By: Hominghead - 30th January 2006 at 16:28
XD Never thought we have such a stuff :dev2:
Our army may carry about sides of land but in inner theres full chaos!
Belive me,its a chaos.
/
😀
/
By: phrozenflame - 22nd January 2006 at 07:55
No wonder they had Tesla Tanks in all C&C games 😀
I always thought that was 100% fiction…but it isnt.
By: sferrin - 20th January 2006 at 23:43
Claoking devices and Death Rays. Up next, Photon Torpedos.
By: Blackcat - 20th January 2006 at 16:20
here is something that might interes u …
Russia has an amazing Death Ray Gun…
Shielding is ineffective. The scalar pulse (or continuous wave) can go anywhere gravity can go. It penetrates the steel hull of tanks and armored vehicles. It penetrates underground shelters and bunkers. It penetrates pillboxes and fortifications. Foxholes are no protection. Just shoot through the earth into them. There is no longer any place to hide.
Bodies did not decay even in 30 days…
The Soviets are employing just such a scalar “death ray” weapon in Afghanistan, apparently in the noses of some of their HIND helicopters. These choppers usually fire gas rockets to camouflage the testing of the tactical scalar death ray. For example, they may fire rockets filled with nerve gas, and some persons will die convulsively from the chemical. Those hit by the scalar EM weapon, however, have a most peculiar death mode.
Death comes-instantly and totally. There is no convulsion, no response. The entire nervous system is destroyed instantly. Every living cell in the body is killed instantly, including all bacteria, germs, etc. A body hit with this thing falls like a limp rag and lies where it falls. It doesn’t decay in even 30-45 days. In a macabre fashion, it’s been reduced to something like food irradiated with nuclear radiation; everything is killed, so the material is preserved for an extended period before any decay can set in.
Western military authorities have speculated that this strange death is due to some sort of eery new gas. However, even with the most virulent gas, some seconds are required for a body to die. And while it’s dying it goes into convulsions. Violent convulsions. This eery, instant death that leaves a non-decaying corpse is not due to a gas. This is the signature of a high-powered pulse kill using a scalar EM weapon. The associated gas rockets are the disguise used to fool our intelligence analysts. They’re just part of the Soviet deception plan.
ADDITIONAL NOTES AND REFERENCES – For details of the mysterious, instant deaths in Afghanistan, see Yossef Bodansky, “Soviets testing chemical agents in Afghanistan,” Jane’s Defence Weekly, 1(13), Apr. 7, 1984, p. 508
Armor has no effect…
Such weapons are also effective against armored vehicles, for example. They can be carried by personnel, mounted on vehicles, mounted in helicopters, etc. They are truly all-purpose weapons.
An infantryman with a bazooka-sized scalar EM pulse weapon can easily knock out a tank with one shot. The armor has no effect; scalar EM goes right through conductive shielding and Faraday cages. And with the same weapon he can knock out another tank, and another, and another…
More frightening than the mind of Man has ever imagined…
Brezhnev’s unheeded 1975 characterization of these weapons as “more frightening than the mind of ran has ever imagined” has very real justification. There is now a “balance of terror” loose in the world that makes the old MADmen’s MAD concept look like a sunny day in Hawaii.
“Each side secretly develops new means of warfare in order to employ them unexpectedly. History knows many examples how the employment of a new weapon initially gave considerable success because the enemy, caught unawares and not knowing the combat capabilities of this weapon, was for some time incapable of effective counteraction” – V. Yo. Savkin, The Basic Principles of Operational Art and Tactics, Moscow, 1972.
RUSSIA’S DEATH RAY WEAPON…
The Soviet scientific attention to Tesla’ a last living assistant has even more ominous implications when one realizes that the U.S.S.R. is using nuclear fusion energy research in the creation of their horrible new PARTICLE BEAM DEATH RAY WEAPON. General George Keegan, retired Air Force Chief of Intelligence, has devoted great energy to warning the American people about the immense danger of the Soviet particle beam weapon. Keegan’s warnings met strong objections from the Rockefeller-CFR political flunkies who control the Pentagon.
