dark light

RedBull Stratos. edge of space para jump

Can some one do me the honours of digging up the link. aint got a clue how to do it but its something well worth sharing as its being done today by all accounts 😮

RedBull Stratos

…..

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 18th October 2012 at 08:47

That’s a good recollection!!:)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 17th October 2012 at 21:35

Which is what I posted in #74…..:p

😮

Back in my army days we would take turns at the shooting range, those shooting, and those in the trench by the targets, who would indicate where the bullet struck. You could clearly hear the sonic booms of the bullets overhead. Not to mention the actual skirmishes in the operational area. The difference between a subsonic and supersonic round is unmistakable.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 17th October 2012 at 11:24

Yes the bullet was always a good ilustration. I remember it being used in the early days of unrestricted “booms” to explain how the intensity and the timing of the two booms varied depending on height, angle of dive or level flight, ambient atmospheric conditions and speed.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

870

Send private message

By: JT442 - 17th October 2012 at 11:13

I like this image of shockwave formation… in this case a bullet.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/06/weird-world-of-fluids/

You’d only hear the ‘boom’ as the shockwave passed over you (in this case, some time after the bullet itself passes – the shockwaves being the black lines in the form of a bow wave and smaller shocks along the bullet length.)

Now turn the picture through 90 degrees so the bullet (Baumgartner) is heading downwards… At what point will the shockwave pass over you to enable a ‘boom’ to be heard…

Yes, the air is so thin at the point of sound breakage in Baumgardner’s case, that the shockwave would be greatly reduced. In theory, if you were on a platform and he passed you by whilst doing the speed of sound at 80,000 ft you’d hear it. You’d also have breathing difficulties, exploding eyeballs and a REALLY tall platform!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 17th October 2012 at 09:44

Charlie, Beat you by 2,…..72.;) AND I didn’t need to Google or WikipediA either:p

Jim.

Lincoln .7

Well….I don’t think you actually EXPLAINED why….!;):):dev2:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 17th October 2012 at 09:40

Which is what I posted in #74…..:p

Charlie, Beat you by 2,…..72.;) AND I didn’t need to Google or WikipediA either:p

Jim.

Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

722

Send private message

By: Tony at BH - 17th October 2012 at 09:05

Spike Milligan could have answered that, once upon a time:) he used to talk to them.!!!

Jim.
Lincoln .7

I thought that was Clint Eastwood?

Tony

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 17th October 2012 at 08:29

Yer all go to this page : http://www.redbullstratos.com/ there is a link to the speed of sound explained. The speed of sound varies as a function of the absolute temperature. However since the air up there is so thin it will hardly have an effect.

Which is what I posted in #74…..:p

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 16th October 2012 at 23:22

Yer all go to this page : http://www.redbullstratos.com/ there is a link to the speed of sound explained. The speed of sound varies as a function of the absolute temperature. However since the air up there is so thin it will hardly have an effect.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 16th October 2012 at 15:13

Could have a point there Charlie, Is it in Google or WikipediA?. 😉
Jim.
Lincoln.7

I don’t know..go on have a look, I shan’t tell!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 16th October 2012 at 15:10

If a tree falls in the forest and no-one is there, did it make a noise? :diablo:

Spike Milligan could have answered that, once upon a time:) he used to talk to them.!!!

Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 16th October 2012 at 15:08

Could have a point there Charlie, Is it in Google or WikipediA?. 😉
Jim.
Lincoln.7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 16th October 2012 at 10:46

Surely any object moving faster than the speed of sound will produce a shockwave. Is the difference here that the air was so thin at the point the wave was produced so that little or any of it would have reached the surface or have been audible?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 16th October 2012 at 10:22

If a tree falls in the forest and no-one is there, did it make a noise? :diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 16th October 2012 at 10:00

I think they just went by the fact that as he exceeded the speed of sound and not having the same makeup as an aircrat that would have made a bang, my opinion is no, there would have been no bang.
But that’s just my opinion,

Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

722

Send private message

By: Tony at BH - 16th October 2012 at 09:51

One question I have about this jump. I haven’t heard anyone mention nor seen anything on this thread (so it may be a stupid question but I have to ask it).

As he went through the sound barrier, did he make a sonic bang?

Tony.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 16th October 2012 at 09:43

I had a PM from a member stating some failed because they were re packed when they had been wet or damp, before they were dried out completely.
True?.

Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 16th October 2012 at 08:57

Sadly, incorrect chute deployment or malfunction has killed numbers of jumpers post-war, as well.:(

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 16th October 2012 at 08:46

That young lads ordeal got me thinking, Why did his chutes not deploy correctly, and I also got to thinking just how many similar occasions like this happened during the War?.

It may be an old wives tale, but years ago, I seem to remember being told, that the unfortunate person, who’s chute failed to open, would be dead before they hit the ground, heart attack or something like that.
Is it the packing of the chute that was the fault, or some other reason, anyone know?, when things like this happen.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 15th October 2012 at 22:18

I was just about to mention that. Ejecting from a stricken space vehicle.

1 4 5
Sign in to post a reply