dark light

Restorations why so long?

Now not trying to get your goat some very sensative folks on here!:p

Why do restorations take so long to do?

Reading Dec 2010 Flypast of several aircraft FW-190 & spitfire SL633, etc These taking several years to re build why is it cost? or too many jobs on at the same time? Man power?

I appreciate the job needs to be done with precision & skill but some taking 8 years seems a very long time don’t you think?, The likes of the mighty B-17 etc fair enough plenty more rivets than the fighters

Take the Spitfire restored here in the uk how long would it take to re build this hands on every day 2-3 men? Spares must be a good few here in the uk are all panels made from scratch or are some “on the shelf” so to say?

I know the engines and hydraulics need to be re built and tested as i build engines i know of time scales not had the pleasure of a merlin yet!, Just interested to see why it takes so long.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,768

Send private message

By: Mark V - 9th November 2010 at 22:58

What about the place in Jersey that did them?

They only sell parts these days.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 9th November 2010 at 22:26

When I was out at Camarillo earlier this year one of the CAF guys working on Dave Prices old Mk14 said to me “What the **** were you guys thinking when you built these???”

I just smiled 🙂

I also reminded them it ran fine when I last worked on it…. I was a bit thinner then….

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v317/ZRX61/Warbirds/Mk14.jpg

My standard answer to Americans asking why the prop has “so many blades” was “because our aircraft are way more powerful than yours”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

561

Send private message

By: mackerel - 9th November 2010 at 22:15

Like it says “ideal world” ;)…. Real world is more 😡 than 🙂 There’s no way a shop can stay busy on just one project.

Have to say I prefer the split upper cowls like the P51 over the Spit one piece, those are absolute ******s when they arrive from IOW & need *a bit* of fetting to fit. At least with a P51 one person can easily pull or install all the cowls 🙂

Well thats why you are an airframe fitter , most spit bits require a bit of fettling to get that fit!!. All bits for spits are pretty much bespoke cos they are all different in some way!!!

Steve

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 9th November 2010 at 21:11

What about the place in Jersey that did them?

also Scottish Aviation? what was the deal there?

How about John Sandbergs outfit, did that business keep going? Altho I’ve heard quite a few people refer to those engines as “sandgrenades”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,023

Send private message

By: Yak 11 Fan - 9th November 2010 at 20:25

In the UK Maurice Hammond does his own.

Not just his own, he has rebuilt a number for other operators too.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 9th November 2010 at 17:58

If any shop quoted that scenario they’d be out of business PDQ. It all goes to hell with that 10%/90% deal.

You have to come up with something between the previously mentioned “first estimate” & something that could be possible…:D

That will explain why builders are so unpopular round here!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 9th November 2010 at 17:12

Don’t forget the 3x time 2x cost factor 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

463

Send private message

By: piston power! - 9th November 2010 at 17:07

Thanks for those links 6-9 months for the Griffon.!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 9th November 2010 at 16:49

Well the one we mostly deal with is Mike Nixons Vintage V12’s who are just up the hill from me:
http://www.vintagev12s.com/about.htm

Then Ricky Shanholzter (sp?) has a shop in Tx which is what became of Dave Zeushels business. Mike also worked for Zeushel back in the day.

Dave was into drag racing:
http://forum.competitionplus.com/archive/index.php/t-6518.html

In the UK Maurice Hammond does his own, Roush does some in the US & also makes parts (pistons/rings etc, which are a work of art). Then there is Jack Hovey’s place up in Ione Ca.

There are others. Not sure what became of Dwight Thorns outfit after he passed.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

463

Send private message

By: piston power! - 9th November 2010 at 16:28

Are you asking about one particular Merlin or who still makes parts and/or overhauls them today?

On the topic of making new Merlins, this would help:
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/nextengines-3d-scanner/944641/

Yes who overhauls them today any links you may have will be great. Thanks pp.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 9th November 2010 at 16:21

Are you asking about one particular Merlin or who still makes parts and/or overhauls them today?