A detailed and technical account of the Soviet’s near perfection of their particle bean DEATH RAY Weapon (which confirms General Keegan’s warning) appeared in the May 2, 1977 issue of AVIATION VIE & SPACE TECHNOLOGY. The Soviet particle beam weapon will be able to destroy U.S. intercontinental ballistic missiles and thus, NEUTRALIZE MOST US STRATEGIC WEAPONS.
The book, LIGHTNING IN HIS HAND. THE LIFE STORY OF NIKOLA TESLA by Ines Hunt and Wanetta V. Draper (Omni Publications), devotes an entire chapter to Tesla’s death ray design. The description of Tesla’s death ray is very similar to the description of the Soviet particle beam weapon. Hunt and Draper reported that news of Tesla’s death ray appeared in a Colorado Springs paper on May 30, 1924. “The news story told of the invention of an invisible ray, developed by Tesla, which was capable of stopping airplanes in mid flight, an invention which had come about through improvements on Tesla’s Colorado Springs discoveries.”
The book stated that in 1934, an Associated Press report quoted Tesla as “saying that his ray was based on an entirely new principle of physics. He … claimed that his bean could destroy 10,000 planes at a distance of two hundred and fifty miles. … The beam was only one one-hundred-millionth centimeter.” Tesla stated that his bean could create, “a veritable Chinese wall around the country, and could defend the United States against all foes.” “His beam,” he claimed, “could melt any engine, whether driven by diesel or gasoline or oil, and THERE WAS NO POSSIBLE DEFENSE AGAINST IT.”
Hunt and Draper continued, “The ray was described as the most important of all Tesla’s inventions so far. It was said that IT COULD SEND CONSECRATED BEAMS OF PARTICLES THROUGH FREE AIR, and could cause armies of millions to drop dead in their tracks. …The Tesla ray involved four new inventions: one, comprising an apparatus for producing rays and other manifestations of energy in free air, eliminating the high vacuum necessary for producing such rays and beans; the second, a method for producing great electrical forces and the third, a plan for amplifying this process in the second invention; and the fourth, a new method of producing a tremendous repelling force. … The voltages to be employed were fifty million volts, catapulted for destruction. The entire process was labeled, by Tesla, his ‘TELEFORCE’.”
Additional evidence that the Soviets are using the scientific techniques of Nikola Tesla in their weather warfare against America appeared in a press report in the September 23, 1977 WASHINGTON POST. The newspaper reported that “a strange, star-like ball of light was sighted over Petrozavodsk in Soviet Karelia, spreading over it like a jelly fish and showering down shafts of light.” A number of Russians witnessed the event, which was reported by the Soviet news agency Tass. A similar phenomenon was seen over neighboring Finland.
Witnesses in Helsinki stated that a strange and unusual “ball of fire was visible for about four minutes.”
An article in the JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RERSEARCH by Dr. B.N. Turuan stated that U.S. military intelligence satellites have also reported sighting what are apparently monster lightning bolts over the U.S.S.R. Dr. Thurman revealed that the “superbolts” were thousands of times more powerful than any previously sighted there.
According to Dr. Turuan, these “superbolts” have electrical power to about 10 TRILLION WATTS and total energies of more than a billion joules. Prior to the new Soviet sightings, the most powerful lightning bolts ever recorded were 10 billion watts and contained total energies of one million joules.
Anyone familiar with Nikola Tesla’s numerous experiments (especially those in Colorado Springs) would recognize that the strange Soviet super lightning bolts are probably the direct result of Russia’s use of the fantastically high power Tesla-style weather warfare attacks, nuclear fusion development, and the related particle beam death ray development. Tesla personally created lightning bolts about 1735 feet long, about 77 years ago.
The article in the June, 1976 issue of RADIO ELECTRONIC MAGAZINE described current US experimentation in creating gigantic Tesla-style man-made lightning and ball lightning (in the search for a fusion energy solution). However, the U.S. experiment is relatively tiny, compared to the massive Soviet efforts.
By: sferrin - 16th January 2006 at 07:28
I know.
