dark light

Russian Space and Missiles thread #5

continued from
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=93561

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htada/articles/20120501.aspx

Russia Steps Back
May 1, 2012: Despite having bought and put into service five S-400 (SA-21) anti-aircraft battalions during the last few years, the Russian Defense Ministry has placed a large (quantity unspecified) order for the older S-300V (SA-12) system. This seems to indicate that the S-400 is having problems (it has certainly encountered many delays). The S-500, while still in development, has also had several embarrassing delays announced.

The original S-300 was known to NATO, during the Cold War, as the SA-10. This system entered service in the late 1970s and was upgraded several times since then. One major upgrade came to be called the SA-12 and it entered service in the late 1980s. Finally, there was the SA-21, which was so different from the original S-300 that it was given a new name by the Russians: the S-400. These systems began entering service, slowly, in 2007.

Russia has already deployed S-400 battalions near Kaliningrad, Moscow and the Far East. Russia has 160 older S-300 battalions, most of them the SA-10 model. A third of the existing S-300 battalions are not in service (and are supposed to be in storage, just in case). Each S-300 battalion had a long-range search radar to detect targets and six launcher vehicles (each carrying four or two missiles). Each of the new S-400 battalion has eight launchers, each with two missiles plus a control center and radar.

The S-300V/SA-12 missiles had a range of 75 kilometers and were considered somewhat similar to the American Patriot systems. Later models of the S-300V had some capability to shoot down short range ballistic missiles. The SA-12 missiles were carried in canisters (either four or two per launcher vehicle). Each launcher vehicle also contained a guidance radar.

The S-400 claims to be superior to the U.S. Patriot and is expensive. Russia is now offering to export the S-400, despite all the advanced technology in it. The S-400 missiles weigh 1.8 tons each, are 8.4 meters (26 feet) long, and about 50cm (20 inches) in diameter. The missiles have a range of some 400 kilometers and can hit targets as high as 100,000 feet. The missile has a 145.5 kg (320 pound) warhead. The target acquisition radar has a range of 700 kilometers.

The S-400 has over five times the range of the U.S. Patriot, weighs twice as much, and claims the ability to detect stealthy aircraft. The S-400 also has an anti-missile capability, which is limited to shorter range (under 3,500 kilometers) ballistic missiles. That would mean a warhead coming in at about 5,000 meters a second (the longer the range of a ballistic missile, the higher its re-entry speed).

The S-400 system actually has two types of missiles, one of them being smaller with a shorter range (120 kilometers). These are deployed four to a launcher, like all other S-300 systems. The S-400 has no combat experience but U.S. intelligence believes that the tests these systems have undergone indicate it is a capable air defense weapon. Just how capable won’t be known until it actually gets used in combat. None of the S-300 series systems have any combat experience either but some models have performed well in tests.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,823

Send private message

By: djcross - 30th October 2019 at 11:52

Russia prepares to conduct at least five test launches of new Sarmat missile in the next year.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/10/30/russia-prepares-satan-2-ballistic-missile-tests-a67967

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 24th March 2019 at 04:34

Autonomy, Machine Learning and Nukes. Russian perspective

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1FDWnzXgAEmptf.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1FDOQPWoAAx0xw.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1FDOQBWsAA1-Wc.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1FDRbxXQAEmkQ-.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1FDRbFWwAAjmYf.jpg

https://twitter.com/KomissarWhipla/status/1103737941749317632

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5

Send private message

By: Objekt - 28th January 2019 at 18:26

Operational SAM destroyed was Pantsir.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,665

Send private message

By: Levsha - 21st January 2019 at 19:43

What is the point of taking delivery of an air defence system when it seems to be out of action a lot of the time.
Unless of course, the pantsir system was inoperative only because it had been so successful in the previous hours that it had already completely used up all its ammunition and missiles shooting down Israeli targets?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,195

