehunt - 16th June 2015 at 05:55
Surely the key point is, accepting the highly probable likelihood that we are not the only life forms in the universe, why would any other life form with the advanced technology required to travel throufh light years of space bother with our planet. They might a visit out of curiosity and quickly move on.
They would have no reason to spend time here nor to make multiple visits over decades.
UFOs are exactly that. Objects which cannot be identified. But what they most certainly are not are inter-galactic space vehicles.
By: Creaking Door - 15th June 2015 at 21:32
Sorry to disappoint everyone but there is no other life in the Universe…
You cannot possibly know that…..and statistically you’re probably wrong!
By: hampden98 - 15th June 2015 at 19:09
When certain people see something they cannot explain rather than believe the logical, obvious or use common sense they fantasize about what they `hope` or `want` that
thing to be. Lets not assume because a person is intelligent, famous or credible that they do not fall into this category.
We ridicule, challenge, and deride politicians in almost every way except when dealing with a conspiracy when we suddenly believe everything they say, even when what they say is laughable. Should that politician be a second rate actor doubly so.
Just because we as mere mortals long for far off worlds full of mythical beings there is absolutely no evidence to suggest in any way, shape or form that any do exist. Meanwhile we destroy the only confirmed oasis of life that does exist. Cause extinction, destruction and death on a daily basis. Do you really think that if an alien looked down on us it would actually bother to pay us a visit, let alone, after many light years of highly precise space travel in a craft so advanced we probably wouldn’t understand what is was if it landed on us, unexpectedly crash in a remote area of America, near an airbase, full of said politicians, actors and banjo players. Probably the worst place for anyone to visit let alone an omnipotent space traveler.
Sorry to disappoint everyone but there is no other life in the Universe and until an Alien is seen down the Strand trying to double park it’s space cruiser I will consider the matter closed.
The rest of you can believe whatever you want to believe.
By: Creaking Door - 15th June 2015 at 17:25
I suppose it is very difficult, after you’ve invested a lot of time and effort (and money?) into a particular cause, and staked something of your reputation on it, to admit that what you believed in was utterly wrong…
…but then that is the danger of investing a belief in something with ‘evidence’ but not (nearly) conclusive evidence.
By: Beermat - 15th June 2015 at 15:57
I have been watching this with interest – I have something to add on the nature of belief and believers.
This chap I know used to go out with a bunch of mates and create crop circles in a farmer’s field. He and his mates used to drink in the pub that was often visited by believers in alien causes for the circles, thirsty after a hard day’s tramping around cornfields with energy-field detectors and divining rods. They would listen in quiet amusement to their conversations.
After a while this got boring, so they started owning up.. ‘Sorry to interrupt, but it was actually me and my mate John who made that one’… and they were accused by the visitors of making it up! So one day my acquaintance showed a group of American crop-circle-ologists a photo of him making a circle with a peg and a rope. One of them said ‘Yes, but that’s obviously staged’…
People will get ‘locked in’ to belief, I guess.
By: Creaking Door - 15th June 2015 at 11:08
What evidence do you want? When you say hard evidence what do you mean exactly?
To my mind you either believe in the possibility or don’t…..simple…
Except it isn’t simple; it isn’t just a question of either believing we are the only life in the universe or believing ‘thousands’ of alien craft have visited the Earth.
As I’ve already said, in an almost infinite universe I’m certain life exists on other planets but that does not mean that any unexplained phenomena is ‘evidence’ of aliens; most ‘UFO’ sightings, the Bermuda Triangle, crop-circles, mutilated cattle, Scientology or the Great Pyramids just don’t constitute convincing evidence as far as I am concerned.
As for what does constitute ‘hard’ evidence, well, that’s something else that isn’t simple.
One thing that I do think is unlikely is that the primary source of ‘hard’ evidence is going to be people seeing things with their own eyes; that’s going to sound illogical but let me try to explain. Firstly there are plenty of people who want there to be aliens. Secondly people can be mistaken. Thirdly, and most importantly, it is not demonstrable to other people; we must rely on witness testimony (and this is not a court of law).
And it is not as if mankind hasn’t had the tools to detect evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence for many decades and has been actively scanning the universe with them, not always for alien life directly maybe, but in a way that mankind would probably detect evidence of alien life if it was near enough to detect it.
I would expect this vast body of scientists and the vast array of instruments at their disposal to be the primary source of evidence of alien life visiting our solar system; and the evidence therefore will not be a blurry photograph or a witness statement but a set of very subtle and complex readings picked-up by several scientific instruments, operated by different agencies, civilian and government, simultaneously, in different countries…
…but then that would be very boring, and too much like hard work, for the average ufologist!
By: charliehunt - 15th June 2015 at 10:39
Geoff – my mind is quite clear on the subject. You just haven’t read carefully enough what I wrote.
Sign In
May 18, 2015 at 6:43 pm