It is a dual use technology. For targets it can’t shoot down/destroy, its can render disabled by damaging seekers or blinding pilots/crew/operator.
Right, but I wasn’t trying to determine the power of the RUSSIAN system nor was I suggesting it was a “dazzler”. I was speaking strictly of the Bradley-mounted system.
By: Arabella-Cox - 16th January 2006 at 07:18
The pictures of the wing getting burned off were from the Russian system not the Bradley.
I know.
It is a dual use technology. For targets it can’t shoot down/destroy, its can render disabled by damaging seekers or blinding pilots/crew/operator.
By: sferrin - 16th January 2006 at 06:26
A laser powerful enough to start a fire on a model aircraft from 500m is a dazzler at 10km… Without knowing what range the model aircraft lost its wing how can you determine power? Structurally speaking burning a model planes wing is not the same as burning a real aircrafts wing. The only reliable thing either of these systems are capable of is as a dazzler/EO seeker damager type roles.
The pictures of the wing getting burned off were from the Russian system not the Bradley.
By: Arabella-Cox - 16th January 2006 at 03:54
IIRC the one on the Bradley was more of a “dazzler” and might have had the power to damage optical sensors but I don’t remember it having the kind of power to damage an airframe.
A laser powerful enough to start a fire on a model aircraft from 500m is a dazzler at 10km… Without knowing what range the model aircraft lost its wing how can you determine power? Structurally speaking burning a model planes wing is not the same as burning a real aircrafts wing. The only reliable thing either of these systems are capable of is as a dazzler/EO seeker damager type roles.
By: sferrin - 16th January 2006 at 02:50
I saw the pictures above, including the “shot down model plane” in an article in the German Magazine Military Technology about 1993 or so. Can’t remember the exact details, but remember that they compared it to a similar system mounted on a Bradley that was used for tests during DS.
Hmm. IIRC the one on the Bradley was more of a “dazzler” and might have had the power to damage optical sensors but I don’t remember it having the kind of power to damage an airframe. I’ll admit thought my knowledge of it consists of a recollection of a picture in Janes’s Defense Weekly and a small blurb about testing. Military Technology is top notch IMHO and although I haven’t read it in about fifteen years I still have all my issues from ’84 – ’89 or so.
By: Arabella-Cox - 16th January 2006 at 02:29
Do you have any sources on that?
I saw the pictures above, including the “shot down model plane” in an article in the German Magazine Military Technology about 1993 or so. Can’t remember the exact details, but remember that they compared it to a similar system mounted on a Bradley that was used for tests during DS.
By: sferrin - 16th January 2006 at 02:02
That system is quite old. A contemporary US system went to war in 1991 in DS for experimental purposes.
Do you have any sources on that?
By: Arabella-Cox - 16th January 2006 at 01:00
I agree, this is good news if the picture is indeed recent.
That system is quite old. A contemporary US system went to war in 1991 in DS for experimental purposes.
By: ink - 16th January 2006 at 00:06
It seems like the best Anti Aircraft/Missile defence ever!
Unless its raining, snowing or foggy or something… :diablo:
By: Petros - 14th January 2006 at 16:30
Any info about it’s effective range, Power and the power/shots autonomy?
It seems like the best Anti Aircraft/Missile defence ever!
By: Kusch - 7th January 2006 at 17:42
Dont forget ask about the folder.
125190,
Российская Федерация, г. Москва,
Ленинградский проспект, дом 80, корпус 16;
Телефон
(495)158-57-32
:diablo:
By: sferrin - 7th January 2006 at 17:19
Here’s another one from back in the day (don’t know when the Russian one is from)
By: VIRAGE - 7th January 2006 at 16:41
I wonder what the traget size is on that picture.. Looks like a small RC plane.
I agree, this is good news if the picture is indeed recent.
By: Arabella-Cox - 7th January 2006 at 14:30
Not bad. THELski 😉 Seriously, it’s about time Russian laser research got back on its feet, they used to be one of the leading countries in this field.
Sign In
January 7, 2006 at 2:04 pm
