July 7, 2004 at 4:49 pm
Hi all,
Just gone and booked my tailwheel course (YIPPEE!! Proper aeroplanes!), so now I’m looking for some suggestions on some reading material I can stick my head into in preparation. And of course, if anyone has any anecdotes / hints / tips / advice, I’d love to hear ’em! 😀
Thanks in advance….
Steve
By: Melvyn Hiscock - 9th July 2004 at 20:49
Andy from Beds plus Steve? Isn’t that slightly over two normal people in -um- weight? (And well under in ‘normal’) 😀
Pity I can’t be there to help make it four in Normals… and one in weight.
Thanks for the response Moggy. Where is your Suffolk to clouds trip report?
Cheers
Andy’s not that big and the only weight Patty is neutral due to being full of hot air (arf arf). I figured the three of us in a four-seater . . .
Melv
By: JDK - 9th July 2004 at 15:51
Andy from Beds plus Steve? Isn’t that slightly over two normal people in -um- weight? (And well under in ‘normal’) 😀
Pity I can’t be there to help make it four in Normals… and one in weight.
Thanks for the response Moggy. Where is your Suffolk to clouds trip report?
Cheers
By: Yak 11 Fan - 9th July 2004 at 13:13
😮 😀 😀
By: Melvyn Hiscock - 9th July 2004 at 12:59
As for flying the Big Red Beast, well if your offering it would be rude not to. 😀 😀
Just remember who rebuilt it . . .
Melv
By: Yak 11 Fan - 9th July 2004 at 11:37
Abso-bleedin-loutely but why wait? Get stuck in, it is all flying and the tailwheel will sharpen you up on the ground and make you concentrate more on approaches!
At the moment I am looking forward to converting onto the BRB (Big Red Beast). I suppose you’ll want a go in that too . . . .
Melv
I need to wait because I don’t own the aircraft, so need to hang on a bit until the owners says yes, although we have started to discuss it 😀
As for flying the Big Red Beast, well if your offering it would be rude not to. 😀 😀
By: Melvyn Hiscock - 9th July 2004 at 11:31
is that rent as in hire or rip apart?
K
Arf arf, Actually rent. This would have been G-OVFR, the very 172 that has Steph’s bum print on the seat. I normally fly two seaters (that few friends) but there was talk of a little trip out with Patty Stephenson, the well known American Spoonerism, and Andy From Beds, the well known Norfolk migrant.
Melv
By: Melvyn Hiscock - 9th July 2004 at 11:29
Don’t get me wrong, I am intending to fly other types and will hopefully be moving on to the Auster in another 10 / 15 hours or so, that really should sharpen me up, from there on, well I guess we will see what happens in the future, at the moment I’m just happy to be flying.
Abso-bleedin-loutely but why wait? Get stuck in, it is all flying and the tailwheel will sharpen you up on the ground and make you concentrate more on approaches!
At the moment I am looking forward to converting onto the BRB (Big Red Beast). I suppose you’ll want a go in that too . . . .
Melv
By: dodrums - 9th July 2004 at 10:11
very nearly had to rent a 172 today!
Melvyn
is that rent as in hire or rip apart?
K
By: Yak 11 Fan - 9th July 2004 at 09:54
Don’t get me wrong, I am intending to fly other types and will hopefully be moving on to the Auster in another 10 / 15 hours or so, that really should sharpen me up, from there on, well I guess we will see what happens in the future, at the moment I’m just happy to be flying.
By: Melvyn Hiscock - 9th July 2004 at 09:50
Part of my reason for not learning to fly 10 years ago was that in my youthful state I looked at the Cessna / Piper range and thought ‘I don’t want to fly one of those!!’ and wanted to fly something more interesting!!!
I was lucky as I started learning at Old Sarum and had a couple of trips in a 150 but then, after a break of about two years, I started again at Thruxton on the Rollason Condor. I was determined not to become a one-type pilot as I wanted to fly aeroplanes not just one type so I also flew the DR400, T67 and Cherokee 180. Doing my licence on a tailwheel was the most sensible thing I did. The Condor was great for bimbling around but it didn’t really have enough instruments to make that part challenging!
Great little aeroplane though.
Since then I have flown a wide variety of types and very nearly had to rent a 172 today!