On the topic of making new Merlins, this would help:
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/nextengines-3d-scanner/944641/

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

463

Send private message

By: piston power! - 9th November 2010 at 15:43

Who is the engine builders of the Merlin?

What is there shelf life before one is to be stripped and new seals fitted etc?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,455

Send private message

By: merlin70 - 9th November 2010 at 15:15

Hi Bruce.

That was my point really. Restorations need to have recently serviced parts which goes away from the notion of bulk manufacture and storage.

Even HFL have disposed of their huge spares store. That may have been for other reasons though.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,370

Send private message

By: Bruce - 9th November 2010 at 14:33

The Spit XVIII was not up to modern standards; the engine had sat around uninhibited for years, the prop was way out of check and so on. The aircraft itself had been in a box for ten years, so needed a good bit of work.

What was done to it was what I reckoned it needed, both when I put it in the box back in 1992, and when I took it out of the box (both times with others!!) in about 2004/5.

Bruce

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,455

Send private message

By: merlin70 - 9th November 2010 at 14:29

Crated a/c.

Several references have been made to bulk manufacture and stock piling of parts. I frequently think of the a/c restored to airworthy condition and then crated. Foremost of these being the Doug Arnold collection.

The Spit XVIII was purchased, removed from its crate, stripped down and completely rebuilt by TFC for the new owner. The P47 is also going through this process.

There are several other a/c that rest in crates having been placed there after a successful restoration and flight.

These a/c with original/restored parts and new built parts seem not to be able to cope with the passage of time. Might this be a good reason for historic a/c restorers to make the parts to order such that they are fully serviceable when needed for installation?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 9th November 2010 at 02:16

No denying that, but P51’s are a piece of cake (sorry) to work on compared to Spits.. or am I merely thinking that because I’ve worked on a lot more P51’s (about 20) than Spits (3) since I left Blighty?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,288

Send private message

By: QldSpitty - 9th November 2010 at 02:05

Boy, you sure got that right LOL!!! Only the British would invent the slotted fastener hole so parts could be moved for/aft on one part with a left/right slot on the other part to provide a reasonable chance of the bolt dropping into the hole…

Which is probably what ultimately lead to the invention of the Irwin uni-bit

Yes but they do make some of the most beautiful planes in the world 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 9th November 2010 at 01:39

Boy, you sure got that right LOL!!! Only the British would invent the slotted fastener hole so parts could be moved for/aft on one part with a left/right slot on the other part to provide a reasonable chance of the bolt dropping into the hole…

Which is probably what ultimately lead to the invention of the Irwin uni-bit 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 9th November 2010 at 01:29

Have to say I prefer the split upper cowls like the P51 over the Spit one piece, those are absolute ******s when they arrive from IOW & need *a bit* of fetting to fit.

My understanding of the ‘hand-fitting’ requirements of the Spitfire cowls (I recall overhearing some *remarks* at DX when a Spitfire was getting new cowlings) inspired this:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v708/JDK2/motivator844735868a332e7b48bb61c80f1b134ef4030f53.jpg

Should you wish to develop your own*, the website’s here: http://bighugelabs.com/motivator.php

Just a bit of fun. 😉

(*Poster. Spitfires cost a bit more.)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,288

Send private message

By: QldSpitty - 9th November 2010 at 01:26

Have to say I prefer the split upper cowls like the P51 over the Spit one piece, those are absolute ******s when they arrive from IOW & need *a bit* of fetting to fit. At least with a P51 one person can easily pull or install all the cowls

Horses for courses here..Some like the beauty of the Spitfire…some like the brute power and lines of the P51.Plus they are pretty much opposite in terms of design and production.The RAAF had a choice to produce either after the war and went with the P51 (CAC) due to ease and maintenance.

1 2 3 4
Sign in to post a reply