Send private message

By: TR1 - 21st January 2019 at 18:31

Yes, they again destroyed a Pantsir which was…..not firing as its radar was folded down lol.

https://pp.userapi.com/c852216/v852216283/9e4b1/b50wf3G4nfg.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7

Send private message

By: bandit6 - 21st January 2019 at 12:04

The pantsir and buk air defence systems got destroyed by the Israeli airforce in Syria while trying to repel an attack. Just a matter of time before the s-300 gets destroyed too.

http://alert5.com/2019/01/21/israel-releases-video-of-dramatic-air-strike-on-two-syrian-sam-systems-first-one-was-firing-2-missiles/

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 13th January 2019 at 05:55

Paul nice effort and you have written multiple articles so I need some time to go through it and give reviews.

I will share this with other board for a broader view and reviews

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

367

Send private message

By: panzerfeist1 - 7th January 2019 at 00:50

https://qr.ae/TUnKzZ Analysis on S-400 system and THAADs

https://qr.ae/TUnKzV Analysis on S-400 system and S-500.

I might have that cancerous KGB fanboyism for anyone that looks at the answers I post on that website but besides that. For the 1st answer link is my RCS tracking a little off on the S-400 system’s estimates? 2nd answer link is there any power estimates for the S-500 Yenisei radar? If anyone has the time give me a review.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

547

Send private message

By: St. John - 3rd January 2019 at 10:40

Is Avangard actually a powered glider, or just a glider?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 3rd January 2019 at 09:35

A Brief write up on Avangard and HGV Program

https://austinstalk.blogspot.com/2018/12/hypersonic-glide-vehical.html

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,325

Send private message

By: paralay - 31st December 2018 at 13:32

400km range from a Redut system? Can anyone explain?

Probably such a range “Polyment – Redut” will be implemented on the nuclear cruiser 1144 and the cruiser “Leader”

[ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:t1634525-main.jpg?nocache=305590.jpg Views:t1 Size:t38.1 KB ID:t3845085″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3845085″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”1634525-main.jpg?nocache=305590.jpg”}[/ATTACH][ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tBWgyBGx.jpg Views:t1 Size:t1.14 MB ID:t3845088″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3845088″,”data-size”:”custom”,”height”:”611″,”title”:”BWgyBGx.jpg”,”width”:”815″}[/ATTACH]

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

547

Send private message

By: St. John - 30th December 2018 at 18:41

^KM-SAM in video apparently.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KM-SAM

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

547

Send private message

By: St. John - 30th December 2018 at 16:14

Anyone notice the lack of front stabilisers on these missiles vs 9M96E2?

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”fa2c36ad75d93326fde8c6796a9e4fad.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3844984}[/ATTACH]

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

547

Send private message

By: St. John - 4th December 2018 at 18:32

400km range from a Redut system? Can anyone explain?

Russia’s Poliment-Redut Air Defense System to Fire Long Range Antiaircraft Missiles

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

547

Send private message

By: St. John - 3rd October 2018 at 08:42

Okay, thanks. What about the first one shown in the video?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

136

Send private message

By: xena - 3rd October 2018 at 04:52

I am not sure. There are rumors of a new anti satellite weapon. May be this is it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

547

Send private message

By: St. John - 2nd October 2018 at 09:26

You sure? It looks different. The rear sits back further than the rear of the wing roots and it lacks fins.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c4/2018_Moscow_Victory_Day_Parade_66.jpg/1200px-2018_Moscow_Victory_Day_Parade_66.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

136

Send private message

By: xena - 2nd October 2018 at 03:30

This is the air to surface missile Kinzhal.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

547

Send private message

By: St. John - 1st October 2018 at 16:06

What is the missile at the start of the video?

What is this missile?
https://pp.userapi.com/c847123/v847123716/f8d7f/2p_FlvArEi8.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,147

Send private message

By: Nicolas10 - 17th December 2017 at 23:51

What happens after the end of the 21st century though?

1 2 3 17
Sign in to post a reply