Melvyn
By: Yak 11 Fan - 9th July 2004 at 09:41
I currently fly a 180hp 172 having trained on a 150hp thing, the extra hp makes a huge amount of difference to the general performance of the aircraft.
Part of my reason for not learning to fly 10 years ago was that in my youthful state I looked at the Cessna / Piper range and thought ‘I don’t want to fly one of those!!’ and wanted to fly something more interesting!!!
Looking back now I can see how stupid I was and how much I have missed out on, however I am attempting to make up for it now by flying at every opportunity, now where did i put that bag of extra special sunshine that I’d been saving, I could just do with it now!!
By: Melvyn Hiscock - 9th July 2004 at 09:34
Not really. Very much a part of the 1950’s American attempt to make flying as little like flying and as much like driving a car as possible. Nothing wrong with them, they are just a tool for travelling from A to B
Moggy
Agreed, if they were as bad as some people say then they would not have made aout 36,000 of the various versions. I also agree with YAK11 that a 172 with a decent engine is a good thing. Alan House has a Hawk XP which he flew over from the US. I flew that back from Hasselt in Belgium a few years back after we had been looking at Saab Safir parts (now, the Safir is a NICE aeroplane).
Small engined 172s, however, are not my tasse de the. (Final bit there just for Steph.)
Melv
By: Moggy C - 9th July 2004 at 09:25
I too have had a look at a rather stripped down Piper Pacer fuselage recently, thankfully its well underway to being straight again and restored to full health.
🙂 🙂 🙂
Moggy
By: Moggy C - 9th July 2004 at 09:25
Kylie’s the same . . .
Where and when did you do your rating? I’d be interested to know.
I did it at Coventry on the Texas Taildragger G-HART when I was working for Atlantique 1997 / 8
That sounds like it had had a late night out in the fleshpots of Clacton!
Are there any?
Don’t they resemble an aeroplane?
Not really. Very much a part of the 1950’s American attempt to make flying as little like flying and as much like driving a car as possible. Nothing wrong with them, they are just a tool for travelling from A to B
Moggy
By: Yak 11 Fan - 9th July 2004 at 09:14
The 172 is a lovely aeroplane with the right engine!!!!
Good luck on the course Steve, any idea who your instructor will be?
I too have had a look at a rather stripped down Piper Pacer fuselage recently, thankfully its well underway to being straight again and restored to full health.
By: Melvyn Hiscock - 9th July 2004 at 09:07
Word of caution.
Ring in advance.
Kylie’s the same . . .
Last year I needed the “Instructor two-yearly hour” and decided a bimble around the Clacton circuit in the Cub sounded just the ticket.
Where and when did you do your rating? I’d be interested to know.
Rang in the morning and confirmed.
Arrived at 2pm and the Cub had gone ‘out of hours’.
That sounds like it had had a late night out in the fleshpots of Clacton!
Spent 60-something minutes of tedium in a 172 instead 🙁
Moggy
Don’t they resemble an aeroplane?
By: Moggy C - 9th July 2004 at 07:10
The US Short Wing Piper Club is the best.
There was a UK Vintage Piper Aeroplane Club but it seemed to undergo some sort of legally inspired trauma a couple of years back and I’ve lost track of it.
Friend of mine in France has had a lovely conversion done giving a ‘glass’ roof. Transforms the aircraft.
November Echo.? Complete, awaiting paperwork 😡
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!
Moggy
By: JDK - 9th July 2004 at 04:50
Saw a TriPacer in smaller bits than yours in a garage here this Arvo, here in TO, Moggy. Any good Piper web places you can point the owner to?
By: Arabella-Cox - 8th July 2004 at 23:55
Hmm, I’ll bear that in mind, thanks. 🙂
Any news on when the Colt’s back in the air? You must be crawling up the walls by now mate.
By: Moggy C - 8th July 2004 at 23:50
Word of caution.
Ring in advance.
Last year I needed the “Instructor two-yearly hour” and decided a bimble around the Clacton circuit in the Cub sounded just the ticket.
Rang in the morning and confirmed.
Arrived at 2pm and the Cub had gone ‘out of hours’.
Spent 60-something minutes of tedium in a 172 instead 🙁
Moggy