dark light

  • snafu

School kids smoking – again?

7 March 2014 Last updated at 13:21

Peterborough referral unit allows pupils to smoke

The head teacher of a school for children with behavioural issues has defended her decision to permit pupils to smoke.
Students aged 14 to 16 at the Honeyhill Pupil Referral Unit in Peterborough are allowed two supervised off-site smoking breaks each day, with parental consent.
Claire George said allowing smoking stopped some pupils from “absconding”.
Peterborough MP Stewart Jackson said he had asked the city council, which runs the unit, to review the policy.
Ms George said: “Pupils who attend Honeyhill do so because they have failed, many more than once, in mainstream education.
“They are amongst the most challenged and challenging young people within the city and most have complex issues.”
The school’s approach to keeping them in the education system therefore had to be “different”, she said.
“Our approach is that pupils who already smoke on admission can, with parental consent, have up to two 10-minute, off-site, fully supervised smoking breaks a day.
“We appreciate that some people will not agree with this approach, but we have found it far more effective than simply banning smoking, which our experience shows us leads to pupils not attending school or absconding during the day to smoke unsupervised, often in dangerous situations.
“All pupils are required to hand in smoking-related materials at the beginning of each day,” she said.
‘End the practice’
The pupils were also offered support to stop smoking, Ms George added.
A spokesperson for anti-smoking group Action on Smoking and Health (Ash) said: “If the unit does not allow alcohol or drugs, why would they allow smoking?
“It is totally out of kilter with current health advice and they should think seriously about reversing the policy.”
The Conservative Mr Jackson said: “I’ve asked the city council to review this with the school and try to find a way to end the practice.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-26480334

Hey, at least they feel good for getting one over on the rules and regulations that everyone else had to follow.

(I’m sure we’ve done this before, but a quick search found nothing and this does have today’s date on it)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,597

Send private message

By: snafu - 8th March 2014 at 21:44

Don’t agree one bit SNAFU, when you retire, I bet you a pound to a pinch of the proverbial, you wouldn’t be able to live on the State Pension alone.
Thinking of number one?. no, just common sense in making sure that when I retired, I would have enough to live the life I do, without having to rely on handouts.
Have you noticed just how many “Food Banks” there are in this Country of late?.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Agree or don’t agree – up to you, but SOME people get nothing more than state pension, some couldn’t afford to take on an additional pension, some have been shafted by their employers, some didn’t/couldn’t work or have been married & divorced without building up the necessary number of stamps. For those people there is no choice but to rely on what the government hands out – no choice – but that doesn’t seem to be of much interest around here (hence number one).
As for food banks, who do you think needs food banks? People who can’t afford food, maybe? Like, as an example. down on their luck single pension pensioners…? And what did they do when they worked – shop assistants, farm workers, road maintenance, building and decorating, in fact anything that couldn’t let them put anything away for a rainy post work afterlife. Who cares for them? Not you lot, it seems…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th March 2014 at 18:46

Indeed so Linc, but it’s handy when taxpayers top up the superannuated scheme!! As a freelance for much of my working life I never indulged and probably regret it now although I’ve never been one for regrets. It is what it is!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 8th March 2014 at 18:14

Chas, I am sure if SNAFU would like 11.5% of his wages paid into a pension fund ie, Superannuation for 30yrs as I did.or such like, then he would also benefit. Out of my 3 children, it’s only my son who has a Private pension scheme in hand.
It’s not a Club for the exclusive Chas, anyone can join.And YES, I still pay Income Tax on my pension.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th March 2014 at 16:46

But you get both, Linc. Yes for those who either had to contribute or opted to contribute topped up by the employer you will enjoy a more comfortable retirement. But those in public service had their pension pots topped up by – guess who? – the taxpayer! And the taxpayer continues to contribute to many public employees’ pensions.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 8th March 2014 at 15:55

Don’t agree one bit SNAFU, when you retire, I bet you a pound to a pinch of the proverbial, you wouldn’t be able to live on the State Pension alone.
Thinking of number one?. no, just common sense in making sure that when I retired, I would have enough to live the life I do, without having to rely on handouts.
Have you noticed just how many “Food Banks” there are in this Country of late?.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,597

Send private message

By: snafu - 8th March 2014 at 15:50

But that won’t help everyone, which was my thinking.

Always thinking of number one, and only number one, you lot…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 8th March 2014 at 15:43

Smoking good news: the more who smoke proportionally the more who die who I don’t have to share my pension with.
Smoking bad news: the more who smoke proportionally the more that die who won’t help contribute to my pension

You could always take out your own private pension SNAFU, rather than relying on others to contribute to the State Pension.I did.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 8th March 2014 at 15:36

And if children grow up with no comprehension of discipline and rights and responsibilities what sort of parents will they be??

Exactly Chas.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th March 2014 at 15:32

Smoking news – good/bad? Tobacco taxes contribute £12.5 billion to the treasury annually. No tobacco tax = revenue shortfall!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,597

Send private message

By: snafu - 8th March 2014 at 15:24

Smoking good news: the more who smoke proportionally the more who die who I don’t have to share my pension with.
Smoking bad news: the more who smoke proportionally the more that die who won’t help contribute to my pension.

Bu33er.

And still they throw their dog ends out of car windows and on the floor; why is it that you are instantly an antisocial litterer caring little about the world the rest of us also live in?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,892

Send private message

By: trumper - 8th March 2014 at 13:46

Worse than average BUT it will be a descending spiral to lower the level of average overall.

I wonder what the smoking levels will be in 10 years.The amount of people that have given up in the last 5 years or so is huge but i suppose you will have the new smokers who will try it and the hard core smokers who just wont give up.
I also wonder how much a packet of fags will end up as,maybe room for a less addictive alternative that is legal in most places.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,597

Send private message

By: snafu - 8th March 2014 at 12:25

Average ones?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th March 2014 at 12:04

And if children grow up with no comprehension of discipline and rights and responsibilities what sort of parents will they be??

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

15,105

Send private message

By: Lincoln 7 - 8th March 2014 at 09:12

And that’s the trouble Chas, the schools can’t administer punishment, and the kids, have a “Help line” they can phone, if their parents give them a bat round the ear, whether it’s justified or not.
Far, far too much P.C. going on, in just about everything one can think of.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 8th March 2014 at 05:34

“….nowadays teachers can’t say boo to their pupils…”. Yes that is the root of this and every other problem involving discipline at school.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

518

Send private message

By: wl745 - 8th March 2014 at 00:27

One teacher I knew (at school 1950s) made them smoke the whole packet one after the other .Not many reoffenders!!Of course nowadays teachers cant say Boo to their pupils.Well I got the cane many times and for smoking but it didn’t do me any harm.Old fashioned thinking?Maybe but it worked .

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,597

Send private message

By: snafu - 7th March 2014 at 23:22

education never really worked when I was at school, and it doesn’t appear to work these days either if the number of kids smoking outside the school gates these days is anything to go by.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,892

Send private message

By: trumper - 7th March 2014 at 18:45

I guess they have to try something,something controlled with education is better than nothing.The kids who want to smoke are going to anyway,hopefully the health lessons will convince them and others how stupid they are being.

Sign in to post a reply